Bug#621370: Kernel panic linux-image-2.6.37-2-amd64

2011-04-06 Thread Андрей Василишин
Package: linux-image-2.6.37-2-amd64 Version: 2.6.37-2 [178205.956211] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 8800f4d3e138 [178205.956511] IP: [812a6fde] tcp_transmit_skb+0x2ed/0x74b [178205.956698] PGD 1604063 PUD 1fffc067 PMD 0 [178205.956862] Oops: 0002 [#1] SMP

Bug#613248: aufs: aufs Direct I/O support

2011-02-13 Thread Андрей Василишин
Package: linux-2.6 Version: 2.6.32-26 Severity: wishlist File: aufs Hi! Latest aufs have Direct I/O support which I need. Can you update aufs module for latest? # modinfo aufs filename: /lib/modules/2.6.32-5-amd64/kernel/fs/aufs/aufs.ko staging:Y version:

Bug#573189: linux-image-2.6.33-2-686: aufs does not work in, 2.6.33

2011-02-15 Thread Андрей Василишин
Why can't you understand that: - squeeze is going to use 2.6.32 - experimental is experimental - aufs is a dirty hack and will keep on breaking Why is aufs a dirty hack? I am using it for merging many HDDs in a big storage. I tested mhddfs (http://svn.uvw.ru/mhddfs/trunk/README) and it very

Bug#573189: linux-image-2.6.33-2-686: aufs does not work in, 2.6.33

2011-02-15 Thread Андрей Василишин
15.02.2011 17:15, Ben Hutchings пишет: On Tue, 2011-02-15 at 17:09 +0200, Андрей Василишин wrote: Why can't you understand that: - squeeze is going to use 2.6.32 - experimental is experimental - aufs is a dirty hack and will keep on breaking Why is aufs a dirty hack? Because

Bug#632373: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000010

2011-07-01 Thread Андрей Василишин
Package: linux-image-2.6-amd64 Version: 2.6.39-2 [19633.004002] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0010 [19633.004002] IP: [811a6550] rb_erase+0x139/0x270 [19633.004002] PGD 0 [19633.004002] Oops: [#1] SMP [19633.004002] last sysfs file:

Bug#632373: closed by Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk (Re: Bug#632373: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000010)

2011-07-02 Thread Андрей Василишин
I didn't load tpm module, it automatiacaly loaded by OS. I am waiting for union mounts to get rid of aufs. -- WBR, Andrey Vasilishin CDIG1-UANIC, CDIG1-RIPE -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact

Bug#690320: netxen_nic using only 1 interrupt

2012-10-12 Thread Андрей Василишин
Package: firmware-netxen Version: 0.36 After upgrade firmware-netxen NIC using only 1 of 4 interrupts Network-adapter: Model: Hewlett-Packard Company NC522SFP Dual Port 10GbE Server Adapter # modinfo netxen_nic filename:

Bug#636955: mount doesn't show aufs partition

2011-08-07 Thread Андрей Василишин
Package: linux-image-686-pae Version: 2.6.39-2-686-pae # cat /etc/fstab # /etc/fstab: static file system information. # # Use 'blkid' to print the universally unique identifier for a # device; this may be used with UUID= as a more robust way to name devices # that works even if disks are

Bug#636955: mount doesn't show aufs partition

2011-08-07 Thread Андрей Василишин
07.08.2011 15:45, Ben Hutchings пишет: On Sun, 2011-08-07 at 15:18 +0300, Андрей Василишин wrote: [...] # ls /sys/fs/aufs/si_f7eb3586/ br0 br1 br2 br3 br4 br5 br6 br7 xi_path Aufs partion is mounted, but not shown by commads mount, df What command did you use to mount

Bug#636955: mount doesn't show aufs partition

2011-08-07 Thread Андрей Василишин
07.08.2011 16:21, Ben Hutchings пишет: On Sun, 2011-08-07 at 15:49 +0300, Андрей Василишин wrote: 07.08.2011 15:45, Ben Hutchings пишет: On Sun, 2011-08-07 at 15:18 +0300, Андрей Василишин wrote: [...] # ls /sys/fs/aufs/si_f7eb3586/ br0 br1 br2 br3 br4 br5 br6 br7 xi_path Aufs

Bug#642025: (r8169): transmit queue 0 timed out

2012-06-20 Thread Андрей Василишин
19.06.2012 22:10, Jonathan Nieder пишет: Hi Andrei, Андрей Василишин wrote: NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0 (r8169): transmit queue 0 timed out Sorry for the long silence. Did this happen only once, or was it reproducible? If the latter, is it still reproducible? What kernel

Bug#681710: kernel panic linux-image-3.2.0-3-amd64 3.2.21-3

2012-07-15 Thread Андрей Василишин
Package: linux-image-3.2.0-3-amd64 Version: 3.2.21-3 Jul 15 15:53:27 host-37 kernel: [ 85.049563] [ cut here ] Jul 15 15:53:27 host-37 kernel: [ 85.049572] WARNING: at /build/buildd-linux_3.2.21-3-amd64-l_qIBB/linux-3.2.21/kernel/time/timekeeping.c:863

Bug#644938: [PATCH] mv_sas: OCZ RevoDrive3/zDrive R4 support

2011-10-10 Thread Андрей Василишин
Package: linux-2.6 Version: 3.0.0-5 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch, experimental Please add patch for latest kernel. More info: http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-scsi/msg54889.html

Bug#642003: (ATL1E): transmit queue 0 timed out

2013-03-30 Thread Андрей Василишин
31.03.2013 2:22, Ben Hutchings пишет: Are you still seeing this problem with the atl1e driver? Does booting with the kernel parameter 'pci=nomsi' avoid the problem? Ben. Hello! Sorry, Ben, after a few downs I do not use Atheros NICs. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Bug#742609: warn_alloc_failed+0x11f/0x134 linux-image-3.2.0-4-amd64 3.2.54-2

2014-03-26 Thread Андрей Василишин
25.03.2014 19:20, Ben Hutchings пишет: Control: tag -1 moreinfo It's very hard to read this log due to word-wrapping. It looks like you've enabled jumbo frames with a network driver that doesn't support scatter/gather. This is bound to fail under memory pressure. (mlx4_en was changed to

Bug#754233: kernel panic linux-image-3.2.0-4-amd64 3.2.60-1+deb7u1

2014-07-08 Thread Андрей Василишин
Package: linux-image-3.2.0-4-amd64 Version: 3.2.60-1+deb7u1 Hello! A few latest wheezy kernels falling after 2-3 minutes uptime. Message from syslogd@localhost at Jul 9 00:11:02 ... kernel:[ 252.195448] general protection fault: [#1] SMP Message from syslogd@localhost at Jul 9

Bug#840184: df and du shows different size

2016-10-09 Thread Андрей Василишин
09.10.2016 17:04, Ben Hutchings пишет: Control: tag -1 moreinfo On Sun, 2016-10-09 at 14:26 +0300, Андрей Василишин wrote: Package: linux-image-3.16.0-4-amd64 Version: 3.16.36-1+deb8u1 Hello! Usually df -h and du -hs shows the same used space. That's not generally true, due to metadata

Bug#840184: df and du shows different size

2016-10-09 Thread Андрей Василишин
Package: linux-image-3.16.0-4-amd64 Version: 3.16.36-1+deb8u1 Hello! Usually df -h and du -hs shows the same used space. But now I have a problem. I am using two SSD for a cache. Script using df command, all time writes and deletes files. There are no such problem with wheezy kernels. df

Bug#840184: df and du shows different size

2016-10-09 Thread Андрей Василишин
09.10.2016 17:52, Ben Hutchings пишет: Have you run fsck over these filesystems recently? Yes, last was a few days ago. If I run fsck over these filesystems, du and df show the same used space.

Bug#896881: CPU: 8 PID: 1 Comm: init Not tainted 4.9.0-0.bpo.6-amd64

2018-04-25 Thread Андрей Василишин
Package: linux-image-4.9.0-0.bpo.6-amd64 Version: 4.9.82-1+deb9u3~bpo8+1 Hello! After update linux-image from linux-image-3.2.0-4-amd64 3.2.96-2 to linux-image-4.9.0-0.bpo.6-amd64 4.9.82-1+deb9u3~bpo8+1 new kernel does not want boot. After installation linux-image-4.9.0-6-amd64

Bug#896881: CPU: 8 PID: 1 Comm: init Not tainted 4.9.0-0.bpo.6-amd64

2018-04-25 Thread Андрей Василишин
Which Debian release are you using? Debian 7 "wheezy" or 8 "jessie"? Ben. cat /etc/debian_version 7.11