Hi,
We're somewhat overdue with the next Squeeze point release (6.0.7) and
it'd be good to get it done before the wheezy release, so that we can
pull in some upgrade fixes. As an opening gambit, some proposed dates,
all of which appear to currently work for me:
February 23rd
March 2nd
March
On Sat, 2013-01-19 at 18:14 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Sun, 2013-01-13 at 14:19 +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
am Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 12:16:30AM + hast du folgendes geschrieben:
We have a huge number of important fixes from 2.6.32.60 pending in svn,
plus two SCSI driver updates (hpsa
On Sat, 2012-11-03 at 14:20 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Fri, 2012-11-02 at 21:59 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Fri, 2012-10-19 at 14:44 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
I intend to upload linux version 3.2.32-1 to unstable this weekend.
This brings in various fixes from stable updates
On Fri, 2012-10-19 at 14:44 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
I intend to upload linux version 3.2.32-1 to unstable this weekend.
This brings in various fixes from stable updates 3.2.{31,32} and
elsewhere, and should fix the previous FTBFS on mips{,el}.
Unblocked after an ack from KiBi on IRC;
On Mon, 2012-09-24 at 09:01 +0900, dann frazier wrote:
On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 05:39:21PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Thanks for the upload; the builds seem to be going well. There don't
seem to be any new d-i changes in git, so I assume we just need lkdi,
a round of d-i binNMUs
On Tue, 2012-09-18 at 11:30 -0600, dann frazier wrote:
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 03:58:13PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
ok, given the replies, let's settle on this:
On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 09:43:03PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
* Sep 29/30: ok from RT side
[...]
Sorry, been travelling
On Fri, 2012-09-07 at 21:43 +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
I'd like to arrange a point release to be done as soon as feasible.
So I'd like to propose a bunch of weekends here:
* Sep 22/23: I'm personally busy on the 23th
* Sep 29/30: ok from RT side
This is looking like the favourite so far,
On Wed, 2012-06-27 at 17:59 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 05:07:50PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On 26.06.2012 16:35, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org (25/06/2012):
- udeb freeze.
debian-release, please put that back into place. Thanks
On 26.06.2012 16:35, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org (25/06/2012):
- udeb freeze.
debian-release, please put that back into place. Thanks already!
Done.
As discussed, I've enabled all of the blocks, including those in the
can be handled by britney category. If
On Mon, 2012-05-28 at 22:20 +1000, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 01:05:58PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On 23.05.2012 19:31, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Wed, 2012-05-16 at 13:19 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
With the sound of the ever approaching freeze ringing loudly
On 15.01.2012 20:16, Ãmeric Maschino wrote:
Le 15 janvier 2012 19:08, maximilian attems m...@stro.at a écrit :
Nice detective work. Â So the next question is: why does klibc-utils
on
ia64 provide /usr/lib/klibc/bin/sh instead of sh.shared like other
architectures?
#439181 Â ia64 works only
On Mon, 2012-04-30 at 10:09 -0600, dann frazier wrote:
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 04:15:31AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Sun, 2012-04-29 at 16:36 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Is the new version ready for upload? It's looking like the point
release will be the 12/13th, so it would
Hi,
The next point release for squeeze (6.0.5) is scheduled for Saturday
May 12th. Stable NEW will be frozen during the preceding weekend
(5/6th).
As usual, base-files can be uploaded at any point before the freeze.
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Thu, 2012-04-26 at 05:00 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
I think we're going to need to do another kernel upload before the point
release to revert a fix that is worse than the original bug:
Subject: Revert autofs: work around unhappy compat problem on x86-64
This reverts commit
On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 21:06 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
6.0.5 is somewhat overdue now and I've been procrastinating over
organising it for a while. So before I find something else to distract
myself with, some suggested dates:
It looks like the discussion has converged towards:
May 12/13
Hi,
6.0.5 is somewhat overdue now and I've been procrastinating over
organising it for a while. So before I find something else to distract
myself with, some suggested dates:
May 5/6: Probably doable; would mean we need to close p-u-NEW over the
coming weekend.
May 12/13: York BSP. Probably
On 29.02.2012 17:20, dann frazier wrote:
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 01:20:32PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Feel free to go ahead with the kernel upload, so we can get it
chucked at the buildds.
[...]
Ack.
Unfortunately, the powerpc build died:
CC [M] arch/powerpc/oprofile/op_model_power4.o
On 02.03.2012 10:47, Holger Levsen wrote:
On Freitag, 2. März 2012, Kees Cook wrote:
+ * The new kernel version includes security restrictions on
links,
+These restrictions may cause some legitimate programs to
fail.
+In particular, if the 'at' package is installed, you should
On 27.02.2012 01:12, dann frazier wrote:
Ok - sounds like no DSA, but maybe an upload via o-p-u. My vote is to
do no kernel upload if the release gets scheduled for the first
weekend in march - that's one week out, and I'll have spotty
availability beginning mid-week. For later weekends, I'm for
Hi,
The next - and final - point release for lenny (5.0.10) is scheduled
for Saturday March 10th. Oldstable NEW will be frozen during the coming
weekend (3rd/4th).
As this will be the last point release for lenny, it will be moved to
archive.debian.org in the near future (most likely on or
[Cc list trimmed]
On Thu, 2012-02-23 at 15:03 -0700, dann frazier wrote:
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 04:55:32PM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 09:36:38PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
-kernel, -boot - were there any plans for a final kernel and/or d-i
upload for lenny
On Mon, 2011-12-12 at 23:05 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Working on the four-monthly schedule for oldstable, the next lenny point
release would be due in early February.
As the security team have recently confirmed that security support for
lenny will end on February 6th (a year after
[CC += -boot]
On 16.01.2012 19:06, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Sat, 2012-01-14 at 04:09 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Wed, 2012-01-11 at 13:12 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
If there is a further kernel update planned for inclusion in the
point
release, it would be ideal if that could
[trimmed CC list]
On Sat, 2012-01-14 at 04:09 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Wed, 2012-01-11 at 13:12 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
If there is a further kernel update planned for inclusion in the point
release, it would be ideal if that could be uploaded over the coming
weekend so
Hi,
The next point release for squeeze (6.0.4) is scheduled for Saturday
January 28th. Stable NEW will be frozen during the preceeding weekend
(21st/22nd).
As usual, base-files can be uploaded at any point before the freeze.
If there is a further kernel update planned for inclusion in the
On Thu, 2011-12-15 at 09:56 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
On Wed, 2011-12-14 at 19:25 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Please go ahead; thanks.
Uploaded.
For the record, this was accepted earlier today.
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
On Wed, 2011-10-26 at 09:05 +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
[...]
Adam == Adam D Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk writes:
Adam The krb5 package was uploaded and I've (somewhat belatedly)
Adam marked it for acceptance at the next dinstall. What's the
Adam status of the nfs-utils
On Tue, 13 Sep 2011 20:27:55 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Sun, 2011-09-11 at 23:59 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
I believe we're now ready to do the kernel update, having got most
of
the security fixes done separately. I'm going to start a build now
and
intend to upload tomorrow unless I
On Sun, 2011-09-11 at 23:59 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Wed, 2011-09-07 at 21:30 +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
For Squeeze it would be cool to have the kernel in for testing end of
next week (16/17th). The d-i upload should be there the middle of week
39, October 1st at the latest.
[...]
On Mon, 2011-09-05 at 12:46 -0400, Sam Hartman wrote:
Adam == Adam D Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk writes:
Adam The krb5 package was uploaded and I've (somewhat belatedly)
Adam marked it for acceptance at the next dinstall. What's the
Adam status of the nfs-utils upload
On Fri, 2011-08-05 at 19:09 +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 01:34:34AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
I've attached the patches for both packages to this mail. Phil, is it ok
for these to be uploaded to stable-proposed-updates? This fixes a bug that
makes squeeze
On Mon, 2011-08-15 at 03:05 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
Finally, there is a pending security update for squeeze
(2.6.32-35squeeze1). I would like to see this released first so that
the s-p-u upload (2.6.32-36) can include its fixes.
Is there an (E)ETA for the security release?
Regards,
Adam
On Sat, 2011-05-21 at 16:55 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
I understand that the plan is to release the next stable update in 'late
May', i.e. the next 10 days.
As you'll have noticed, that didn't happen. We are now looking at
releasing 6.0.2 on June 25th, i.e. in a little over two weeks from
On Wed, 2011-06-08 at 20:05 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 07:55:31PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Sat, 2011-05-21 at 16:55 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
I'm working on network driver updates to support new hardware, and I
[...]
How are things going? In order
On Wed, 2011-06-08 at 20:05 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 07:55:31PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
How are things going? In order to ensure that we have time to get the
kernel available on all architectures and then perform a respin of the
installer to pull
On Sat, 2011-05-21 at 16:55 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
I understand that the plan is to release the next stable update in 'late
May', i.e. the next 10 days.
That's what _should_ happen according to the rough schedule, yes. Sadly
(or not so, depending on how you look at it), I haven't found
On Mon, 2011-04-25 at 17:37 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Mon, 2011-04-25 at 17:35 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Wed, 2011-04-13 at 12:57 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
I think there's still a Xen regression (since 2.6.32-31) to be fixed.
I'm assuming that's #621072, which it looks
On Wed, 2011-04-13 at 12:57 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Wed, 2011-04-13 at 06:31 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
[...]
On Sun, 2011-03-27 at 20:31 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
There were a couple of regressions in linux-2.6 version 2.6.32-31 (i.e.
Debian 6.0.1) that should be fixed
On Wed, April 13, 2011 12:57, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Wed, 2011-04-13 at 06:31 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
The kernel's now built everywhere; thanks for following up on that. As
this is the first time that we've actively pushed a non-security stable
kernel update outside of the point
On Tue, 2011-03-29 at 23:26 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Sun, 2011-03-27 at 20:31 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
There were a couple of regressions in linux-2.6 version 2.6.32-31 (i.e.
Debian 6.0.1) that should be fixed a.s.a.p:
[...]
Either Dann or I will upload an update to stable
On Tue, 2011-04-05 at 23:35 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
Version 2.6.38-2 had build failures on a couple of architectures. We
now have fixes for those, and a few other bugs. There is no pending
stable update for 2.6.38, so I intend to upload this in about 24 hours'
time if there are no
severity 620124 wishlist
thanks
Hi,
On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 20:25 +0900, Hiroyuki Yamamoto wrote:
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.38-2
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Please package linux-tools-2.6.38 on ppc64.
ppc64 isn't an official Debian architecture, so this isn't at all RC.
The
On Sun, 2011-03-27 at 20:31 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
There were a couple of regressions in linux-2.6 version 2.6.32-31 (i.e.
Debian 6.0.1) that should be fixed a.s.a.p:
[...]
Either Dann or I will upload an update to stable-proposed-updates,
intended for early release through
On Tue, 2011-03-01 at 18:19 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 11:23:42AM +, Otavio Salvador wrote:
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 04:53, Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk wrote:
...
I know that I need to upload in time for the installer team to rebuild
the installer with
user release.debian@packages.debian.org
clone 602853 -1
severity -1 wishlist
reassign -1 release-notes
retitle -1 Document sparc console handover issues
usertag 602853 + squeeze-can-defer
tag 602853 + squeeze-ignore
thanks
On Mon, 2011-01-31 at 19:21 +0100, Fabio M. Di Nitto wrote:
severity
tag 601747 + moreinfo
thanks
On Fri, 2010-10-29 at 18:07 +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote:
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.32-26
You know, RDS protocol vulnerability was found in Linux kernel.
US-Cert says (http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/362983)
The RDS protocol implementation of Linux
On Wed, 2010-07-21 at 01:09 +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
tags 589716 + pending
Bug #589716 [tgt] tgtd target will not start unless it's configured with
On Mon, 2010-06-21 at 23:25 +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
killall -1 auditd gives the following:
type=DAEMON_CONFIG msg=audit(1277126468.809:6233) config changed, auid=0
pid=9667 subj=unconfined_u:unconfined_r:unconfined_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023
res=success
killall -1 auditd rotated the logs and
On Sun, 2010-04-18 at 13:06 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
I'm intending to upload nfs-utils to stable-proposed-updates with the
following changes, to support partial upgrades (specifically kernel
upgrades). Please ack/nak.
Ben.
diff -u nfs-utils-1.1.2/debian/changelog
reassign 527493 libmtp8
forcemerge 525094 527493
thanks
Hi,
On Thu, 2009-05-07 at 15:50 -0500, Ken Bloom wrote:
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.93.2
Severity: serious
Justification: breaks kernel upgrades
update-initramfs tries to access libmtp.rules, but fails because it
doesn't
# See comments in body
tags 391709 = confirmed
merge 391709 379332
close 391710
close 391711
thanks
Hi,
On Sun, 2006-10-08 at 02:34 -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[...]
clone 389269 -5
Bug#389269: kernel-patch-2.2.25-m68k: Shouldn't ship
Hi (again),
On Sun, 2006-10-08 at 02:34 -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
[...]
clone 387331 -2
Bug#387331: Uninstallable due to unmet dep on kernel-image-2.4.27-3-686-smp
Bug 387331 cloned as bug 391706.
[...]
retitle -2 RM: kernel-image-2.4-686-smp -- RoM etch 2.6 only
I realise
On Sun, 2006-06-25 at 10:22 +0200, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
It has been marked as closed by one of the developers, namely
Filipus Klutiero [EMAIL PROTECTED].
Are you sure?
Yes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo apt-get install linux-image-2.6-686
Reading package
101 - 153 of 153 matches
Mail list logo
