Bug#729573: linux-image-3.2.0-4-amd64: [ath9k_htc] MAC address not properly updated

2013-11-14 Thread Bastian Blank
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 02:41:32PM +0100, Mathy Vanhoef wrote: > Can a CVE ID be assigned to this? You have to refer to oss-secur...@lists.openwall.com. Debian can only assign CVE for non-public issues. Bastian -- The heart is not a logical organ. -- Dr. Janet Wallace, "The Dea

Re: [PATCH] Allow use of foreign linux-headers packages with a native compiler

2013-11-11 Thread Bastian Blank
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 02:56:33AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote: > I also want gencontrol.py to check that linux-compiler template > specifies the same compiler as the config. That's why I don't want to make it related to the kernel version but to the compiler version. Bastian -- First study the

Bug#648155: Will this patch be applied?

2013-11-05 Thread Bastian Blank
On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 05:36:12PM +0100, Per Olofsson wrote: > Seems that maybe they reverted to the old behavior after all: > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=eb96d5c97b0825d542e9c4ba5e0a22b519355166 Okay. Ben: can we fix that via longterm? The patch is

Bug#728759: linux - compat_sys_getrlimit returns values compat_sys_setrlimit does not like

2013-11-05 Thread Bastian Blank
Control: tags -1 patch On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 09:29:42AM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote: > compat_sys_getrlimit clips all values above COMPAT_RLIM_INFINITY. So > any large values between COMPAT_RLIM_INFINITY and RLIM_INFINITY is > returned as the same value COMPAT_RLIM_INFINITY. Untes

Bug#728759: linux - compat_sys_getrlimit returns values compat_sys_setrlimit does not like

2013-11-05 Thread Bastian Blank
Package: src:linux Version: 3.2.51-1 Severity: normal compat_sys_getrlimit clips all values above COMPAT_RLIM_INFINITY. So any large values between COMPAT_RLIM_INFINITY and RLIM_INFINITY is returned as the same value COMPAT_RLIM_INFINITY. compat_sys_setrlimit converts COMPAT_RLIM_INFINITY to RLI

Bug#648155: Will this patch be applied?

2013-11-04 Thread Bastian Blank
On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 04:28:40PM +0100, Per Olofsson wrote: > 6. sshd hangs because the kernel is waiting for the expired ticket to >be renewed. Hmm. I can't reproduce this. | $ klist | Credentials cache: FILE:/tmp/krb5cc_1000 | Principal: wa...@example.org | | Issued

Bug#728668: linux-image-3.11-1-powerpc: nouveau kernel message every 10 seconds: E[ DRM] DDC responded, but no EDID for TV-1

2013-11-04 Thread Bastian Blank
On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 09:11:30AM -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > On 11/04/2013 05:01 AM, Bastian Blank wrote: > >Do you have something connected to the TV-1 output? > As far as i know, there is no TV-1 output. It's this style of machine: > https://upload.wikimedia.o

Bug#728668: linux-image-3.11-1-powerpc: nouveau kernel message every 10 seconds: E[ DRM] DDC responded, but no EDID for TV-1

2013-11-04 Thread Bastian Blank
On Sun, Nov 03, 2013 at 11:37:11PM +, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > As you can see from the attached kernel log, the nouveau module is > reporting the same error message every 10 seconds. > [ 319.038615] nouveau E[ DRM] DDC responded, but no EDID for TV-1 > [ 329.086576] nouveau E[ DR

Bug#727736: With full log: Wheezy -> testing kernel upgrade won't reboot.

2013-10-27 Thread Bastian Blank
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 03:33:18AM +0200, Regid Ichira wrote: > I think the PV-GRUB able aki is irrelevant for our discussion: The original error was from PV-GRUB. I'm not going to respond to the rest of the mail as you did not do as I said. Please only replace the aki with one listed on the p

Re: [PATCH] Allow use of foreign linux-headers packages with a native compiler

2013-10-27 Thread Bastian Blank
On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 01:27:01PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote: > I would do it this way: > - Add linux-compiler-@version@-x86/linux-compiler-@version@-s390 to > linux-tools:template/config.extra.in (not sure if support is currently > in there or if it needs to be copied from linux

Re: [PATCH] Allow use of foreign linux-headers packages with a native compiler

2013-10-27 Thread Bastian Blank
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 10:11:24PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > The meta-packages do not exist and cross-architecture dependencies are > not supported by dak or britney. So for now, introduce our own > meta-packages where we need them. Okay as a workaround, but your solution is a bit overenginee

Bug#727736: With full log: Wheezy -> testing kernel upgrade won't reboot.

2013-10-27 Thread Bastian Blank
On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 05:52:46AM +0200, Regid Ichira wrote: >Kernel ID aki-b6aa75df This does not match _any_ of the PV-GRUB versions listed on [1]. Bastian [1]: http://docs.aws.amazon.com/AWSEC2/latest/UserGuide/UserProvidedKernels.html -- No problem is insoluble.

Bug#727736: Latest linux-image-686-pae fail to boot a xen domU

2013-10-25 Thread Bastian Blank
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 05:18:56AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > I think this is just like missing hardware support, which we consider an > important bug. And it's also a regression in support. There is no hardware involved. > I don't know whether it is important enough to justify using less > e

Bug#727736: Latest linux-image-686-pae fail to boot a xen domU

2013-10-25 Thread Bastian Blank
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 01:12:56AM +0300, Regid Ichira wrote: > This version depends on linux-image-3.10-3-686-pae. I am the > client of a xen provider. Unfortuntely, because of that I don't have > many details. I think there is a similar problem with both Amazon > Web Service, and another pro

Re: 717215: wrong udp checksum with virtio: workaround and patch

2013-09-18 Thread Bastian Blank
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 12:35:15PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote: > so this bug is caused by the virtio driver not populating the UDP checksum > and > thus dhcpd complains about this, see > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/isc-dhcp/+bug/930962 > for more background and a patch for dhcpd.

Bug#721191: linux: patch for parisc/hppa architecture

2013-09-08 Thread Bastian Blank
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 11:53:58PM +0200, Helge Deller wrote: > On 08/28/2013 11:35 PM, Bastian Blank wrote: > > Looks reasonable. But please send further changes to remove the > > non-smp kernels. > I can do that. Do you have some background on this request for me? > Is it

Re: gcc 4.8

2013-09-05 Thread Bastian Blank
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 07:55:23PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 07:27:24PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > > I did a first build of Linux 3.9 with gcc 4.8. It works fine on s390x, > > however I found a weird not longer reproducible bug in s390. I think > &

Bug#690737: at least on 3.10

2013-08-30 Thread Bastian Blank
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 04:46:41PM -0300, Carlos R. Pasqualini wrote: > El jue, 29-08-2013 a las 10:31 +0200, Bastian Blank escribió: > > Also for you the question: What does it bring for our users? > The possibility to have a more efficient way of having an AV looking on > the f

Bug#690737: at least on 3.10

2013-08-29 Thread Bastian Blank
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 09:05:01PM -0300, Carlos R. Pasqualini wrote: > can we have this option by default at least on Testing? Also for you the question: What does it bring for our users? > today, i have installed 3.10 backport kernel for testing Skyld AV and > found that i need to recompile the

Bug#721191: linux: patch for parisc/hppa architecture

2013-08-28 Thread Bastian Blank
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 11:22:09PM +0200, Helge Deller wrote: > could you please apply the attached trivial patch, which enables support for > C8000 PARISC workstation with your latest 3.10 (and higher) unstable kernel. Okay. > It would be nice, if you could apply this patch to your linux source

Bug#721115: linux-base: Depends on libuuid-perl then perlapi-5.14.2, however perlapi-5.14.2 was removed in perl (5.18.1-2)

2013-08-28 Thread Bastian Blank
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 03:33:46PM -0400, Nigel Horne wrote: > >On 2013-08-28 11:49 +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote: > >Indeed, so this bug is nonsense. > That's strong and unfriendly. The bug is not nonsense, it exists and hit me. > The solution may well not be correct, > however it's not "nonsense"

Bug#720272: unbootable and lead to data loss?

2013-08-21 Thread Bastian Blank
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 11:11:21AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > There might be if the CPUs that don't advertise PAE also weren't tested > for PAE functionality at manufacturing time. Does the spec for this cpu family mandate the check in CPUID? Well I checked and it tells: | Software can discove

Bug#720272: unbootable and lead to data loss?

2013-08-21 Thread Bastian Blank
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 09:00:14AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Tue, 2013-08-20 at 22:51 +0800, jida...@jidanni.org wrote: > > product: Intel(R) Celeron(R) M processor 1.40GHz > > capabilities: fpu fpu_exception wp vme de pse tsc msr mce cx8 sep > > mtrr pge mca cmov

Bug#720272: unbootable and lead to data loss?

2013-08-19 Thread Bastian Blank
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 07:53:06AM +0800, jida...@jidanni.org wrote: > Thus wouldn't installing it and removing other kernels make the system > unbootable or lead to data loss? No. First: no kernel is removed automatically. Second: The data loss definition only applies to automatic stuff, not to s

Bug#720272: warn upon installing on non pae systems

2013-08-19 Thread Bastian Blank
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 07:42:38AM +0800, jida...@jidanni.org wrote: > Shouldn't some warning be given upon attempting to install on machines > where /proc/cpuinfo lacks pae? Why? There is no check if this is actually a machine capable of running a kernel with 686-style opcodes. Also the cpuid en

Re: Plan of action for Secure Boot support

2013-08-14 Thread Bastian Blank
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 12:30:55AM +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote: > Editing of binary packages is icky, so that's not part of the plan. > Instead, after dak signs an executable, the package maintainer downloads > and copies those into a separate 'source' package, which has a trivial > debian/rules. (

Bug#623377: rpcbind: Please include upstart support in the rpcbind package

2013-08-13 Thread Bastian Blank
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 01:15:31AM +0200, Steve Langasek wrote: > + * Fix to look directly in /run instead of via the /var/run symlink. Where is the bug report for this? > case "$1" in > start) > +if init_is_upstart; then > +exit 1 > +fi Where is this document

Bug#717689: linux: please review and merge m68k patch

2013-07-23 Thread Bastian Blank
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 08:42:04PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > +CONFIG_IOSCHED_DEADLINE=m > +CONFIG_IOSCHED_CFQ=m Should be configured in the top config. > +# CONFIG_EXT2_FS_SECURITY is not set > +# CONFIG_EXT3_FS_SECURITY is not set Why? > -CONFIG_EXT4_FS=y > -CONFIG_EXT4_USE_FOR_EXT23=y

Bug#717689: linux: please review and merge m68k patch

2013-07-23 Thread Bastian Blank
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 09:26:28PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > Which package is responsible for the inclusion of arch-specific > kernel modules into the initrd (for MODULES=most right now; I > have yet to try MODULES=dep)? initramfs-tools Bastian -- Violence in reality is quite different fr

Bug#711585: [linux-image-3.9-1-loongson-2f] linux 3.9.4-1 for loongson-2f doesn't halt/reboot/suspend-disk.

2013-07-21 Thread Bastian Blank
Control: tag -1 help On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 11:56:09PM -0600, Javier Vasquez wrote: > When rebooting, halting or suspending to disk on a mini-pc with > loongson-2f, it just hangs, printing a weird trace. Noone is currently really responsible for the mips kernel in Debian. So your best bet is to

Bug#578189: please move common headers to /usr/src/linux-headers-`uname -r`

2013-07-14 Thread Bastian Blank
On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 10:17:33AM +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote: > Any news about this? Nothing. What exactly do you want? Bastian -- Spock: The odds of surviving another attack are 13562190123 to 1, Captain. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of

Re: When did the naming convention for linux-source- change?

2013-07-10 Thread Bastian Blank
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 12:31:02PM +0300, Борислав Събев wrote: > Can anyone tell me when did the naming convention for the > "linux-source-N.N.N" packages change? Never. The naming convention is "linux-source-VERSION". The version is somehow related to the upstream version, which was something li

Bug#715478: Correctly match *,sec=krb5,*

2013-07-10 Thread Bastian Blank
On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 05:46:26PM +0200, Jan-Marek Glogowski wrote: > There are also bash regexp and IFS: bash-only, so well. > OLDIFS=$IFS Missing quotes. > IFS="," > for OPT in $OPTS; do > if [[ $OPT =~ ^sec=krb5[ip]?$ ]]; then > AUTO_NEED_

Bug#715548: linux-image-3.9-1-amd64: NFS causes a general protection fault

2013-07-10 Thread Bastian Blank
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 12:51:35PM +0200, Francois Gouget wrote: > I have a Solaris 11.11 (vmware) virtual machine which mounts a host > filesystem via NFS. > With the linux-image-3.2.0-3-amd64 kernel all was fine. > But with the linux-image-3.2.0-4-amd64 one the NFS accesses soon result in > the

Bug#715478: Correctly match *,sec=krb5,*

2013-07-09 Thread Bastian Blank
On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 03:57:08PM +0200, Jan-Marek Glogowski wrote: > +case "$OPTS" in > +sec=krb5|*,sec=krb5|sec=krb5,*|*,sec=krb5,*|\ > +sec=krb5i|*,sec=krb5i|sec=krb5i,*|*,sec=krb5i,*|\ > +sec=krb5p|*,sec=krb5p|sec=krb5p,*|*,sec=krb5p,*) I wonder if

Bug#715269: linux-image-3.2.0-4-amd64: High Load, High Rescheduling Interrupts in Wheezy

2013-07-07 Thread Bastian Blank
On Sun, Jul 07, 2013 at 08:11:53AM -0500, Will Platnick wrote: > My problem is that my Wheezy boxes have a load of over 3 and are not > staying up during our peak time, What do you mean with "are not staying up"? The load itself is no real indicator. > Rescheduling Interrupts: 4109580 on Wheezy v

gcc 4.8

2013-06-24 Thread Bastian Blank
Hi I did a first build of Linux 3.9 with gcc 4.8. It works fine on s390x, however I found a weird not longer reproducible bug in s390. I think about using it as default pretty fast for all architectures. Bastian -- Change is the essential process of all existence. -- Spock, "Let

Bug#690737: CONFIG_FANOTIFY_ACCESS_PERMISSIONS

2013-06-23 Thread Bastian Blank
On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 08:57:17PM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote: > Unfortunately Debian users have to build their own custom kernel > (with kpkg) if they want to use a virus scanner relying on the > fanotify interface as CONFIG_FANOTIFY_ACCESS_PERMISSIONS is set to > "N" even in the most recent

Bug#712590: ath9k: packet loss

2013-06-17 Thread Bastian Blank
Control: tag -1 moreinfo On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 10:19:51AM -0500, Ryan Nowakowski wrote: > ** Tainted: PO (4097) > * Proprietary module has been loaded. > * Out-of-tree module has been loaded. Please remove the out-of-tree modules. We don't support systems in this state. Bastian -- Those wh

Re: getting allwinner SoC support upstream (was Re: Uploading linux (3.9.4-1))

2013-06-05 Thread Bastian Blank
On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 08:46:30PM +0100, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > to begin to describe the problem in getting allwinner soc source code > upstream is this: not only do we have the usual "let's get it out the > door as fast as possible" learning curve of a very young, very new and > b

Bug#709989: linux-image-3.2.0-0.bpo.4-amd64: General protection fault after I/O on ext3 in KVM

2013-05-27 Thread Bastian Blank
Control: tag -1 moreinfo On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 12:32:07PM +0200, Vlastimil Holer wrote: > Filesystem is mounted with options: > noatime,nodiratime,nosuid,data=writeback,barrier=0,errors=remount-ro Why do you disable barriers? > ** Tainted: PDO (4225) > * Proprietary module has been loaded. >

Re: Using out of tree modules in d-i?

2013-05-25 Thread Bastian Blank
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 05:16:39PM +0200, Turbo Fredriksson wrote: > On May 22, 2013, at 3:52 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > Also, there are questions as to whether it would be legal. > Legal as in CDDL clashes with GPL you mean? Binaries of ZFS linked against the Linux kernel would be licensed unde

Re: Branches post-wheezy

2013-04-30 Thread Bastian Blank
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 02:03:42AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > There can be no more uploads to unstable for wheezy, so I propose to > rename sid -> wheezy for each package that currently has a sid branch. Okay. > Linux 3.9 is now out, so we have a choice between 3.8.10 and 3.9 as the > first up

Bug#705336: linux - kvm clock wrong after resume from disk

2013-04-17 Thread Bastian Blank
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 10:02:23PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Sat, 2013-04-13 at 11:24 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > > Within kvm the clock is wrong after a resume from disk. This should be > > fixed with b74f05d61b73af584d0c39121980171389ecfaaa. > Looks like a more-or-less

Bug#705345: linux-image-3.2.0-4-amd64: alx module crashes and requires reboot

2013-04-13 Thread Bastian Blank
Control: severity -1 important On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 01:55:32PM +0200, Kim Tore Jensen wrote: > Severity: critical > Justification: breaks the whole system No, it does not. > Stack trace from `dmesg` from when this happens: Please show _all_ messages. > [175657.940867] WARNING: at > /build/

Bug#705336: linux - kvm clock wrong after resume from disk

2013-04-13 Thread Bastian Blank
Package: src:linux Version: 3.2.41-2 Severity: important Within kvm the clock is wrong after a resume from disk. This should be fixed with b74f05d61b73af584d0c39121980171389ecfaaa. Bastian -- System Information: Debian Release: 7.0 APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'uns

Bug#685972: kernel BUG at /build/buildd-linux_3.2.41-2-amd64-Wvc92F/linux-3.2.41/drivers/pci/msi.c:316!

2013-04-12 Thread Bastian Blank
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 04:52:28PM -0700, Devon Stewart wrote: > [78700.527092] Pid: 32033, comm: ifconfig Tainted: G O > 3.2.0-4-amd64 #1 Debian 3.2.41-2 LENOVO 4298CTO/4298CTO You have out-of-tree modules loaded. Please remove them. Bastian -- Men of peace usually are [brave].

Bug#703637: linux-image-3.2.0-4-amd64: Kernel oops

2013-04-03 Thread Bastian Blank
On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 05:37:44PM -0700, Wagner Bruna wrote: > ** Tainted: O (4096) > * Out-of-tree module has been loaded. > [0.00] ACPI Warning: 32/64 FACS address mismatch in FADT - two FACS > tables! (20110623/tbfadt-365) > [0.00] ACPI Warning: 32/64X FACS address mismatch i

Bug#703859: initramfs-tools: initramfs not including the xenblk-front (net, and back) modules, so cannot boot any Debian Xen DomU

2013-03-25 Thread Bastian Blank
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 04:12:31PM +0100, Stefano Marinelli wrote: > Mmm...actually I was just looking at the initramfs.conf. I hadn't > noticed that the driver-policy was there and overriding it. Anyway, > I didn't touch it, so it's the default behaviour. The installer asks. And "most" is still t

Re: [RFC] Putting the date back into utsname::version

2013-03-22 Thread Bastian Blank
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 12:34:28AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote: > alt: #1 SMP PREEMPT RT 2023-02-21 Debian 9.99~rc99-9~experimental.9 [62] > alt: #1 SMP PREEMPT RT Debian 9.99~rc99-9~experimental.9 (2023-02-21) [64] This increases the distance between two versions to maybe 2 or 3 bytes. > Would

Bug#703260: closed by Bastian Blank (Re: Bug#703260: linux-image-3.2.0-4-amd64: KMS fails, radeon falls back to VESA)

2013-03-17 Thread Bastian Blank
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 12:14:27PM -0700, Larry McCarthy wrote: > I should try again when a newer one shows up, right? Or, (diletante!) how > do I refresh that package? You could try rebooting. If it still boots the old version (see "uname -v") you have to check your bootloader. Bastian -- It w

Bug#703040: No 1000baseT connection via crosslink with BCM95720 and tg3 module

2013-03-14 Thread Bastian Blank
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 03:51:36PM +0100, Frank Menzel wrote: > Package: firmware-linux-nonfree I don't think so. > Two Dell PowerEdge R620 connected via crosslink using the onboard Are you using a crossed ethernet cable? Don't do that. All GBit interfaces have to do that on its own. Bastian -

Bug#685726: ext4 bug for kernel linux-image-3.2.0-4-amd64 (3.2.39-2).

2013-03-14 Thread Bastian Blank
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 02:10:01PM +0400, hr...@infotech.am wrote: > This effect is exactly the same as it was before, but with one small > difference: the error messages suppressed, and we haven't chance to see > errors. > It is worst. We have the bug, but haven't error messages. The original bug

Bug#699205: linux-image-3.7-trunk-amd64: ps, pgrep and pkill segfault after upgrade from 3.7.1-1~experimental.2 to 3.7.3-1~experimental.1

2013-01-29 Thread Bastian Blank
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 12:18:02AM +0100, Sascha Silbe wrote: > after updating the linux-image-3.7-trunk-amd64 from > 3.7.1-1~experimental.2 to 3.7.3-1~experimental.1 today and rebooting, > the tools ps, pgrep and pkill (package procps) are always segfaulting: And there was nothing else updated at

Bug#697357: bridging broken over bond interfaces

2013-01-22 Thread Bastian Blank
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 09:25:35PM +0100, Ferenc Wagner wrote: > Bastian Blank writes: > > You want to use Open vSwitch for such setups. > Somewhat offtopic, but I left in the Cc-s to get it documented: why > should we prefer Open vSwitch over standard Linux bonding, bridge and &g

Bug#698225: linux-image-2.6.32-5-686-bigmem: split-brain when running "drbdadm primary $DEV" with dual primary setup in Sec/Sec state

2013-01-15 Thread Bastian Blank
Control: tags -1 moreinfo On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 03:18:11PM +0100, b...@bc-bd.org wrote: > Issue > drbdadm primary $DEV > On both nodes at the same time (either via cluster resource manager, or mssh) > will lead to a split brain: This does not match the kernel log, as far as I understand

Bug#697357: bridging broken over bond interfaces

2013-01-04 Thread Bastian Blank
On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 12:17:12PM +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote: > I tried to set up a new KVM host in the usual way: > - have a bond0 interface over all physcial eth* interfaces > - create a br0 over that bond0 and any vnet* interfaces for the > guests. You want to use Open vSwitch for su

Bug#696292: For 9p root filesystems, kernel ignores root=$NAME option on command line, and uses /dev/root as mount tag

2012-12-19 Thread Bastian Blank
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 06:50:36PM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote: > On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 12:38:55AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > When using an initramfs, implementation of the 'root' kernel parameter > > is the responsibility of the initramfs! > I'm not using an initramfs. The kernel supports 9

Bug#695243: linux: Add stage1 build-profile support for bootstrapping

2012-12-06 Thread Bastian Blank
On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 12:53:53PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote: > The binary packages and control files for intermediate stages do *not* > need to comply with normal policy. Where is the spec for this then? The binary packages still need a different version so they can't be mistaken. >

Re: Bug#695243: linux: Add stage1 build-profile support for bootstrapping

2012-12-06 Thread Bastian Blank
On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 02:16:16AM +, Wookey wrote: > In order to bootstrap a new architecture, a cross-toolchain must be > built. A suitable linux-libc-dev_$arch package is needed for this. In > order to make this (and cross-toolchain builds in general) > automatable, the packaging needs to be

Bug#539201: (no subject)

2012-11-29 Thread Bastian Blank
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 08:30:37PM +0530, dE . wrote: > This's still not fixed? Get a name and send a patch. Bastian -- We fight only when there is no other choice. We prefer the ways of peaceful contact. -- Kirk, "Spectre of the Gun", stardate 4385.3 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai

Bug#693568: linux-image-3.6-trunk-amd64: audit subsystem is far too chatty

2012-11-18 Thread Bastian Blank
On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 11:05:56PM +, brian m. carlson wrote: > As you can see in the logs below, the audit subsystem logs entirely too > many audit messages. It is rate limited. And one event every 30 seconds is not that much. >Since I use chro

Bug#693042: linux: please support arch powerpcspe

2012-11-13 Thread Bastian Blank
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 01:24:06PM +0100, Roland Stigge wrote: > --- linux-3.2.32.backup/debian/config/powerpcspe/defines 1970-01-01 > 01:00:00.0 +0100 > +++ linux-3.2.32/debian/config/powerpcspe/defines 2012-11-12 > 13:16:36.292183624 +0100 > @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@ > +[base] > +flavou

Bug#502845: open-iscsi: login fails using 64-bit kernel with 32-bit userland

2012-11-12 Thread Bastian Blank
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 04:18:44PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote: > The test is probably right; i386 and (presumably) x32 are the only > architectures that don't have 64-bit alignment for long long. They haven't fixed this stupidity in x32? Bastian -- Where there's no emotion, there's no motive fo

Bug#693042: linux: please support arch powerpcspe

2012-11-12 Thread Bastian Blank
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 05:19:36PM +0100, Roland Stigge wrote: > On 12/11/12 13:35, Bastian Blank wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 01:24:06PM +0100, Roland Stigge wrote: > >> I'm attaching a patch that supports powerpcspe [1] in linux. > >> This is a follow-up f

Bug#693042: linux: please support arch powerpcspe

2012-11-12 Thread Bastian Blank
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 01:24:06PM +0100, Roland Stigge wrote: > I'm attaching a patch that supports powerpcspe [1] in linux. > This is a follow-up for http://bugs.debian.org/593340 Please provide a patch that re-uses the existing config files. I will not accept full configs any longer. If you ne

Bug#689429: vmxnet3 driver with package drops on ESXi 5.0

2012-10-05 Thread Bastian Blank
On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 04:26:49PM +0200, Patrick Matthäi wrote: > Using ESXi 5.0 with Linux guests (in this case many amd64 Squeeze > machines with three vmxnet3 adapter for each VM) could cause package > drops, here especially on using UDP (name resolving). So I saw that > some machines produced

Re: [PATCH 3/3] install-files: Include modules.{builtin,order} in Linux kernel-image udebs

2012-09-25 Thread Bastian Blank
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 02:07:16AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > libkmod expects these files to be present. However they are not > being installed in the s390 tape image packages, so this probably > should be made conditional. That might be a bug in the linux package > though. Bastian? This is

Bug#687254: linux-image-3.2.0-3-amd64: Using i915, after login from gdm, screen goes black, and only a reboot helps.

2012-09-11 Thread Bastian Blank
Control: severity -1 important On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 11:12:35AM +0300, Daniel Landau wrote: > ** Tainted: O (4096) > * Out-of-tree module has been loaded. > > ** Loaded modules: > vboxpci(O) > vboxnetadp(O) > vboxnetflt(O) > vboxdrv(O) We don't support systems in this state. Please remove the

Bug#666386: more info

2012-09-01 Thread Bastian Blank
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 05:52:03PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: > auto vlan2 > iface vlan2 inet manual > vlan-raw-device xenbr0 Is vlan-over-bridge documented to be supported? Usually I would use: | iface xenbr2 inet static | bridge-ports bond0.2 > But as soon as I generate any traffic to or fr

Re: [RFR] templates://firmware-nonfree/{templates/templates.license.in}

2012-08-26 Thread Bastian Blank
On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 02:00:22PM +0100, Justin B Rye wrote: > Should I revise the package descriptions? Most of the synopses have > unnecessary capitalistation, and there are lots of lists that could > accommodate extra commas, but before I start I'm wondering about those > huge verbatim lines.

Re: Byte queue limits in Linux for wheezy / linux kernel ABI bumps

2012-08-13 Thread Bastian Blank
On Sun, Aug 05, 2012 at 07:43:50PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > On Sat, Aug 04, 2012 at 10:06:48PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > A possible solution would be something like: > > 1. Keep multiple versions of udebs in the same suite (currently possible > > for arch:all, bu

Re: autobuilding src:nvidia-* [non-free]

2012-08-07 Thread Bastian Blank
On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 07:03:16PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: > Copying debian-release@ and debian-kernel@ on what they think. To provide > context (it seems that pkg-nvidia-devel@ dropped my mails or put it into a > queue, hence they're not in a list archive): nvidia-graphics-modules seems to > be

Re: Byte queue limits in Linux for wheezy / linux kernel ABI bumps

2012-08-05 Thread Bastian Blank
On Sat, Aug 04, 2012 at 10:06:48PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > A possible solution would be something like: > 1. Keep multiple versions of udebs in the same suite (currently possible > for arch:all, but maybe not supported for arch-dependent packages) Breaks the expectations within d-i. This is

Bug#682007: linux-image-3.2.0-0.bpo.2-amd64: NULL pointer dereference in __fscache_read_or_alloc_pages

2012-07-19 Thread Bastian Blank
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 11:16:33AM -0500, Brian Kroth wrote: > ** Tainted: PO (4097) > * Proprietary module has been loaded. > * Out-of-tree module has been loaded. > 21:04:00 kefka [187206.183487] Pid: 20810, comm: MATLAB Tainted: P > O 3.2.0-0.bpo.2-amd64 #1 We don't support proprietary stuff

Re: Featureset patches in linux-source package

2012-06-04 Thread Bastian Blank
On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 06:21:12AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > Index: debian/rules.real > === > --- debian/rules.real (revision 19077) > +++ debian/rules.real (working copy) > @@ -82,18 +91,19 @@ > $(call patch_cmd,all) >

Re: Linux features for wheezy

2012-06-04 Thread Bastian Blank
On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 04:58:42AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > Index: debian/bin/genorig.py > === > --- debian/bin/genorig.py (revision 19075) > +++ debian/bin/genorig.py (working copy) This is independant from the 3.0 switc

Re: Linux features for wheezy

2012-06-03 Thread Bastian Blank
On Sun, Jun 03, 2012 at 02:53:40PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Sun, 2012-06-03 at 15:15 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 11:47:03PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > > - lguest (#457652) > > No. This is no tool, this is an example. > But

Re: Linux features for wheezy

2012-06-03 Thread Bastian Blank
On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 11:47:03PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > - [linux-tools] build more tools: > - hv (something to do with Hyper-V; requested by MS) No Makefile, some daemon to return information about the system, hardcoded netlink stuff. > - usbip (#568362); the current usbip userland p

Bug#675164: linux-image-3.2.0-2-s390x - Dies with rcu_sched stalls

2012-05-30 Thread Bastian Blank
Source: linux-2.6 Version: 3.2.17-1 Severity: important The Wheezy kernel dies after showing the following message: | [55960.854495] INFO: r5] INFO: rcu_sched detected stall on CPU 1 (t=15001 jiffies) | [55960.854513] CPU: 1 Not tainted 3.2.0-2-s390x #1 | [55960.854518] Process swapper/1 (pid: 0

Bug#672353: IPv6 does not work

2012-05-10 Thread Bastian Blank
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 11:59:10AM +0200, Stéphane Glondu wrote: > ** Version: > Linux version 2.6.32-5-kirkwood (Debian 2.6.32-39squeeze1) (da...@debian.org) > (gcc version 4.3.5 (Debian 4.3.5-4) ) #1 Thu Jan 12 01:10:21 UTC 2012 This is not -44. We expect users to reboot after an upgrade. Bast

Re: Architecture qualification for wheezy - status of Linux kernel

2012-05-07 Thread Bastian Blank
On Sun, May 06, 2012 at 11:24:48PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > * s390/s390x: Actively supported upstream by IBM. Sometimes to actively supported. :-) >Only runs in virtual > machines, It runs in three different environments: Bare hardware, LP

Bug#671238: linux-image-2.6.32-5-s390x: no CMM with z/VM Resource Manager possible

2012-05-03 Thread Bastian Blank
severity 671238 important thanks On Wed, May 02, 2012 at 07:12:45PM +0200, Martin Grimm wrote: > CMM (Cooperative Memory Management) can't be controlled from z/VM > Resource Manager because the core component (cmm) is builtin and > the needed communication module (smsgiucv) is build as a module. >

Bug#669640: Unknown symbol in module (Error: could not insert module /lib/modules/3.2.0-2-powerpc64/kernel/fs/fat/vfat.ko)

2012-04-20 Thread Bastian Blank
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 01:33:34PM -0400, Douglas Mencken wrote: > >> # insmod /lib/modules/3.2.0-2-powerpc64/kernel/fs/fat/vfat.ko > >> Error: could not insert module > >> /lib/modules/3.2.0-2-powerpc64/kernel/fs/fat/vfat.ko: Unknown symbol in > >> module This means you have to reboot. And plea

Re: [RFC] include DTB in linux-image files on armel

2012-04-20 Thread Bastian Blank
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 11:11:27AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > -install-image_armel_$(FEATURESET)_$(FLAVOUR)_plain_image \ > +ifneq ($(filter armel,$(ARCH)),) > +install-image_$(ARCH)_$(FEATURESET)_$(FLAVOUR)_plain_image: What is this supposed to do? Bastian -- Youth doesn't excuse everything.

Uploading linux-2.6 (3.2.13-1)

2012-03-27 Thread Bastian Blank
Hi folks I intend to upload linux-2.6 3.2.13-1 later this evening. It should fix s390x build. Bastian -- Those who hate and fight must stop themselves -- otherwise it is not stopped. -- Spock, "Day of the Dove", stardate unknown -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ.

Bug#665711: [linux-image-rt-amd64] please suggest installation of linux-headers-rt-amd64 package

2012-03-25 Thread Bastian Blank
On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 01:23:39PM +0200, Steffen Moeller wrote: > Whom do I tell ... You know that of course, but many users are not aware of > that headers meta package and it comes very handy when updating the kernel. I > hence suggest to suggest it. It will help all those e.g. with an NVidia

Bug#660554: [Pkg-xen-devel] Boot process hangs then reboots when using Xen + Linux 3.2

2012-03-02 Thread Bastian Blank
On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 01:20:17PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote: > Replacing BUG_ON by a WARN_ON, and adding #define DEBUG 1 on top of > dma_v2.c, my kernel booted, and I had the attached dmesg output. Please provide /proc/interrupts from all four cases (32/64, xen/non-xen) and the Xen APIC-state (

Uploading linux-2.6 (3.2.7-1)

2012-02-27 Thread Bastian Blank
Hi folks I intend to upload linux-2.6 3.2.7-1 tomorrow, after 3.2.6-1 landed recently in testing. Appart from the new upstream stable release, this includes several config changes. Hopefully it does not contain more changes to the ABI then already found. Bastian -- Vulcans do not approve of vi

Re: linux-2.6_3.2.6-1+ppc64_ppc64.changes ACCEPTED

2012-02-25 Thread Bastian Blank
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 10:51:59PM +, Debian Ports Archive Maintainer wrote: > Accepted: linux-2.6_3.2.6-1+ppc64_ppc64.changes The main linux-2.6 package already supports ppc64. Is this not longer maintained and should be removed completely? Bastian -- Vulcans never bluff. -

Bug#633423: Problem with autofs 64-bit kernel/32-bit userspace compatibility

2012-02-24 Thread Bastian Blank
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 07:50:05PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 08:15:09PM +0100, Sven Joachim wrote: > [...] > > Thankfully this problem has now been communicated to Linus himself, and > > he agreed that it should be fixed in the kernel. > Of course it should. A shame tha

Bug#633423: Problem with autofs 64-bit kernel/32-bit userspace compatibility

2012-02-24 Thread Bastian Blank
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 08:15:09PM +0100, Sven Joachim wrote: > Short summary for readers new to the bug: boot hangs with i386 systemd > and an x86_64 kernel. Care to explain why it hangs and not dies? Bastian -- Conquest is easy. Control is not. -- Kirk, "Mirror, Mirror", sta

Bug#660446: linux-image-3.2.0-1-4kc-malta: Should include built-in support for ext4

2012-02-22 Thread Bastian Blank
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 11:49:19PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > Uhm, I politely disagree. Why? Why add ext4fs but not, The same as for mips. No initrd, but d-i uses ext4 as default now. > @porters: are there subarchitectures that cannot deal with > loading an initrd as part of the normal boots

Bug#660446: linux-image-3.2.0-1-4kc-malta: Should include built-in support for ext4

2012-02-22 Thread Bastian Blank
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 10:32:01AM +0100, Willi Mann wrote: > Please change ext4 support from module to built-in for this kernel, as it's > done > for ext2 and ext3. m68k is also affected. No initramfs, but ext2/ext3 built-in. I'll change that also. Bastian -- You canna change the laws of phys

Re: Sparc netboot image is too large to boot (again)

2012-02-18 Thread Bastian Blank
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 08:00:24PM +, Jurij Smakov wrote: > Attached patch implements the switch. It's not particularly elegant, > but minimally intrusive, only affecting the building ot sparc's > netboot image. I would like to commit it some time next week, unless > anyone objects. I would

Bug#659948: [initramfs-tools] Fails to upgrade (Sid)

2012-02-15 Thread Bastian Blank
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 01:33:12PM +0200, David Baron wrote: > > Please provide your /etc/fstab > Note: does not explicitly call for rootfs mount! No. rootfs is a kernel implementation detail. It will not show up in fstab. > > How did you set up your system? debian-installer? > This started out a

Re: How to tell users that ia32-libs will go away

2012-02-10 Thread Bastian Blank
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 01:00:50PM +0100, Bernhard R. Link wrote: > From a user's point of view I'd really appreciate if that package could be > kept. It is a burden for the archive and other infrastructure. > Needing multi-arch enabled (with all the dangers of getting the > wrong packages

Re: Sparc netboot image is too large to boot (again)

2012-02-05 Thread Bastian Blank
On Sun, Feb 05, 2012 at 02:09:11PM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > AIUI, linux can now have support for uncompressing bzip2, lzma and lzo. CONFIG_RD_GZIP=y CONFIG_RD_BZIP2=y CONFIG_RD_LZMA=y CONFIG_RD_XZ=y CONFIG_RD_LZO=y The amd64 image have support for gzip, bzip2, lzma and the xz variant. Bas

Uploading linux-2.6 (3.2.4-1)

2012-02-05 Thread Bastian Blank
Hi I intend to upload linux-2.6 3.2.4-1 later today. It fixes the mips FTBFS and also includes the pci-e power management (aspm) rework. Bastian -- Love sometimes expresses itself in sacrifice. -- Kirk, "Metamorphosis", stardate 3220.3 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kerne

Re: Bug#605090: Linux 3.2 in wheezy

2012-02-03 Thread Bastian Blank
On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 10:50:07PM +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > On mer., 2012-02-01 at 19:14 +0100, Bastian Blank wrote: > > Since 3.1 or so it is not longer possible to use this package as source > > in terms of the GPL like the udebs have done for several releases. > Could

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >