On Mon, Oct 31, 2005 at 05:31:03PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 31 Oct 2005 16:43:57 +0900
Horms [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The reason that it has been changed from modular to builtin,
is that making it modular was a somewhat
.
(not sure what to do about it, though...)
I'd much more suspect an ACPI problem, than a console problem.
But it would be nice verify this before passing it on upstream.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Oct 31, 2005 at 06:10:29PM +0100, Benoît Dejean wrote:
Package: linux-image-2.6.14-1-powerpc
Version: 2.6.14-1
Severity: normal
Hi. It looks like sound modules are broken on ppc. I'm attaching dmesg
errors.
Just a wild stab in the dark, does runing alsaconf help?
--
Horms
card.
Jaroslav,
Just to recap what is at http://bugs.debian.org/319789/, which isn't
much. It seems that snd_via82xx isn't handling the MPU of a VIA82C686
as expected. The problem seems to have been around since at least 2.6.8
and has been confirmed in 2.6.14.
Regards
--
Horms
Is there any chance that #336103 is related to this?
http:://bugs.debian.org/336103
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 09:02:23PM -0700, Jonas Bevren wrote:
Horms,
Thanks for the attention.
Your note mentions a kernel that doesnt exist (2.6.26-5.99.sarge1).
however, I made a guess at your intent being the 2.6.12-5.99 kernel,
and tested it.
I recorded a session log from
been changed from modular to builtin,
is that making it modular was a somewhat problematic patch.
I hope we can find a solution that doesn't lead us back to
that code.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
of making SECURITY_CAPABILITIES modular.
Luke,
Can you or any of the other SE Linux people comment on this?
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
reassign 268583 linux-2.6
thanks
Could any of the affected parties verify this is still a problem
with 2.6.12-4. I expect it is, but it would be good to verify.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
for them?
I believe that this is a 2.4.27 bug. 2.4.27-11, the sid version,
still has this bug. I am still looking for someone to test or
comment on the patch I posted. Though I am tempted to put it
into 2.4.27-12 untested.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
reassign 335733 linux-source-2.6.14
found 335733 2.6.14-1
thanks
This fix has been accepted into Linus' tree and should appear in 2.6.15
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
fine.
Excellent. I believe the current plan is to re-release on Monday.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and it should go into -2, soon.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
a duplicate of 336295, lets track it there.
http://bugs.debian.org/336295
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Oct 14, 2005 at 05:02:54PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Horms [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 01:27:27PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 06:24:20AM -0500, Geiger Guenter wrote:
This means that it has to be dropped. Thats ok with me
some more.
This is a possibility I was aware of when I changed to code to drop the
module_mutex before calling mod-init(), years ago. Sorry it took so
long.
Thanks, very much appreciated. Hopefully this solves our woes.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
), the mount
behaves in a case-insensitive manner, but of course I don't want filenames
to be shown as ISO8859-1 in userspace..
Ack, I see that too (2.6.14-rc4). Now to find out why.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is it possible for you to see if this problem also exists in 2.6.12?
There is a 2.6.12-5.99.sarge1 backport at
http://packages.vergenet.net/testing/linux-2.6/
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to the problem I outlined above.
My question is: Is this behaviour correct, or is it a bug?
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
://packages.vergenet.net/testing/linux-2.6-2.6.14/linux-2.6_2.6.14-1-hppa.log.gz
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
. But I think I am seeing
this problem too, so I guess there is a hole in there somewhere.
--
Horms
On Sat, Oct 29, 2005 at 12:07:40AM +0900, OGAWA Hirofumi wrote:
OGAWA Hirofumi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Horms [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
static struct nls_table table = {
.charset= utf8,
.uni2char = uni2char,
.char2uni = char2uni
partition using
-oiocharset=utf8. If I use -oisocharset=iso8859-1 (the default), the mount
behaves in a case-insensitive manner
The kernel produces a big fat warning in the kernel log for this, as the
kernel don't know about case conversation in utf-8 mode
Thanks
--
Horms
On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 01:48:21PM -0700, Chip Salzenberg wrote:
tags 335969 +upstream
thanks
On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 03:58:47PM +0900, Horms wrote:
Is there any chance you could ping the upsteam maintainers on this?
Have done. Upstream says: fixed in 2.6.13. Do you think we'll
On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 08:56:27PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
On Mon, 2005-10-24 at 19:39 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
* dann frazier:
Horms: I realize you might be somewhat out of the loop as to how we're
abusing your directory tree; I'll catch you on IRC when you're back
On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 12:23:40AM -0600, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 02:39:24PM +0900, Horms wrote:
On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 10:52:02PM -0600, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 01:35:14PM +0900, Horms wrote:
That looks a lot like the error I was seeing last
On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 12:19:16AM -0600, Grant Grundler wrote:
On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 02:39:24PM +0900, Horms wrote:
Actually, I just poked around in there, as it seemed like
everyone else was busy doing other things.
in there? Where?
In svn.debian.org, where the Debian kernels live
/2005/08/msg00030.html
In a nutshell, it wasn't in 2.6.8 or 2.4.27. And it was fixed 2.6.12-2.
Its probably worth of a CVE, but from Debian persipective, both
sarge and etch are clean.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 09:21:39AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 01:32:03PM +0900, Horms wrote:
On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 12:51:06AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
Well, the problem is that the outside-of-tree modules are rather a pain
to us,
since we have no good
forward it there if you like, but it might be just as easy for you
to do it and CC this bug.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
a preliminary layout, but nothing has been set
in stone yet). Indeed, until a release hits Sid, I would say nothing
is set in stone.
Understood, my comments and bug report were only intended
as part of the development process for the experimenatl release.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
is underdocumented,
and I'd like to get that fixed.
* Which role does module-assistant play here?
* If one builds kernels with make-kpkg, should one make use of make-kpkg
also build the modules, or should one use module-assistant instead?
That I am also unsure about.
--
Horms
-2.6.14_2.6.13+2.6.14-rc5-0experimental.1.
I'll poke around and try (again) to get it in the next release, which will
probably be 2.6.14-1, and probably very soon.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 11:16:43AM +0900, Horms wrote:
On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 03:40:06PM -0500, Adam Heath wrote:
This bug was tagged pending on Aug 24, and was s upposed to be fixed in -6.
However, we are at -10, and it is still broken.
Hi Adam,
Sorry about that, it does indeed still
On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 03:26:52PM +0900, Horms wrote:
On Sat, Oct 22, 2005 at 01:24:03AM +0800, Dan Jacobson wrote:
Package: linux-patch-debian-2.6.12
Severity: wishlist
$ apt-cache show linux-patch-debian-2.6.12
Description: Debian patches to version 2.6.12 of the Linux kernel
archive. . This
I see a .
Thanks, that seems to be a bug in the code that generates the control file.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-by: Chris Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
the bug should probably be closed.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
'.
Otherwise it's the 15 min ls -l / /dev/null cron job :-S
The kernel is from APT the modules loaded are by hotplug - no custom
stuff. powermgmt-base is installed, but that's about it.
Your disks are failing, get new ones if you value your data.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 01:19:24PM -0400, Aaron S. Hawley wrote:
Package: linux-source-2.6.12
Version: 2.6.12-10
Severity: minor
Attached is a small patch that fixes this potential minor confusion.
Aaron, isn't it wonderful how people seize the opportunity
for confusion.
Andrew, I'm
10.001 seems to fail to build linux-2.6
2.6.13+2.6.14-rc4-0experimental.1 on i386.
Its folating around in incoming/experimental.
I'll get a log of what goes wrong some time soon.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
to choose which one is used. However,
please be carful, as errors when rearanging your kernels and boot loader
could result in a system that does not boot.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to
find good maintainers for those packages.
That is preceicely the reason code should be merged upstream,
not patched onto the Debian kernel. Do you want to wear that pain?
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
the speed at which the rt2x00 driver is developped, I am pretty
sure the driver will be merged in the kernel before the etch release.
Awsome, I think the best thing to do with regards to this bug
is find out what needs to be done to make that happen, and if
possible, help out.
--
Horms
/debian/linux-2.6_2.6.13+2.6.14-rc5-0experimental.1.buildlog
That looks a lot like the error I was seeing last week.
Is anyone looking into it?
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
for the dpt_i2o
SCSI driver still oopses. Also, it has been reported that 2.6.13 that
should include all the upstream fixes hangs during dpt_i2o initialization
(see the previous message).
What about 2.6.14-rc5 ?
Jurij, could you send a link to or post the patch?
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 09:37:03AM +0200, Maximilian Attems wrote:
On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 12:52:59PM +0900, Horms wrote:
On Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 10:31:42AM +0200, Mathieu Roy wrote:
Package: linux-image-2.6.12-1-686
Version: 2.6.12-10
Severity: normal
Hello,
I suspect
On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 11:28:33PM +0100, Roger Gammans wrote:
On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 11:37:43AM +0900, Horms wrote:
On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 09:55:17PM +0100, Roger Gammans wrote:
More infomation I should have included the first time:
IDE Controller
Silicon Image 3112
failure rate...
Ok, that does sound like fair resoning, though I should
say that almost always these kind of errors show up faulty hardware.
In this case, its probably a bug.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
not, but testing is always good. Preemtion is known
to be probelmatic, so exploration of what combinations work
is always useful.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Oct 22, 2005 at 08:50:34PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 04:31:01PM +0200, Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
* Horms wrote:
I've put the packages in
http://packages.vergenet.net/testing/linux-2.6-2.6.13+2.6.14-rc4/
incase they dissapear from other sources
-2.6.x/2.6.12/linux-2.6.12-43-dirent_fix.dif
This should normally suffice to fix the SGI problem.
Thanks, I'll confine subseqent discussion to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
as debian packaging issues don't need to be on lkml.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 04:54:35PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
On Oct 21, Horms [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I did a bit of a poke around this symbols problem.
I puzzeled over it for a while. I began to wonder
if it might be caused byudevsynthesize[1] which seems
to be the major change
conflicts.
Perhaps you could try creating an initrd image using yarid or
initramfs-tools, as the former at least can make initrd images
that don't load up all ide modules.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(6caf69feb23a522921b5b12f572a94334183bc9f). This should cut down
the complexity of the backport of the second patch while maintaining
the functionality of the first.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
in contact with
upstream, I'm happy to help you out there.
Also, do you have any links to discussion of this problem upstream?
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 07:38:36AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 10:35:09AM +0900, Horms wrote:
On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 01:04:01PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
Hello,
[snip]
I'm pretty sure 2.4 currently FTBFS in sid. Looks like a tool chain
change. I think this occurs
On Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 09:44:07AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
On Oct 20, Horms [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could you please point me to the part of the code where udevd calls
modprobe and handles the subsequent SIGCHLD? That will be a good starting
poing
for further investigation
and not an udev bug (I checked udevd and it
looks fine to me) then looks like it is a kernel bug.
Could you please point me to the part of the code where udevd calls
modprobe and handles the subsequent SIGCHLD? That will be a good starting poing
for further investigation.
--
Horms
with a
2.6.14 upload to unstable in the weeks following the experimental upload.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 11:52:11PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
Horms [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
drivers/char/vt_ioctl.c: vt_ioctl(): line 377
/*
* To have permissions to do most of the vt ioctls, we either
* have
* to be the owner of the tty
was wondering about that too. I'm removing the patch tag for now.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
is overwhelmingly more likely than a kernel bug.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
for moving to .14
(or some -rc variant thereof). Its unlikelty to make much difference
on the initrd front and saves duplication of effort that is inherent
in the more branches approach.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
On Fri, Oct 14, 2005 at 07:35:46AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Fri, Oct 14, 2005 at 11:04:16AM +0900, Horms wrote:
On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 03:01:09PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 09:40:46PM +0900, Horms wrote:
On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 12:57:49PM +0200, Sven Luther
-2.6searchtype=all
It would be tremendously helpful if we could get linux-2.6 autobuilt in
experimental for all actitecters except mips and mipsel which are not
currently supported by the main upload, and perhaps m68k because it
takes so damn long it tends to get hand cross-compiled.
--
Horms
On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 02:59:30PM -0400, micah wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Horms,
I noticed that this patch is not applied to the 2.4.27 sarge1 update:
http://linux.bkbits.net:8080/linux-2.4/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The description reads: [XFS] Add nosymlinks inode
On Fri, Oct 14, 2005 at 08:04:46AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 03:26:45PM +0900, Horms wrote:
On Sun, Oct 09, 2005 at 02:21:04PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Sun, Oct 09, 2005 at 02:15:18PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
Hi all,
Ok, now that linux-2.6.13-1 has
.
Is there a burning desire to push this into 2.6.12 (sid/etch)?
I'd rather not duplicate the change there.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is this bug fixed in 2.6.12 or 13?
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is this still a problem in 2.6.12?
I know vesa is a bit screwy in 2.6.13 since we made it a non-module,
but that is a different problem.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is this still a problem in 2.6.12?
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
the 2.6.8 build, so I am looking
into that.
--
Horms
--- from-0001/drivers/usb/core/devio.c
+++ to-0003/drivers/usb/core/devio.c2005-10-14 16:50:10.0 +0900
@@ -30,6 +30,8 @@
* Revision history
*22.12.1999 0.1 Initial release (split from proc_usb.c)
*04.01.2000 0.2
because of its performance
overhead and limited usefulness. The debian-kernel list archive should
have some discussion about it.
It was already reenabled for 2.6.13 before this request came in.
Probably by Dilinger or Walidi, perhaps they can comment on the
performance issue.
--
Horms
, for which Harald wanted to push an additional patch, so
I guess it's the best to directly include this fix.
Will do, thanks for chasing this down, the numerous versions
of this fix that are floating around confused me somewhat.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 09:11:36AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
On Oct 13, Horms [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Today I found that the problem may belong to the udev utility. I
uninstalled it and made a shutdown -r. The 2.6.12 kernel starts without
any error. Reinstalling the udev utility
On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 09:38:42PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 01:32:56PM +0900, Horms wrote:
Nope, the latest are now provided by the linux-2.6 package as a legacy
compatibility thingy and depend on the linux-image 2.6.12 kernels. I think
from now
On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 10:04:57AM +0100, Alexander Fisher wrote:
On 10/3/05, Horms [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Oct 02, 2005 at 12:12:25PM -0700, Paul Traina wrote:
Package: linux-source-2.6.12
Version: 2.6.12-10
Followup-For: Bug #328513
Please turn on *BOTH
On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 12:33:09PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
On Oct 13, Horms [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks, should I reassign this to udev, or do you want to leave it here.
No way. If loading a kernel module breaks the system, it's a kernel bug.
Thanks for your positive response
I
On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 12:57:49PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 08:04:01PM +0900, Horms wrote:
On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 09:38:42PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
Also, if the user don't upgrade those, nothing major will break, apart
from
the fact that he has a few
been replaced by busybox-static in unstable,
hence the broken dependencies.
Thanks, this appears to be fixed in SVN, I've added this bug
number to the changelog so it will be closed on upload.
Jeff, Maks, any objectionsto uploading soon?
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 02:59:30PM -0400, micah wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Horms,
I noticed that this patch is not applied to the 2.4.27 sarge1 update:
http://linux.bkbits.net:8080/linux-2.4/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The description reads: [XFS] Add nosymlinks inode
On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 03:01:09PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 09:40:46PM +0900, Horms wrote:
On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 12:57:49PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 08:04:01PM +0900, Horms wrote:
On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 09:38:42PM +0200, Sven Luther
to be someone
there who has tested out sarge with 2.6 on that vintage of hardware.
In the mean time, my recommendation would be to stick with 2.4 unless
you want to get your hands dirty with some hacking.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe
reassign 328424 kernel
thanks
Sven, can you start a dialog with the relevant boot loader people about
this? Or alternatively, provide me with a list of such people and
I will start a dialog?
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble
http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/kernel/dists/sid/linux-2.6/debian/changelog?op=filerev=0sc=0
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
CONFIG_SECURITY_CAPABILITIES=y
Has anyone been able to confirm this? What is the mode of breakage?
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Oct 08, 2005 at 11:17:12PM -0700, Jurij Smakov wrote:
Hi,
I have made a commit (4357) to set the CONFIG_HPET_EMULATE_RTC option on
i386 to fix 309909. This required changing CONFIG_RTC from 'm' to 'y'. We
discussed it with Horms and Frederik some time ago and we agreed that it's
by another module. However
if this isn't the case, I guess setting it to yes is a good idea.
Does anyone know what this might break?
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
the scope of what is provided, and
clearly this is outside the current scope. I am closing this bug
accordingly.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
change the default value for this option to n,
a trivial patch should do this without any side-effects.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
, but please work with the intersted parties.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
statically.
If I recall, lsm wasn't well recieved upstream, in which case
dropping it is probably a good idea anyway.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 09:16:34AM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 01:32:56PM +0900, Horms wrote:
On Sat, Oct 08, 2005 at 09:20:44PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Sat, Oct 08, 2005 at 08:36:41PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
tags 331391 moreinfo
On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 10:30:42PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
Horms wrote:
I found three more security related reports/patches on linux-kernel.
As mentioned elsewhere, the first (request_key_auth memleek) is
CAN-2005-3119.
Can we get CAN numbers for the other two?
Here
on in the build chain.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Marco, I'm tagging it as upstream, as it is.
If anyone notices a fix upstream, please post it here.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 09:44:01PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 03:26:45PM +0900, Horms wrote:
On Sun, Oct 09, 2005 at 02:21:04PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Sun, Oct 09, 2005 at 02:15:18PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
Hi all,
Ok, now that linux-2.6.13-1 has
101 - 200 of 1044 matches
Mail list logo
