I see this bug is now 183 days old, but I fell into the same trap.
Recently, after upgrading to kernel-image-2.6.8-2-sparc64, The keyboard
got a wrong layout - pretty much every key know has another meaning.
Unfortunately, the the old 2.4 kernel is not bootable (silo has
forgotten about it) any
Hi,
So far the 2.6.27-rc5 seems to be stable, at least it hasn't crashed on
me. What can I do to help to get the needed fix to testing? (I know that
this kernel won't make it and that's a good thing, but I don't really
know how to identify what's needed to fix this).
Does this bug
Am Sonntag, den 14.12.2008, 23:50 +0100 schrieb Moritz Muehlenhoff:
On Mon, Sep 01, 2008 at 03:56:49PM +0200, Lukas Kolbe wrote:
Hi!
seeing if it is fixed in 2.6.27-rc5 might be more interesting.
thanks
2.6.27-rc5 has now been running fine in the guest for more than four
Hi Moritz,
Does this bug still persist with the current Lenny kernel?
Lucky me (sort of) - we stumbled upon this bug again on another server
(8 cores, 8 GB Ram) using 2.6.26-1-amd64_2.6.26-11, and fortune wants it
that it will be under heavy load tomorrow so that we can try the -12
kernel. I'll
Package: linux-image-2.6.26-1-amd64
Version: 2.6.26-3
Severity: important
Using kvm 72, the guest is started with:
kvm -smp 2 \
-net nic,macaddr=DE:AD:BE:EF:21:71,model=virtio \
-net tap,ifname=tap02,script=/etc/kvm/kvm-ifup \
-net nic,macaddr=DE:AD:BE:EF:21:72,model=virtio \
-net
maximilian attems wrote:
should be fixed in 2.6.26-4, should be available tomorrow in unstable.
otherwise find sid snapshots http://wiki.debian.org/DebianKernel
Sorry, but it crashed on me again - this time stuck in swapper.
[36037.786125] BUG: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for
4097s! [swapper:0]
Sorry, my previous answer didn't make it through my mail setup. I was
using 2.6.26-4snapshot.12144 when the crash happened. I'll try it with
the current snapshot again, though the changelog doesn't say anything
about actual changes :)
--
Lukas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
maximilian attems wrote:
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 02:36:00PM +0200, Lukas Kolbe wrote:
Sorry, my previous answer didn't make it through my mail setup. I was
using 2.6.26-4snapshot.12144 when the crash happened. I'll try it with
the current snapshot again, though the changelog doesn't say
Hi!
seeing if it is fixed in 2.6.27-rc5 might be more interesting.
thanks
2.6.27-rc5 has now been running fine in the guest for more than four
hours (and me restarting jboss every now and then). I'll report back tomorrow
evening, that would be the timeframe
the bug should've triggered.
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.32-9
Hi all,
we have numerous fileservers currently running variants of 2.6.30,
2.6.32 and 2.6.33. When we used 2.6.32-9 (with ABI version 3), we got
repeated crashes on one server in kswapd and flush. Three hours after
these traces, the machine crashed hard (no
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.33-1
Hi again,
we've just seen a very similar crash on a different host with 2.6.33-1.
After the last trace, the machine crashed. I'll report this to upstream
bugzilla as well and let you know about the bugnumber.
Mar 18 20:11:22 simon kernel: [87960.628069]
reported to bugzilla.kernel.org as
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15578
thanks,
Lukas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
Am Samstag, den 07.08.2010, 12:18 +0100 schrieb Ben Hutchings:
On Sat, 2010-08-07 at 11:21 +0200, Lukas Kolbe wrote:
Hi,
I sent this earlier today but the bug was archived so it didn't appear
anywhere, hence the resend.
I believe this issue is not fixed at all in 2.6.32-18. We have
Hi Ben,
Am Sonntag, den 08.08.2010, 03:36 +0100 schrieb Ben Hutchings:
This is not the same bug as was originally reported, which is that
virtio_net failed to retry refilling its RX buffer ring. That is
definitely fixed. So I'm treating this as a new bug report, #592187.
Okay, thanks.
So, testing begins.
First conclusion: not all traffic patterns produce the page allocation
failure. rdiff-backup only writing to an nfs-share does no harm;
rdiff-backup reading and writing (incremental backup) leads to (nearly
immediate) error.
The nfs-share is always mounted with proto=tcp and
Okay, next round: This time, 2.6.32-19 and virtio in guest, 2.6.32-18 in
the host and sadly, it's not fixed:
[ 159.772700] rdiff-backup.bi: page allocation failure. order:0, mode:0x20
[ 159.772708] Pid: 2524, comm: rdiff-backup.bi Not tainted 2.6.32-5-amd64 #1
[ 159.772710] Call Trace:
[
Am Mittwoch, den 11.08.2010, 04:13 +0100 schrieb Ben Hutchings:
On Mon, 2010-08-09 at 11:24 +0200, Lukas Kolbe wrote:
So, testing begins.
First conclusion: not all traffic patterns produce the page allocation
failure. rdiff-backup only writing to an nfs-share does no harm;
rdiff-backup
Am Mittwoch, den 11.08.2010, 04:28 +0100 schrieb Ben Hutchings:
I intend to upload linux-2.6 to unstable on Wednesday evening or
Thursday morning (GMT+1). This should fix the FTBFS, and contains many
other bug fixes besides. Let me know if there's anything I should wait
for.
If it is not
Hi Ben, Greg,
I was finally able to identify the patch series that introduced the fix
(they were introduced to -stable in 2.6.33.2):
cb63112 net: add __must_check to sk_add_backlog
a12a9a2 net: backlog functions rename
51c5db4 x25: use limited socket backlog
c531ab2 tipc: use limited socket
Hi all,
I was finally able to identify the patch series that introduced the fix
(they were introduced to -stable in 2.6.33.2):
cb63112 net: add __must_check to sk_add_backlog
a12a9a2 net: backlog functions rename
51c5db4 x25: use limited socket backlog
c531ab2 tipc: use limited
works smoothly. I'd really love
to see a stable 2.6.32 ...
thanks,
greg k-h
Regards,
Lukas Kolbe
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org
On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 09:32 +0200, Lukas Kolbe wrote:
Hi,
I was finally able to identify the patch series that introduced the fix
(they were introduced to -stable in 2.6.33.2):
cb63112 net: add __must_check to sk_add_backlog
a12a9a2 net: backlog functions rename
51c5db4 x25
Am Montag, den 30.08.2010, 10:21 -0700 schrieb Greg KH:
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 09:46:36AM -0700, David Miller wrote:
From: Greg KH g...@kroah.com
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 07:50:17 -0700
As I stated above, I need the ACK from David to be able to add these
patches.
David?
I
Who's done the checks to find out any problems with these patches?
I'll skim the changelogs in 2.6.3[345].x to see if there are any related
patches.
This is all I could find in current 2.6.36-rc2 (via git log | grep,
minus rps/rfs patches). I don't know anything about these, but they
sound
On Tue, 2010-08-31 at 06:35 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 10:16:56AM +0200, Lukas Kolbe wrote:
Am Montag, den 30.08.2010, 10:21 -0700 schrieb Greg KH:
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 09:46:36AM -0700, David Miller wrote:
From: Greg KH g...@kroah.com
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 07
On Wed, 2010-09-01 at 05:26 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Tue, 2010-08-31 at 17:34 +0200, Lukas Kolbe wrote:
On Tue, 2010-08-31 at 06:35 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
[...]
Then how about convincing the Debian kernel developers to accept these
patches, and work through any regressions
Am Donnerstag, den 09.09.2010, 04:23 +0100 schrieb Ben Hutchings:
On Tue, 2010-09-07 at 13:25 +0200, Lukas Kolbe wrote:
On Wed, 2010-09-01 at 05:26 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Tue, 2010-08-31 at 17:34 +0200, Lukas Kolbe wrote:
On Tue, 2010-08-31 at 06:35 -0700, Greg KH wrote
27 matches
Mail list logo
