On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 12:39:47AM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 04:09:54PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
My plan is therefore to:
1) Commit these changes for inclusion in the next linux-2.6 upload
2) After that upload, I will file an RC bug to request
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 11:45:54PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
On 2010-03-30, dann frazier da...@debian.org wrote:
drbd maintainers,
As you no doubt know, linux-modules-extra has been dropped for
squeeze. The recommended[1] direction for building out-of-tree module
is to either
Package: release-notes
Severity: normal
As mentioned in [1], the vserver featureset is planned to be removed
from the Debian linux kernel after the squeeze release. Debian suggests that
users consider migrating vserver systems to either the LXC (Linux Containers)
features of the upstream kernel
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 11:30:31AM -0400, David Miller wrote:
I've also been bitten by this bug - noticed it last Friday and it
doesn't seem to be fixed this morning.
Is there an ETA on a fix with packages?
Packages are now available in the security repo (an apt-get upgrade
should suffice).
version (2.6.26-6+lenny1) in
stable = new version (2.6-26-6+lenny2) targeted at proposed-updates.
Looks like a typo in the version string (2.6-26 vs. 2.6.26) - will
correct and reupload.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 06:50:58PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
On 2010-03-15, dann frazier da...@debian.org wrote:
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 11:30:31AM -0400, David Miller wrote:
I've also been bitten by this bug - noticed it last Friday and it
doesn't seem to be fixed this morning
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 07:39:58PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 12:13:06PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 06:50:58PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
On 2010-03-15, dann frazier da...@debian.org wrote:
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 11:30:31AM
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 02:45:13PM -0400, David Miller wrote:
dann frazier wrote:
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 11:30:31AM -0400, David Miller wrote:
I've also been bitten by this bug - noticed it last Friday and it
doesn't seem to be fixed this morning.
Is there an ETA on a fix
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 08:45:46PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 01:39:08PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 07:39:58PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 12:13:06PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 06
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 04:06:41PM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
]] dann frazier
| A coworker was seeing the same symptoms on a system from the
| same-era loaned me the system to debug. The issue ended up being
| due to a change in the SRAT table, and a backport of the following
| fixed
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+drbd8 (2:8.0.14-2+lenny1) stable-security; urgency=high
+
+ * Update for connector API change in linux-2.6_2.6.26-21lenny4
+(Closes: #573490)
+ * Restrict netlink calls to users with CAP_SYS_ADMIN (CVE Requested)
+
+ -- dann frazier da...@debian.org Thu, 11 Mar 2010 15:47:53
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 09:43:45PM +0100, Tomas Pospisek wrote:
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.26-21lenny4
Severity: critical
drbd fails to load and there goes my failover high available cluster...
*t
well, crap - we ignored that ABI change because google showed only an
old/deprecated
months.
Until then, your customers are welcome to add proposed-updates to
their sources.list. Builds for all other architectures should appear
over the next several days.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble
tags 573490 + patch
affects 573490 drbd8-source
thanks
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 02:38:23PM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 09:43:45PM +0100, Tomas Pospisek wrote:
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.26-21lenny4
Severity: critical
drbd fails to load and there goes my
A coworker was seeing the same symptoms on a system from the
same-era loaned me the system to debug. The issue ended up being
due to a change in the SRAT table, and a backport of the following
fixed it for me.
I've committed it to the lenny branch - would you be able to test it?
commit
On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 09:35:05PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 12:45:08PM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 08:02:13PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 08:01:14PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
Source: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.26
.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100305164723.ga24...@lackof.org
Source: tgt
Version: 1:1.0.1-1
Severity: serious
tgt runs dh_testroot in the build rule. I believe this violates
section 4.9 of Debian Policy which states:
The build target must not do anything that might require root
privilege.
Relevant piece of build log follows:
[...]
/usr/bin/make -C
important,
not yet reviewed by dannf.
ACK; I'll look at this soon.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100219194508.ga17...@lackof.org
On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 08:27:17PM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
]] dann frazier
| On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 05:01:15PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
| On Sat, 2010-02-13 at 17:00 +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
| Package: linux-2.6
| Version: 2.6.26-21lenny3
| Severity: normal
that this is a production machine and you are not likely to be able to
do this soon.
I'll see if I can hunt one of these systems down...
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http
previously?
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
hey Vitaliy/Ola,
The fixes for CVE-2010-0307 remove the TIF_ABI_PENDING bit from
arch-specific code. Since this #define no longer exists, our openvz
patch needs to be updated to not reference it.
It looks as though openvz only references to clear all arch-specific
flags, so I prepared the
On Tue, Feb 09, 2010 at 08:45:53PM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
Hi Dann
What was TIF_ABI_PENDING defined to earlier?
I assume this is not a problem, however Vitaliy knows this
in much more details so I want him to look at this as well.
Take a look at this change for the details:
On Fri, Feb 05, 2010 at 05:25:43PM +0100, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
Okay, I just rejected linux-2.6_2.6.32-7_alpha.changes,
linux-2.6_2.6.32-7_hppa.changes, linux-2.6_2.6.32-7_i386.changes,
linux-2.6_2.6.32-7_ia64.changes and
avoid accepting
the other archs? i386, in particular, will cause a lot of problems.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Source: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.32-7
Severity: grave
This release is known to cause boot problems on 32-bit systems w/ a
64-bit kernel:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/946249
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
Source: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.32-7
Severity: serious
I tried to do a local build of trunk on powerpc, and hit the following
bug (apparently introduced in 2.6.32-7):
cc1: warnings being treated as errors
/tmp/buildd/linux-2.6-2.6.32/debian/build/source_powerpc_none/arch/powerpc/kernel/time.c:
On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 12:53:23PM -0700, Troy Heber wrote:
Source: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.32-3
Severity: wishlist
Currently Ftrace is enabled in the kernel, CONFIG_FTRACE=y and
CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE=y. However, some the most useful tracers, such
as CONFIG_FUNCTION_TRACER and
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 10:50:16PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Mon, 2010-01-25 at 20:19 +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
* Ben Hutchings (b...@decadent.org.uk) [100125 20:14]:
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 08:02:31PM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
* Julien Cristau (jcris...@debian.org) [100125
Please try 2.6.32. 2.6.32 is in sid and can be installed on squeeze systems.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 02:22:37PM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
On Mon, Jan 04, 2010 at 01:12:56AM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
On Sunday 03 January 2010, dann frazier wrote:
Thanks. This suggests that the fixes for CVE-2009-0029 are causal. To
verify, can you test this kernel which drops only
8f7b0ba1c853919b85b54774775f567f30006107
As well as these two patches on top of them:
http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1169784
http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1169785
Thanks Sergey.
Would you mind filing a bug for these so it can be tracked?
--
dann frazier
On Mon, Jan 04, 2010 at 01:12:56AM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
On Sunday 03 January 2010, dann frazier wrote:
Thanks. This suggests that the fixes for CVE-2009-0029 are causal. To
verify, can you test this kernel which drops only those fixes?
zelenka.debian.org:~dannf/linux-headers-2.6.18-6
-s390_2.6.18.dfsg.1-26etch1+nocve20090029_s390.deb
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 12:04:00AM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
On Tuesday 29 December 2009, dann frazier wrote:
I don't see an obvious cause for the failure. Can you try booting
24etch1 in an effort to bisect the failure? In case you can't find the
deb (I couldn't) I've built one that you can
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 01:32:01PM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 02:02:25PM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
We have several pending changes, plus we need to merge in the latest
DSAs. I'll plan on uploading tomorrow, so let me know if you have any
changes pending that might
and commit it. If you do want to avoid new
binary packages, feel free to revert before uploading.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
for 2.6.32
as well, but it would help if I had some allies at Debian.
That's definitely the right approach for 2.6.32/squeeze thanks.
If stable@ rejects it, please let us know.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe
/gmane.linux.ports.parisc/2403 for a testcase.
This testcase emits warnings and works after been fixed on paer.
Bastian
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
a patch ready for 2.6.32. Of course, that means new
binary packages, so if we want to avoid NEW processing I can hold off
on committing...
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 06:30:21PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 11:10:15AM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 05:54:29PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
I intend to upload linux-2.6, linux-latest-2.6 and firmware-nonfree
tonight.
There should
After upgrading the buildds to 2.6.32, emacs23 builds fine.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
).
Would it be possible, to incorporate this patch into Debian's official
kernel?
If that workaround gets accepted upstream, then we can likely backport
it.
See:
http://wiki.debian.org/DebianKernelPatchAcceptanceGuidelines
But it sounds like the real issue here maybe with X?
--
dann frazier
On Sat, Dec 05, 2009 at 04:48:59PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Thu, Dec 03, 2009 at 10:04:52PM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
There's some security issues fixed in 2.6.32, so I'd like to see us
upload 2.6.32-1 relatively soon. How about an upload tomorrow?
Okay, lets do
On Sun, Dec 06, 2009 at 09:51:12AM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
On Sat, Dec 05, 2009 at 04:48:59PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Thu, Dec 03, 2009 at 10:04:52PM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
There's some security issues fixed in 2.6.32, so I'd like to see us
upload 2.6.32-1 relatively soon
, if
it worked?
You can install the deb directly from sid, no need to recompile.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
hey,
There's some security issues fixed in 2.6.32, so I'd like to see us
upload 2.6.32-1 relatively soon. How about an upload tomorrow?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
. no
effect.
I also compiled a vanilla 2.6.31 kernel. no effect.
Please test the 2.6.32-rc8 in sid and let us know the results.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
);
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 11:27:59PM +0530, Mohan R wrote:
Package: linux-headers-2.6.26-2-amd64
Severity: minor
Hi,
A newcommer to Debian, forgive me if I do any mistakes, I'm trying to
compile broadcom-sta following http://wiki.debian.org/wl wiki page.
While installing
reassign 559069 linux-2.6
thanks
On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 11:46:15AM +0530, Mohan R wrote:
package linux-headers-2.6.26-2-amd64
severity 559069 wishlist
thanks
dann frazier wrote:
As far as Debian is concerned, its not a bug to use a compiler still
available in the distribution. It can
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 02:02:25PM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
We have several pending changes, plus we need to merge in the latest
DSAs. I'll plan on uploading tomorrow, so let me know if you have any
changes pending that might need more time.
The p-u processing isn't working at the moment
We have several pending changes, plus we need to merge in the latest
DSAs. I'll plan on uploading tomorrow, so let me know if you have any
changes pending that might need more time.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
The igb driver in stable currently supports these device:
#define E1000_DEV_ID_82575EB_COPPER 0x10A7
#define E1000_DEV_ID_82575EB_FIBER_SERDES 0x10A9
#define E1000_DEV_ID_82575GB_QUAD_COPPER 0x10D6
I obtained access to cards containing the first two chips[1] and did
some basic
maintaner of linux-image-2.6.30-bpo.2-686 is
Debian Kernel Team debian-kernel@lists.debian.org
The kernel team does not maintain the kernel in backports.org.
You can use the sid/squeeze binaries directly on lenny though.
So who could reenable CONFIG_ACPI_PROC_EVENT?
See #516079.
--
dann frazier
autoconf-scripts (notably strace) try to compile this program to
detect linux/netlink.h and consequently fail. Please revert the change that
remove the sub-includes from linux/socket.h
Thanks for testing!
Does anyone have an alternate fix, or should we just revert this for
now?
--
dann
/asound/card0/pcm0p/oss. It was working the day before I updated.
Can you revert to the 2.6.26-19lenny1 kernel and retest? I don't see
anything new in 19lenny2 that could obviously break this.
It would also be useful to verify w/o the nvidia driver loaded, if
possible.
--
dann frazier
to confirm that we're looking in the
right place.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
kernels and hope I could help out with that.
Thanks for the offer and the testing, but builds are done
automatically by the buildd infrastructure, not by the kernel
team. The issues w/ 2.6.31 should be worked out soon.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ
build until these changes are completed.
You can always do your own build from the source in the archive, or
from what is in svn.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Sun, Nov 01, 2009 at 04:37:06PM +0100, amuel...@targz.de wrote:
hey,
after 5 days of testing we got no further error messages and system did
not hang. So I assume that the bug is fixed. (used your testkernel)
Thanks in Advance!
Great, thanks for the verification.
--
dann frazier
There is a potential fix for this issue in the 2.6.26-20 kernel in
proposed-updates. Can someone who has seen this issue please verify
the fix?
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas
, quietly downgrade
it.
Or downgrade it w/ a pointer to this document, so it is clearly not personal.
If a submitter has done something stupid, request that they undo that
and report back. 'Sorry', and 'please' make a big difference in tone.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian
as it gets built, signed and uploaded.
As far
as I can tell, #542250 affects amd64 as well as i386/i686.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
of the backports.org people monitor this list -
you might try contacting them directly.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
jiffies = jiffies_64;
-endif
+#endif
SECTIONS
{
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
hey,
Here's a build that includes Ben's patch. If you have this hardware,
(or, for that matter, any hardware that uses igb) please test report
back your results.
http://people.debian.org/~dannf/bugs/522922
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 02:04:37PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
any objections against uploading 2.6.31 to unstable tomorrow?
fyi, ia64 is working fine (though there are no builds appearing in
experimental for whatever reason)
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel
Version: 2.6.28-1
This appears to have gone upstream in 2.6.27, so its first appearance
in debian would've been 2.6.28-1 (we skipped 2.6.27).
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 02:54:59PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
hey,
The kernel team is discussing the possibility of increase the default
value of mmap_min_addr in lenny (it has already been done for
sid). Obviously this has implications for the wine and dosemu packages
(are there others
, should we ask them to
somehow start setting this tunable themselves (e.g., by dropping in an
/etc/sysctl.d file)? Anyone know what Ubuntu is doing here?
[1] http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/kernel-sec/dsa-texts/2.6.26-19lenny1
(currently awaiting 1 more arch build)
--
dann frazier
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 09:37:42PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 13:24 -0600, dann frazier wrote:
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 07:37:33PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
I've collected quite a few bug fixes for 2.6.26-20. It seems like it
might be worth uploading to stable
-package basis. Do wine/dosemu have plans to do this? I wonder if
we should consider including something like that in stable?
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
?
The correct path is to get the necessary changes accepted upstream. We
can then backport the necessary fixes into new kernel releases.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
that we may want to bake those changes
in p-u first.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
if this would help:
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=9d2e9d66a3f032667934144cd61c396ba49f090d
Would you be able to test that?
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe
0B0A 2626 D49C BFC6 1C18 1619 74E4 C259 E0E8
`. `'` HP: http://debalance.funpic.de, Skype: philipp-huebner
`- ICQ: 235-524-440, Jabber: der_scha...@jabber.org
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble
, vhdr);
if (!bh)
--- END ---
Ben.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
kernel.org. If not, just report the issue upstream and
note your kernel version (and include lspci output as Ben suggested).
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
and then which sub category.
IO/Storage-Serial ATA I would guess.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Thu, Oct 01, 2009 at 07:48:21AM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
owner 515741 marc.ko...@mni.fh-giessen.de
Bug #515741 {Done: dann frazier da...@debian.org}
[linux-image-2.6.26-1-amd64] flock() error with ocfs2/dlm
Owner recorded
upstream kernel right? If the problem
is reproducible with upstream kernels, you really need to report it
there, and ideally with results/screen shots from 2.6.32-rc1 or
2.6.31.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble
it is an upstream problem I'd suggest trying
the latest upstream kernel and, if the problem still exists,
reporting a bug at:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas
hey,
Can you test this kernel and report back the results?
http://people.debian.org/~dannf/bugs/515741/
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 11:30:04AM -0700, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Mon, 2009-09-28 at 17:06 +0200, Jürgen Kertz wrote:
Hello!
Thank you all for explaining the matter to me!
I finally understand why there has to be this non-free firmware package.
Hopefully there will be a convenient
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 06:51:33PM +0200, jazz wrote:
I ran the test kernel for a day with no oops (fyi, it used to oops in
about 30 min. max).
Great, thanks for testing. This fix should be included in the next
stable release.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 02:18:54PM +0200, jazz wrote:
After a lot of issue i'm finally about to test your fix !
The build server still appears to be down ... correct ?
Correct. You can grab a build from here:
http://people.debian.org/~dannf/bugs/530636/
--
dann frazier
export svn://svn.debian.org/svn/kernel/releases/linux-2.6/2.6.18.dfsg.1-22
svn export
svn://svn.debian.org/svn/kernel/releases/linux-2.6/2.6.18.dfsg.1-22etch2
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
the 'dmesg' output from the Red Hat system?
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
report at all - perhaps you
could post such stream of consciousness comments to a personal blog?
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
).
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
(Note that the build server is offline at the moment)
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 02:42:15PM +0200, jazz wrote:
The issue is still present in the latest debian kernel release.
Can you be specific about the version? (hint: cat /proc/version)
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
it.
Consequently, if
you reboot into your newly installed 2.6.30 kernel, your networking, if
using an E10/100 card for instance, is irretrievably broken.
Irretrievably? Can't you reboot your old kernel and install
firmware-linux?
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 10:14:46PM +0200, J.M.Roth wrote:
Package: loop-aes-modules-2.6.26-2-686
Version: 2.6.26+3.2c-6+lenny1
This isn't a debian kernel version.
Can you reproduce with the lenny kernel?
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
. The machine
seems to boot
into 2.6.30 and then it hangs there. I cannot investigate any further,
becouse of the
remote access.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 05:59:29PM +0200, Jan Prunk wrote:
Thank you for your suggestion, this indeed fixes this bug report !
Great, closing.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas
my room which I'll be sharing w/ a coworker.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
101 - 200 of 1189 matches
Mail list logo
