for tomorrow or so.
Awesome.
Is there anything special we need to add to deal with etch 1/2
kernel metapackages? We were talking about using a name like
linux-image-2.6-686-etchnhalf.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
need to remove the hooks that call grub in
/etc/kernel-img.conf.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
.)
Because of mirror space issues _and_ because of required preparations on
the debian-cd side this _really_ needs to be discussed with Sledge
urgently.
I'll reply to this on debian-cd only
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble
if you run the following?
# modprobe snd-pcm-oss
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
by sharing files across multiple packages. You shouldn't need it when
building custom kernels with make-kpkg.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 01:41:54AM +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
On Wednesday 06 February 2008, dann frazier wrote:
hey Ritesh,
?This package is linux-2.6 specific, presumably to optimize for space
by sharing files across multiple packages. You shouldn't need it when
building custom
for etchnhalf will be netinst
cds. These cds will be limited to i386, amd64, and other archs for
which a need is demonstrated.
It sounds good to me - an additional benefit is that it reduces the
number of images we need to test.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
please help me with:
1. Is there a mirror somewhere that has these packages?
2. Have I missed something vitally important??
Thanking you.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: firmware-nonfree
Version: 0.4
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertag: SRM
Looks like this package should've been updated with each linux-2.6 ABI
bump - its still build-depending on linux-support-2.6.18-4.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
that's necessary, we should be able to add support in etch's 2.6.18.
--
dann frazier
commit 5881cde8a38cab3b228a63516ab64f8d79acc4f5
Author: Jesse Brandeburg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu Aug 31 14:27:47 2006 -0700
e1000: Add PCI ID 0x10a4 for our new 4-port PCI-Express device
Device
even filesystem corruption at least with ext2 filesystem.
Thanks for the report. There will be another update soon to fix this
issue.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 02:59:12PM +0100, Bruno Cornec wrote:
dann frazier said on Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 04:04:50PM -0700:
I backported a couple of changsets to 2.6.18 that add support for
these cards. I did some light testing on a low profile model, and it
seems to work fine.
Any
hey Klaus,
Does this package resolve the issue for you?
http://kernel.debian.net/debian/pool/main/kernel-image-2.4.27-i386/kernel-image-2.4.27-4-k6_2.4.27-10sarge7_i386.deb
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
/2008/02/msg00278.html
http://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/2008/02/msg00566.html
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 06:09:08PM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 05:06:18PM +0100, Vladislav Kurz wrote:
Hello all,
I wanted to file this through BTS but I'm not sure which package is the
right
place ot file kernel related bugs. Therefore I post here
' would be easier to read, or a portion of
/var/log/kernel.log - ideally from bootup to oops.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SELinux
system than the other way around - at least until there's an accepted
fix for this issue upstream.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Mar 07, 2008 at 07:13:20PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
On Fri, Mar 07, 2008 at 10:40:43AM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
This is wrt #463669. Enabling POSIX file capabilities breaks signaling
atd and therefore at job submittal, and there is no fix yet that has
been accepted upstream
://www.debian.org/releases/etch/i386/release-notes/ch-upgrading.en.html#s-kernel-metapackage
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
, other times 33:33:ff:81:16:3a is missing and neighbor
discovery breaks instead. There was a similar problem in bug #410375.
Can you test this image and see if it fixes the problem for you?
http://people.debian.org/~dannf/bugs/466719/
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
to generate and
install such a package on your own:
# aptitude install module-assistant unionfs-source
# m-a prepare -l 2.6.18-6-xen-amd64
# m-a a-i unionfs -l 2.6.18-6-xen-amd64
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
?
Is this something you see on every reboot?
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
fscking the filesystem if you haven't already.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
will need to provide more information to help us determine the
cause. See: http://wiki.debian.org/DebianKernelReportingBugs
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tag 463606 - moreinfo
thanks
oops - I see now that this was a follow-up, not a new bug, sorry about
that.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 2005-02-01 at 17:38 -0500, Kyle McMartin wrote:
On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 03:02:31PM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
Any debian-kernel folks gonna be at Debconf this year? Anyone planning
to talk? I was thinking about proposing one - maybe a general overview
talk?
I'm planning
On Tue, 2005-02-01 at 21:56 -0500, Andres Salomon wrote:
On Tue, 01 Feb 2005 15:02:31 -0700, dann frazier wrote:
Any debian-kernel folks gonna be at Debconf this year? Anyone planning
to talk? I was thinking about proposing one - maybe a general overview
talk?
I intend to attend; I
On Thu, 2005-02-10 at 00:24 +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
I am wondering what the purpose of the kernel-tree packages is.
Here's a snippet of a doc I wrote for work some time ago - hopefully
others will jump in if there are inaccuracies.
kernel-tree kernel-patch-debian
On Thu, 2005-02-10 at 02:35 +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
Thanks for the doc, Dann.
However, I think you will still agree with me that the control
description for kernel-tree packages is largely false and
misguiding. I propose the following instead:
Description: Linux kernel source tree
On Wed, Jun 02, 2004 at 12:14:58PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
linux-kernel-KVERS-ARCH(-SUBVERS) (plus extras, see below)
remov the -kernel, linux is the kernel, and upstream tarballs are
linux-$version, too.
remove the -arch, it'll be .$arch.deb anyway, rather add a -flavour.
This
On Wed, Jun 02, 2004 at 04:41:20PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Wed, Jun 02, 2004 at 07:52:15AM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
I believe its a greater maintenance mess to attempt to keep them united.
I can be more confident that upstream's ia64 arch patch will apply
reasonably
well
On Thu, Jun 03, 2004 at 12:26:52PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
a) less maintaince overhead for the security team
I don't think this is the case; but like you said, lets hear from them before
making this conclusion.
b) kernel-patch packages always work cross-plattform
define work :) By
On Sun, Aug 01, 2004 at 09:28:46PM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote:
Note that one thing I'm concerned about (and probably should've mentioned
in my original post) is ia64 and alpha; getting 2.6.8 into sarge will be
tight. Assume that i386 and powerpc will be thrown in w/ kernel-source,
as those
On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 09:53:04AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
mailine kernels build out of the box. The additional early printk
support in the ia64 patch has been replaced with something better in
mainline, leaving only a completly unrelated and unexplainable usb
change in david's patch
tags 262982 + woody
thanks.
I can reproduce this problem on a sid box w/ woody's 2.4.17 kernel.
I ran your test program on a 2.4.26/sid system, and on a woody system
with a 2.4.20 kernel, and neither machine exhibited this problem.
On Sat, Aug 14, 2004 at 09:10:28PM -0400, Archive Administrator wrote:
kernel-source-2.6.8_2.6.8-1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
kernel-source-2.6.8_2.6.8-1.dsc
kernel-source-2.6.8_2.6.8.orig.tar.gz
kernel-source-2.6.8_2.6.8-1.diff.gz
On Sun, Aug 15, 2004 at 07:58:51PM +0200, Frederik Schueler wrote:
Hi Dann,
On Sun, Aug 15, 2004 at 02:55:44AM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
The files I uploaded are available here:
http://people.debian.org/~dannf/kernel-source
the debian-patch package is missing there.
oops - its
Attached is a patch that updates the ia64-generic-no-smp patch in our
kernel source tree to the latest one jbarnes has posted to linux-ia64.
UP boots work for me with this updated patch.
hch: if you don't object, I'll add this to kernel-source today.
I've committed a couple fixes to kernel-source-2.6.8 that I'll need
to build the kernel images for ia64 - anyone object to me uploading
a 2.6.8-2 release?
- Forwarded message from Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
X-Original-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Processing of kernel-image-2.6.8-ia64_2.6.8-1_ia64.changes
From: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian)
On Sat, Aug 14, 2004 at 07:37:27PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
On Sat, Aug 14, 2004 at 12:28:59PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
On Fri, Aug 13, 2004 at 03:08:45PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
I think you're mistaken. The known bug in the DV scsi core was fixed
9 weeks ago (according to Linus
On Mon, Aug 23, 2004 at 12:01:32AM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
ARM's 2.4.26 kernel in the archive apparently doesn't work while
2.4.27 in NEW has been tested to work.
Another argument for 2.4.27 is that some arches have kernels that can
be taken as it for sarge (e.g. mips, arm); on the
On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 03:52:03PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
There will be a new d-i release before long anyway, which is also why we need
to take this decision, and make both debian-release and debian-boot
participate in it.
This argument goes away once 2.4.27 kernels are made available on
On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 09:49:36AM +0200, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
m68k here. There are 2.4.27 images available, they are just not yet in
sarge. We need at least 2.4.26-3 for atari in sarge, which still needs 3
days it seems. The 2.4.27 images need 6 days. Yes, I could have uploaded
them
On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 03:53:27PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
Well, it was the WE, alioth was done, and not many participated in the early
thread. tbm has pointed problem with some arches on 2.4.26 which are solved
with 2.4.27 though, so ...
Nobody seems to be arguing against 2.4.27 (well,
On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 03:55:39PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 04:20:41PM +0900, Horms wrote:
* kernel-latest-2.4-i386
- This is a NEW package that provides the meta packages that were
previously provided by kernel-image-2.4.26-i386 and are currently
On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 07:09:12PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
At least for fai, they would need to rebuild anyway, because we are going with
2.6.8. but this is nothing a rebuild cannot fix.
I'm sure that's true for all of them; its just a matter of being able
to tell the maintainer what to
On Fri, Aug 27, 2004 at 10:58:06PM +0200, Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
There was no final decision if we ship 2.4.27 with sarge.
I wonder what needs to happen to have a formal d-k decision.
Do other subgroups of Debian have a mechanism for this? Maybe we
need a designated person or persons who can
On Fri, Sep 10, 2004 at 11:38:36AM +0900, Horms wrote:
On Fri, Aug 06, 2004 at 02:05:55AM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
tags 262982 + woody
thanks.
I can reproduce this problem on a sid box w/ woody's 2.4.17 kernel.
I ran your test program on a 2.4.26/sid system, and on a woody system
callback for i965:
08da3f413f6aa3eb48cfc5331c68e57393167fe5
[AGPGART] intel_agp: PCI id update for Intel 965GM
4598af33d9143942f00cf7692b247027aba35316
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 10:51:17AM -0400, Stefan Monnier wrote:
I.e. it would require an explicit command on my part to install the newer
kernel.
Just put it on hold.
echo linux-image-2.6.20-1-686-bigmem hold | sudo dpkg --set-selections
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
hey Thijmen,
Is this issue resolved by the 2.6.18 kernel in etch?
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Version: 2.6.20-1
CVE-2007-1734 was fixed in 2.6.20.5 which was included in
2.6.20-1.
CVE-2007-1497 was fixed in 2.6.20.3, also included in 2.6.20-1.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
hey,
I don't see any reason to continue having initrd-tools in testing, so
can we get a freeze exception to enable its removal?
--
dann frazier | HP Open Source and Linux Organization
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
/debian-kernel etch main
This patch was committed in r8560, so you'll want to test a
version = 2.6.18.dfsg.1-13~snapshot.8560 when its available.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
here:
deb http://kernel-archive.buildserver.net/debian-kernel etch main
Please try a version = 2.6.18.dfsg.1-13~snapshot.8564 (should be
available within 24 hours).
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 11:04:07AM +0200, Joerg Dorchain wrote:
On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 07:32:57PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
You can retrieve snapshots from here:
deb http://kernel-archive.buildserver.net/debian-kernel etch main
This patch was committed in r8560, so you'll want
-kernel etch main
2) apt-get update
3) apt-get install build-essential
4) apt-get build-dep linux-2.6
5) apt-get source -b linux-2.6
I've copied some pre-built debs to here, if that's easier:
http://people.debian.org/~dannf/404148/
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
so that
we might reproduce.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and recommit when this is resolved.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 11:18:26AM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
I'll revert for now and recommit when this is resolved.
hey Gordon,
Vlad Yasevich sent me a fix for this, and I've committed it in
r8571. Would you mind testing this to confirm it fixes your problem?
--
dann frazier
, you can remove
the hooks lines from that file.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mapcount:0 count:8192
Trying to fix it up, but a reboot is needed
hey Rob,
This is most likely a sign of bad memory. You can try running one of
the memtest86 tools to verify, but I'd suggest replacing this DIMM.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
://incoming.debian.org/
It looks like alpha, mips, and mipsel have been stuck since the 19th,
and sparc since the 20th.
I believe the correct group of people to contact for this issue are
the FTP Masters, whom I've cc'd.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
these
updates (modules, fai-kernels, user-mode-linux, etc). What is the
correct procedure for timing those uploads to insure that the buildds
build against the correct source?
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
hey Subhashis,
Can you attempt to reproduce this bug with the 2.6.21 kernel in sid?
It would be good to know if this still exists in recent kernels before
forwarding this upstream. If you can reproduce, please include the
entire output of 'dmesg' in your follow-up.
--
dann frazier
Can you let us know if this problem is still reproducible with etch's
2.6.18 kernel?
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
need to update linux-latest-2.6
individually for those suites.
Does anyone object to updating linux-latest 2.6 for 2.6.21-1 in sid?
Other than the KERNELVERSION change, are there other things that need
to happen first (e.g., removal of transition packages, etc)?
--
dann frazier
for
2.6.21, or are there other things that should be fixed first?
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
an additional kernel flavor?
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
acpi_register_gsi() even for default PCI interrupt
assignment. That's the part that keeps track of the ELCR register, and we
want to make sure that the PCI interrupts are properly marked level/low.
[ dann frazier ]
* Merge in applicable fixes from 2.6.12.4
- netfilter-deadlock
, I'd suggest running etch and installing
etch's linux-image-2.6-k7, which will keep you running the latest
2.6.18 even if the ABI name changes.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
missing something? Should I post my whole sources.list file?
Feel free, but the above process should be sufficient for identifying
the problem.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 07:00:44PM -0700, Phillip Pi wrote:
deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ unstable main non-free contrib
There you go, unstable == sid.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
, get it down to where 80% of the work can be handled by
monkeys, then start baiting traps with bananas and building automated
poop-slingers where feasible.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/oldstable/base/kernel-image-2.6-k7 or any
apt mirror for verification.
Please be patient - these security updates are in progress.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
easily by running the above commands
followed by:
# apt-get install ndiswrapper-source
# m-a a-i ndiswrapper
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
suppose the ticket can be closed.
ok, closing then. thanks for the update.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
will be used.
Do you want to continue [Y/n]?
/etc/apt/sources.list:
deb http://security.debian.org/ sarge/updates main contrib non-free
deb-src http://security.debian.org/ sarge/updates main contrib non-free
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe
# tar xfj /usr/src/linux-source-2.6.18.tar.bz2
# cd linux-source-2.6.18
# /usr/src/kernel-patches/all/2.6.18/apply/debian -a hppa
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
modules for ivtv and nvidia in
the archive.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 03:03:33PM +0800, Shane Huang wrote:
If next Debian release(4.1?) will use the linux
kernel
after 2.6.23-rc1, then that's good and you may discard this mail.
It will.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe
for
sb700, but is there a good reason for adding it for sb600 as well?
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff_plain;h=ab17443a3df35abe4b7529e83511a591aa7384f3
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble
a good reason.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, Jul 08, 2007 at 05:50:11PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
Hi folks
I'd like to schedule 2.6.21-6 for tuesday. It only contains a security
fix.
Dann: Is there a CVE for the nf_conntrack_h323?
I have not seen one, but I'll ask on vendor-sec.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
On Mon, Jul 09, 2007 at 01:49:15PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
On Sun, Jul 08, 2007 at 05:50:11PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
Hi folks
I'd like to schedule 2.6.21-6 for tuesday. It only contains a security
fix.
Dann: Is there a CVE for the nf_conntrack_h323?
I have not seen one
for experimental (also in the list above), though I am
testing a build w/ vserver enabled since I've had a few different
requests for this now.
mips and mipsel where builds are needed.
don't have these, sorry :(
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe
On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 06:07:24PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 03:08:36PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
According to the projectb, only amd64, arm, i386, ia64 and powerpc had
linux-2.6/experimental built. s390 and sparc are built in the snapshots.
This left alpha
On Thu, Jul 12, 2007 at 08:06:03PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
On Thu, Jul 12, 2007 at 10:50:24AM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
[2]
CC [M] drivers/video/vgastate.o
In file included from drivers/video/vgastate.c:20:
include/video/vga.h:23:21: error: asm/vga.h: No such file or directory
On Thu, Jul 12, 2007 at 12:12:48PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
No good reason, I'll retry trunk builds of both alpha and hppa.
fyi, alpha fails at the same point. My hppa build is still progressing.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe
On Thu, Jul 12, 2007 at 11:13:23PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
On Thu, Jul 12, 2007 at 10:36:19PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
On Thu, Jul 12, 2007 at 01:57:57PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
On Thu, Jul 12, 2007 at 12:12:48PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
No good reason, I'll retry
.
Hardware itself is fine.
hey Victor,
Your best bet for getting this fixed is to help narrow down when the
change occurred as much as possible.
I just created this page that should help explain how to do that:
http://wiki.debian.org/DebianKernelReportingBugs
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
/DebianKernelReportingBugs
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
through
SCSI device sda: 71129088 512-byte hdwr sectors (36418 MB)
sda: Write Protect is off
sda: Mode Sense: 00 00 00 00
sda: asking for cache data failed
sda: assuming drive cache: write through
sda: sda1 sda2 sda5
sd 0:2:0:0: Attached scsi disk sda
...
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
wonder if your ahci problem is fixable in etch - do you happen to
know what changed to fix it?
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
boot.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/ --help to see the full list of
options.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
hey Mikko,
I've queued your patch up for the second etch point
release. Snapshots of this kernel are autobuilt and available for
testing. Would you mind testing the latest build to verify?
See:
http://wiki.debian.org/DebianKernel
The patch is in dists/etch/
--
dann frazier
consider backporting it
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Jul 24, 2007 at 05:21:02PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
Hi folks
2.6.22 is currently broken on ia64 and mipsel.
- ia64: ABI.
Testing a build now.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
301 - 400 of 1189 matches
Mail list logo
