Re: What to do with d-i on armel?

2024-03-03 Thread Christoph Biedl
Emanuele Rocca wrote...

> Any armel users out there? :-)

Fairly late, but just to avoid the impression there aren't any left:
Yes, here.

But that's not an objection against plans in Debian kernel and/or d-i,
I'm using my own kernel, and should I ever have the need of a new
installation, I know how to debootstrap and the rest.

Besides, the hardware is a Seagate DockStar, so

Architecture:   armv5tel
  Byte Order:   Little Endian
CPU(s): 1
  On-line CPU(s) list:  0
Vendor ID:  Marvell
  Model name:   Feroceon-88FR131

and 128 Mbytes of RAM. Running Debian stable already requires some hacks
to not end up in thrashing, I might do a presentation "Running Debian on
small systems" some day about it.

In summary, I'm glad Debian keeps supporting this device - but I'm
aware the good times are in the past and it will very likely become
e-waste before the hardware dies. If not Debian ends the support, the
Linux kernel will.

Christoph


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Bug#1017425: 5.10.0-17-686-pae: repeatedly crashes during initrd loading [PIII]

2022-08-27 Thread Christoph Biedl
Ben Hutchings wrote...

> As a temporary workaround, disabling the Spectre v2 mitigation with the
> kernel parameter "nospectre_v2" should allow this kernel version to run
> on older CPUs without SSE2.  We'll fix this properly in a later update.

Thank you, that did the right thing on my very old Celeron (Coppermine) CPU
from around the year 2000, part of my hardware museum.

Christoph


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Bug#886049: Further splice() tests with and without libglib2.0-0

2019-02-13 Thread Christoph Biedl
Reiny wrote...

> About the above mentioned bug I did some more tests: I built a debug version
> of the libglib2.0-0 to see what is happening inside where the splice
> function is called. In case of a small file with 112 bytes the splice() is
> called inside the function do_splice() in gfile.c for three times:
(...)

At first, thanks a lot for your analysis.

Now my question, does this still happen in buster or sid? Since I could not
reproduce the problem in buster, but very well in Ubuntu Bionic, I assume
it has been healed the the past weeks, possibly by the latest glib2 upstream
release - although I didn't find anything obvious in the sources.

Christoph


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Bug#829280: initramfs-tools: "cannot stat '/etc/modprobe.d/*'" warning from empty /etc/modprobe.d/

2016-07-02 Thread Christoph Biedl
Michael Prokop wrote...

> Right (while kmod ignores the non *.conf files - so no harm done -
> it might still be confusing for the user).
(...)
> http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/kernel/initramfs-tools.git/commit/?h=mika/829280)
> and let us know whether this works for you?

Looks good. Thanks for your swift reaction.

Christoph


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#829280: initramfs-tools: "cannot stat '/etc/modprobe.d/*'" warning from empty /etc/modprobe.d/

2016-07-01 Thread Christoph Biedl
Source: initramfs-tools
Version: Warning upon empty /etc/modprobe.d/
Severity: minor

Dear Maintainer,

when /etc/modprobe.d/ exists but is empty, update-initramfs issues
a warning:

| # update-initramfs  -k all -u
| update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-4.6.0-1-amd64
| cp: cannot stat '/etc/modprobe.d/*': No such file or directory

Besides cosmetical issues I wonder what happens if there are files that
just are a reminder of dpkg conffile handling, like e.g.

/etc/modprobe.d/pptpd.conf.dpkg-remove

since appearently update-initramfs happily processes them. Which is
probably not the right thing to do.

Christoph

-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 4.4.13 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: unable to detect



signature.asc
Description: Digital signature