Bug#1031839: network devices do not work after kernel upgrade
On 2/28/23 18:58, Thorsten Alteholz wrote: > which one would you recommend? we use those extensively (several thousands), ymmv: https://www.flexoptix.net/de/p-8596-02.html Regards, Daniel
Bug#1031839: network devices do not work after kernel upgrade
On 2/27/23 15:25, Daniel Baumann wrote: > ixgbe.allow_unsupported_sfp=1 I've rebootet the server again just to check and indeed, the above override doesn't work anymore (also tried with ...=1,1 because it's a two slots adapter, but doesn't make any difference). So, seems the reason for your trouble is that allow_unsupported_sfp broke somewhen in between 5.x and 6.x, at least for ixgbe. I didn't check with i40e, but could do so if needed/wanted. Any chance you could confirm it by testing with an Intel-branded SFP? Regards, Daniel
Bug#1031839: network devices do not work after kernel upgrade
Hi Thorsten, On 2/25/23 11:56, Thorsten Alteholz wrote: > The I225-V are working fine, the other four make trouble. right, but those are copper interfaces. > I am using transceiver modules AXS85-192-M3 from 10Gtek. It looks like they are not flashable (like flexoptix and others), so I presume these are "non-Intel"-branded. > The allow_unsupported_sfp=1 does not make a difference. Shouldn't there > be at least a syslog message if an unsupported sfp is detected? Just to be extra sure, you've added: ixgbe.allow_unsupported_sfp=1 to your kernel cmdline, right? I've checked with an up2date bookworm test-server and kernel 6.1.12-1.. when inserting a Intel-branded flexoptix SFP, I'll get this message: Feb 27 14:59:06 xxx kernel: ixgbe :5e:00.0 ens2f0: detected SFP+: 5 whereas with a Arista-branded one, I'll get the same: Feb 27 15:00:30 xxx kernel: ixgbe :5e:00.0 ens2f0: detected SFP+: 5 Just to document it.. this is dmesg from after rebooting the machine, there's no allow_unsupported_sfp set at all, and there's an Intel-branded SFP in one slot (ens2f0), an Arista-branded one in the other (ens2f1): [3.178235] ixgbe: Intel(R) 10 Gigabit PCI Express Network Driver [3.178385] ixgbe: Copyright (c) 1999-2016 Intel Corporation. [3.927189] ixgbe :5e:00.0: Multiqueue Enabled: Rx Queue count = 63, Tx Queue count = 63 XDP Queue count = 0 [3.927726] ixgbe :5e:00.0: 32.000 Gb/s available PCIe bandwidth (5.0 GT/s PCIe x8 link) [3.928058] ixgbe :5e:00.0: MAC: 2, PHY: 19, SFP+: 5, PBA No: 0210FF-0FF [3.928320] ixgbe :5e:00.0: 0c:c4:7a:8f:48:f6 [3.940393] ixgbe :5e:00.0: Intel(R) 10 Gigabit Network Connection [4.121469] ixgbe :5e:00.1: Multiqueue Enabled: Rx Queue count = 63, Tx Queue count = 63 XDP Queue count = 0 [4.122320] ixgbe :5e:00.1: 32.000 Gb/s available PCIe bandwidth (5.0 GT/s PCIe x8 link) [4.122938] ixgbe :5e:00.1: MAC: 2, PHY: 20, SFP+: 6, PBA No: 0210FF-0FF [4.123483] ixgbe :5e:00.1: 0c:c4:7a:8f:48:f7 [4.134330] ixgbe :5e:00.1: Intel(R) 10 Gigabit Network Connection [4.315894] ixgbe :5e:00.0 ens2f0: renamed from eth2 [4.411504] ixgbe :5e:00.1 ens2f1: renamed from eth3 [8.043579] ixgbe :5e:00.0: registered PHC device on ens2f0 [8.227099] ixgbe :5e:00.0 ens2f0: detected SFP+: 5 it's not obvious from the messages that one SFP is working and the other one is not. the only difference I can see is that the one with the Intel-branded SFP has this line: [8.043579] ixgbe :5e:00.0: registered PHC device on ens2f0 there's also no difference wrt/ the debug level (I've testet with printk set to 7 and 8, no additional messages are shown). Hope that helps - my guess would be to try and verify with an Intel or Intel-flashed SFP to rule out. Hope that helps. Regards, Daniel
Bug#1031839: network devices do not work after kernel upgrade
On 2/25/23 00:43, Thorsten Alteholz wrote: > The problem is related to the 10GB interfaces that are handled by module > ixgbe. They are called eno*. jftr, that depends on the board/card configuration (in the majority of our supermicro servers, the ixgbe are usually enp175* and ens2*) > The first log shows the not working kernel 6.x and the second part shows > the working kernel 5.x. "ip a" shows in the first case "no-carrier" and > all LEDs of that interface remain off. what specific nic or mainboard do you have (onboard or discrete nic)? do you use the correct branded sfps, did you try "allow_unsupported_sfp=1" already? Regards, Daniel
Bug#1031839: network devices do not work after kernel upgrade
Hi Thorsten, On 2/24/23 00:28, Thorsten Alteholz wrote: > The devices are recognized and can be configured but "ip a" shows > "no-carrier" for them. I can't reproduce it, the nics works for fine for me with both 6.1.8 and 6.1.12. Can you rule out that you were hit by the "interface names changed"-problem (here, enp* changed to ens*)? Between 5.x and 6.x this cought us a couple of times by surprise too.. Regards, Daniel
Bug#1004495: 5.16.3-1~exp1 FTBFS on i386
Package: linux Version: 5.16.3-1~exp1 Severity: serious Tag: experimental Hi, unfortunately the last upload to experimental failed to build on i386. Regards, Daniel
Bug#993885: upgrade failures
Package: nfs-utils Version: 1:2.5.4-1~exp2 Severity: serious Hi Anibal thanks for the previous upload, however, the upgrade of nfs-common from sid to experimental still fails: ---snip--- [...] Get:2 http://debian.ethz.ch/debian experimental/main amd64 libnfsidmap1 amd64 1:2.5.4-1~exp2 [78.4 kB] Get:3 http://debian.ethz.ch/debian sid/main amd64 libevent-core-2.1-7 amd64 2.1.12-stable-1 [139 kB] Fetched 523 kB in 0s (3464 kB/s) (Reading database ... 21068 files and directories currently installed.) Preparing to unpack .../nfs-common_1%3a2.5.4-1~exp2_amd64.deb ... Unpacking nfs-common (1:2.5.4-1~exp2) over (1:1.3.4-6) ... dpkg: error processing archive /var/cache/apt/archives/nfs-common_1%3a2.5.4-1~exp2_amd64.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite '/usr/share/man/man5/idmapd.conf.5.gz', which is also in package libnfsidmap2:amd64 0.25-6 Running in chroot, ignoring request. All runlevel operations denied by policy invoke-rc.d: policy-rc.d denied execution of restart. Errors were encountered while processing: /var/cache/apt/archives/nfs-common_1%3a2.5.4-1~exp2_amd64.deb E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) ---snap--- Regards, Daniel
Bug#993789: Fails to install (idmapd.conf.5.gz also in libnfsidmap2)
Package: nfs-utils Severity: serious Version: 1:2.5.4-1~exp1 Tags: experimental Hi Anibal, after building the package, it fails to install: ---snip--- unpacking nfs-common (1:2.5.4-1~exp1) over (1:1.3.4-6) ... dpkg: error processing archive /var/cache/apt/archives/nfs-common_1%3a2.5.4-1~exp1_amd64.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite '/usr/share/man/man5/idmapd.conf.5.gz', which is also in package libnfsidmap2:amd64 0.25-6 nfs-utils.service is a disabled or a static unit not running, not starting it. Errors were encountered while processing: /var/cache/apt/archives/nfs-common_1%3a2.5.4-1~exp1_amd64.deb E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) ---snap--- Regards, Daniel
Bug#993785: FTBFS on most architectures
Package: nfs-utils Severity: serious Version: 1:2.5.4-1~exp1 Hi Anibal, thank so much for uploading a new nfs-utils version, much appreciated. unfortunately it fails to build on most architectures, I can confirm that re-adding the dropped multiarch-patch fixes it (re-diffed patch applied). Regards, DanielAuthor: Luk Claes Description: Support multiarch kerberos paths (Closes: #642797). diff -Naurp nfs-utils.orig/aclocal/kerberos5.m4 nfs-utils/aclocal/kerberos5.m4 --- nfs-utils.orig/aclocal/kerberos5.m4 +++ nfs-utils/aclocal/kerberos5.m4 @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ AC_DEFUN([AC_KERBEROS_V5],[ elif test -f "/usr/lib/mit/bin/krb5-config"; then K5CONFIG="/usr/lib/mit/bin/krb5-config" fi +MULTIARCH=`dpkg-architecture -qDEB_HOST_MULTIARCH 2>/dev/null || true` if test "$K5CONFIG" != ""; then KRBCFLAGS=`$K5CONFIG --cflags` KRBLIBS=`$K5CONFIG --libs` @@ -43,6 +44,7 @@ AC_DEFUN([AC_KERBEROS_V5],[ -f $dir/lib32/libgssapi_krb5.so -o \ -f $dir/lib64/libgssapi_krb5.a -o \ -f $dir/lib64/libgssapi_krb5.so -o \ + -f $dir/lib/$MULTIARCH/libgssapi_krb5.so -o \ -f $dir/lib/$(uname -m)-linux-gnu/libgssapi_krb5.a -o \ -f $dir/lib/$(uname -m)-linux-gnu/libgssapi_krb5.so \) ; then AC_DEFINE(HAVE_KRB5, 1, [Define this if you have MIT Kerberos libraries])
Bug#993707: FTBFS on arm64
Package: linux Version: 5.14-1~exp1 Severity: serious Hi, after applying the perf fixes, it builds for me on amd64, i386, armel, and armhf, but fails on arm64: ---snip--- dh_prep kernel-wedge install-files 5.14.0-trunk install -D -m 644 debian/linux-image-5.14.0-trunk-arm64/boot/vmlinuz-5.14.0-trunk-arm64 debian/kernel-image-5.14.0-trunk-arm64-di/boot/vmlinuz install -d debian/kernel-image-5.14.0-trunk-arm64-di/lib/modules/5.14.0-trunk-arm64 install -m 644 debian/linux-image-5.14.0-trunk-arm64/lib/modules/5.14.0-trunk-arm64/modules.builtin debian/linux-image-5.14.0-trunk-arm64/lib/modules/5.14.0-trunk-arm64/modules.order debian/kernel-image-5.14.0-trunk-arm64-di/lib/modules/5.14.0-trunk-arm64/ install -D -m 644 debian/linux-image-5.14.0-trunk-arm64/boot/System.map-5.14.0-trunk-arm64 debian/kernel-image-5.14.0-trunk-arm64-di/boot/System.map install -d debian/kernel-image-5.14.0-trunk-arm64-di/usr/lib cp -a debian/linux-image-5.14.0-trunk-arm64/usr/lib/linux-image-5.14.0-trunk-arm64 debian/kernel-image-5.14.0-trunk-arm64-di/usr/lib/linux-image-5.14.0-trunk-arm64 kernel-wedge copy-moduleven after applying the perf fixes, es 5.14.0-trunk arm64 5.14.0-trunk-arm64 kernel-wedge find-dups 5.14.0-trunk-arm64 debian/nic-usb-modules-5.14.0-trunk-arm64-di lib/modules/5.14.0-trunk-arm64/kernel/net/core/selftests.ko debian/nic-modules-5.14.0-trunk-arm64-di lib/modules/5.14.0-trunk-arm64/kernel/net/core/selftests.ko some modules are in more than one package command exited with status 1 make[2]: *** [debian/rules.real:570: install-udeb_arm64] Error 2 make[2]: Leaving directory '/build/linux-5.14-1~exp1' make[1]: *** [debian/rules.gen:35: binary-arch_arm64] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory '/build/linux-5.14-1~exp1' make: *** [debian/rules:43: binary-arch] Error 2 dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules binary-arch subprocess returned exit status 2 ---snap--- Regards, Daniel
Bug#993560: closed by Bastian Blank (Re: Bug#993560: FTBFS on arch-any)
reopen 993560 thanks On 9/3/21 16:24, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: Yes, we know. Great, thanks and looking forward to the upload that will fixes it. Regards, Daniel
Bug#993560: FTBFS on arch-any
Package: linux Version: 5.14-1~exp1 Severity: serious Hi, unfortunately the 5.14-1~exp1 upload failed to build on all architectures (except for 'all'). Regards, Daniel ---snip--- make[5]: Leaving directory '/<>/tools/perf' make[4]: Leaving directory '/<>/tools/perf' rm -f /<>/debian/linux-perf-5.14/usr/bin/trace_5.14 mkdir -p /<>/debian/linux-perf-5.14/usr/share/bash-completion/ mv /<>/debian/linux-perf-5.14/etc/bash_completion.d \ /<>/debian/linux-perf-5.14/usr/share/bash-completion/completions rmdir --ignore-fail-on-non-empty /<>/debian/linux-perf-5.14/etc cd /<>/debian/linux-perf-5.14 && ! find \! -type d \! -path '*[_-]5.14*' | grep . ./usr/include/perf/perf_dlfilter.h make[3]: *** [/<>/debian/rules.d/tools/perf/Makefile:57: install] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory '/<>/debian/build/build-tools/tools/perf' make[2]: *** [debian/rules.real:730: install-perf] Error 2 make[2]: Leaving directory '/<>' make[1]: *** [debian/rules.gen:34: binary-arch_amd64_real] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory '/<>' make: *** [debian/rules:43: binary-arch] Error 2 dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules binary-arch subprocess returned exit status 2 ---snap---
Bug#992221: 5.13 FTBFS on armel (kernel-wedge find-dups)
Package: linux Version: 5.13.9-1~exp2 Hi, on armel the package FTBFs'es when running kernel-wedge find-dups: ---snip--- kernel-wedge install-files 5.13.0-trunk install -D -m 644 debian/linux-image-5.13.0-trunk-marvell/boot/vmlinuz-5.13.0-trunk-marvell debian/kernel-image-5.13.0-trunk-marvell-di/boot/vmlinuz-5.13.0-trunk-marvell install -d debian/kernel-image-5.13.0-trunk-marvell-di/lib/modules/5.13.0-trunk-marvell install -m 644 debian/linux-image-5.13.0-trunk-marvell/lib/modules/5.13.0-trunk-marvell/modules.builtin debian/linux-image-5.13.0-trunk-marvell/lib/modules/5.13.0-trunk-marvell/modules.order debian/kernel-image-5.13.0-trunk-marvell-di/lib/modules/5.13.0-trunk-marvell/ install -D -m 644 debian/linux-image-5.13.0-trunk-marvell/boot/System.map-5.13.0-trunk-marvell debian/kernel-image-5.13.0-trunk-marvell-di/boot/System.map-5.13.0-trunk-marvell install -d debian/kernel-image-5.13.0-trunk-marvell-di/usr/lib cp -a debian/linux-image-5.13.0-trunk-marvell/usr/lib/linux-image-5.13.0-trunk-marvell debian/kernel-image-5.13.0-trunk-marvell-di/usr/lib/linux-image-5.13.0-trunk-marvell kernel-wedge copy-modules 5.13.0-trunk marvell 5.13.0-trunk-marvell kernel-wedge find-dups 5.13.0-trunk-marvell some modules are in more than one package debian/squashfs-modules-5.13.0-trunk-marvell-di lib/modules/5.13.0-trunk-marvell/kernel/lib/lz4/lz4_decompress.ko debian/f2fs-modules-5.13.0-trunk-marvell-di lib/modules/5.13.0-trunk-marvell/kernel/lib/lz4/lz4_decompress.ko command exited with status 1 make[2]: *** [debian/rules.real:573: install-udeb_armel] Error 2 make[2]: Leaving directory '/<>' make[1]: *** [debian/rules.gen:57: binary-arch_armel] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory '/<>' make: *** [debian/rules:43: binary-arch] Error 2 dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules binary-arch subprocess returned exit status 2 ---snap--- Regards, Daniel
Bug#992220: linux-kbuild-5.13 misses modules-check.sh
Package: linux Version: 5.13.9-1~exp2 Hi, linux-kbuild-5.13 is missing scripts/modules-check.sh which is needed to build some dkms modules (e.g. virtualbox). Regards, Daniel
Bug#931930: firmware-misc-nonfree: Please, include i915/icl_dmc_ver1_07.bin
Hi, I'm getting these messages too.. the files are included in the upstream repo, also there's a new upstream tag too (20190815). It would be nice if this could get uploaded to unstable. Regards, Daniel
Bug#902936: fixed in zutils 1.7-2
On 07/28/2018 11:05 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote: >>* Skipping zcat for now (Closes: #902936, #903931). > [...] > > But you didn't actually do that. when installing zutils 1.7-2, /bin/zcat remains untouched. can you please elaborate why you think i "didn't actually do that"? > And now you've reassigned this back to initramfs-tools with no > explanation. did you see https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=903931#47 and following? Regards, Daniel
Bug#872414: FTBFS with linux-libc-dev << 4.11 >= 4.12
Package: linux Version: 4.12.16-1 Hi, linux FTBFS if linux-libc-dev << 4.11 is installed, but it also fails to rebuild if linux-libc-dev from unstable is installed. Failure with << 4.11 is like this: /build/linux-4.12.6-1/tools/power/x86/turbostat/turbostat.c: In function ‘decode_misc_feature_control’: /build/linux-4.12.6-1/tools/power/x86/turbostat/turbostat.c:3915:25: error: ‘MSR_MISC_FEATURE_CONTROL’ undeclared (first use in this) if (!get_msr(base_cpu, MSR_MISC_FEATURE_CONTROL, )) ^~~~ [...] Failure with >= 4.12 is that it doesn't find asm/msr-index.h. Regards, Daniel
Bug#796005: 4.1.5-1 FTBFS on i386
Package: linux Version: 4.1.5-1 Severity: serious Hi, the last upload failed to build on i386 as gpio_keys_polled and leds-gpi have not yet properly enabled but already reference in the d-i include file. Regards, Daniel -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Donnerbuehlweg 3, CH-3012 Bern Email: daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net Internet: http://people.progress-technologies.net/~daniel.baumann/
Bug#787004: FTBFS on amd64
Package: linux Version: 4.0.4-1 Severity: serious Hi, your last upload fails to build on amd64, see buildlog: ---snip--- [...] install -d debian/kernel-image-4.0.0-2-amd64-di/lib/modules/4.0.0-2-amd64 install -m 644 debian/linux-image-4.0.0-2-amd64/lib/modules/4.0.0-2-amd64/modules.builtin debian/linux-image-4.0.0-2-amd64/lib/modules/4.0.0-2-amd64/modules.order debian/kernel-image-4.0.0-2-amd64-di/lib/modules/4.0.0-2-amd64/ install -D -m 644 debian/linux-image-4.0.0-2-amd64/boot/System.map-4.0.0-2-amd64 debian/kernel-image-4.0.0-2-amd64-di/boot/System.map kernel-wedge copy-modules 4.0.0-2 amd64 4.0.0-2-amd64 missing module i2o_block missing module i2o_scsi command exited with status 1 make[2]: *** [install-udeb_amd64] Error 2 debian/rules.real:424: recipe for target 'install-udeb_amd64' failed make[2]: Leaving directory '/«PKGBUILDDIR»' make[1]: *** [binary-arch_amd64] Error 2 debian/rules.gen:19: recipe for target 'binary-arch_amd64' failed make[1]: Leaving directory '/«PKGBUILDDIR»' make: *** [binary-arch] Error 2 debian/rules:42: recipe for target 'binary-arch' failed ---snap--- Regards, Daniel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/5565fc9a.20...@progress-technologies.net
Re: Replacing aufs with overlayfs
On 12/09/14 20:55, Ben Hutchings wrote: I am assuming that this will cover the needs of Debian live systems, so I've dropped aufs from the Debian packaging. yes. you can expect this change to appear in unstable shortly after the jessie release. great, looking forward to that. -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Donnerbuehlweg 3, CH-3012 Bern Email: daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net Internet: http://people.progress-technologies.net/~daniel.baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/54875d4a.6020...@progress-technologies.net
Bug#730614: Please enable CONFIG_CHECKPOINT_RESTORE for criu.
Package: linux Version: 3.12-1~exp1 Please enable CONFIG_CHECKPOINT_RESTORE for criu. -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Donnerbuehlweg 3, CH-3012 Bern Email: daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net Internet: http://people.progress-technologies.net/~daniel.baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5295be13.5060...@progress-technologies.net
Bug#696244: console freezes when switching back to tty7 after X started and plymouth was used
On 06/06/2013 08:21 AM, Marc Haber wrote: Is this really a kernel issue? yes; if you want to rule it out, start plymouth with the text theme and 'nomodeset'. -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Donnerbuehlweg 3, CH-3012 Bern Email: daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net Internet: http://people.progress-technologies.net/~daniel.baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/51b02bb4.1020...@progress-technologies.net
Bug#708144: lxc-attach does not work
# duplicate of 595920 reassign 708144 linux close 708144 3.8-1~experimental.1 thanks -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Donnerbuehlweg 3, CH-3012 Bern Email: daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net Internet: http://people.progress-technologies.net/~daniel.baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/51911760.5090...@progress-technologies.net
Re: linux-image-rt AUFS support
On 02/17/2013 10:19 PM, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: Still more as (AFAIK) there are no plans to offer an offical rt live image. well, unsurprisingly.. if you don't ask/say something (on -live@) then nobody tells/does something about it. if it is considered useful, it's no big deal including rt kernel flavour on the images as well. -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Donnerbuehlweg 3, CH-3012 Bern Email: daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net Internet: http://people.progress-technologies.net/~daniel.baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5121e334.3030...@progress-technologies.net
Bug#699063: needs versioned build-depends against linux-libc-dev = 3.7
Package: linux-tools Version: 3.7.1-1~experimental.1 package FTFBS with older linux-libc-dev, please bumb build-depends accordingly. -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Donnerbuehlweg 3, CH-3012 Bern Email: daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net Internet: http://people.progress-technologies.net/~daniel.baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/51045ca6.9000...@progress-technologies.net
Bug#688222: needs update for 3.2.29-4
reopen 688222 retitle 688222 needs update for 3.2.30-1 thanks obviously, you should upload linux-latest for kernel-abi 3.2.0-4. -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Donnerbuehlweg 3, CH-3012 Bern Email: daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net Internet: http://people.progress-technologies.net/~daniel.baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/506aef05.1060...@progress-technologies.net
Bug#688222: needs update for 3.2.29-4
Package: linux-latest Severity: serious needs update for abi 4 of 3.2.29. -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Donnerbuehlweg 3, CH-3012 Bern Email: daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net Internet: http://people.progress-technologies.net/~daniel.baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/505b22c2.2070...@progress-technologies.net
Bug#684750: please add support for /etc/initramfs-tools/modules
Package: initramfs-tools Severity: wishlist now that we finally have a mechanism to load system modules with kmod by including snippets from other packages (or the sysadmin), the same would be nice to be able to do for modules during initramfs stage. therefore, please support something like /etc/initamfs-tools/modules.d in initramfs-tools. Regards, Daniel -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Donnerbuehlweg 3, CH-3012 Bern Email: daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net Internet: http://people.progress-technologies.net/~daniel.baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/50291027.4070...@progress-technologies.net
Bug#682504: Processed: Re: Bug#682504: Kernel panic booting live iso hybrid image as USB: quirk_usb_early_handoff
reassign 682504 initramfs-tools thanks On 07/23/2012 02:17 PM, Ben Armstrong wrote: Thanks, Ben. I'm rebuilding my image against live-boot live-config git HEAD to see if the issue is solved in git, and will try to capture earlier messages from the bad image to see if I can determine what killed init. why would that be a bug in live-*? live-* comes after the init from initramfs-tools, if init crashes, then that's a bug in initramfs-tools. -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Donnerbuehlweg 3, CH-3012 Bern Email: daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net Internet: http://people.progress-technologies.net/~daniel.baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/500d41e5.5000...@progress-technologies.net
Re: Bug#676921: ITP: amd64-microcode -- Processor microcode firmware for AMD CPUs
sounds all very reasonable to me, thanks Henrique. -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Donnerbuehlweg 3, CH-3012 Bern Email: daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net Internet: http://people.progress-technologies.net/~daniel.baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4fdcd513.6010...@progress-technologies.net
Re: Bug#676921: ITP: amd64-microcode -- Processor microcode firmware for AMD CPUs
On 06/12/2012 01:34 PM, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: However, amd64-microcode has a different upstream iirc so do the different firmware parts that src:firmware-nonfree builds. and it would already have to generate a separate binary package anyway for license reasons, iirc so are the other binary packages that get build from src:firmware-nonfree. so what is the point of adding it to firmware-nonfree? it would be nice to have everything in one place (= one src package), than to have things split over several, make the firmware stuff be updated all at once, and better integrated (by using '^-firmware' prefix). sure, most of them you could do without merging it on the source package level, but why make things more complicated than they have to be. We could make firmware-nonfree recommend intel-microcode | amd64-microcode on [i386, amd64], though. That sounds like a good idea to help people install the microcode updates. ack. After all, just about every new Intel and AMD processor has microcode patches issued, and both people and vendors are still as bad as they have always been at keeping their BIOS/EFI up-to-date... yep. -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Donnerbuehlweg 3, CH-3012 Bern Email: daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net Internet: http://people.progress-technologies.net/~daniel.baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4fd72ba1.4000...@progress-technologies.net
Bug#677253: please make firmware package versioned for co-installability
Package: firmware-nonfree Severity: wishlist most firmware works with a certain range of kernel versions. if that range is not big enough to include stable and testing, then, once one is using backports, one can no longer reasonably use the older kernel. practical example: on a squeeze system that needs bnx2 firmware, once you installed the backported kernel and firmware, the system will not have network anymore with the squeeze kernel (albeit both kernel packages can be properly co-installed). therefore, please make the firmware packages versioned (firmware-bnx2-3.2 or so). -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Donnerbuehlweg 3, CH-3012 Bern Email: daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net Internet: http://people.progress-technologies.net/~daniel.baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4fd76b1e.2040...@progress-technologies.net
Re: Bug#676921: ITP: amd64-microcode -- Processor microcode firmware for AMD CPUs
On 06/12/2012 06:04 PM, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: I don't care as long as nobody is going to get in the way of an urgency=high upload of firmware-nonfree to stable-proposed-updates or stable-updates. there have been updates of firmware-* packages in the past and more recently for squeeze too, so i don't think that's a problem. Well, the amd64-microcode has not cleared NEW yet. How should we proceed? in my personal opinion, i'd prefere having it integrated into firmware-nonfree. but it's not my call but the kernel team to decide. -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Donnerbuehlweg 3, CH-3012 Bern Email: daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net Internet: http://people.progress-technologies.net/~daniel.baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4fd76bf5.9010...@progress-technologies.net
Re: Bug#676921: ITP: amd64-microcode -- Processor microcode firmware for AMD CPUs
On 06/10/2012 04:31 PM, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: The microcode data file for Linux contains the latest microcode definitions for all AMD AMD64 processors. i'm aware that there's the intel-microcode package, however, why not integrate this into firmware-nonfree (as firmware-amd-microcode or something) and keep all this stuff at one place? -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Donnerbuehlweg 3, CH-3012 Bern Email: daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net Internet: http://people.progress-technologies.net/~daniel.baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4fd56d75.8060...@progress-technologies.net
Re: Please include AUFS nfs export support (CONFIG_AUFS_EXPORT) into standard kernel config
On 05/01/2012 01:43 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote: OK, will do. thanks. -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Donnerbuehlweg 3, CH-3012 Bern Email: daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net Internet: http://people.progress-technologies.net/~daniel.baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4fa0e772.60...@progress-technologies.net
Re: Please include AUFS nfs export support (CONFIG_AUFS_EXPORT) into standard kernel config
On 04/30/2012 02:28 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote: AUFS is included for use in Debian Live, only. We do not support any other usage, and it will be replaced with whichever union implementation is eventually included in mainline Linux. please enable it, live-boot will use it too in the nfs use case with the next upload. -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Donnerbuehlweg 3, CH-3012 Bern Email: daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net Internet: http://people.progress-technologies.net/~daniel.baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f9ea30b.4010...@progress-technologies.net
Bug#657078: The new NFS idmapper
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01/25/2012 03:24 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote: When do you intend to upload that to Debian? like i implied, already done yesterday. ;) - -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Donnerbuehlweg 3, CH-3012 Bern Email: daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net Internet: http://people.progress-technologies.net/~daniel.baumann/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk8fy5sACgkQ+C5cwEsrK55WlACfbTIa2VX8y5yINgLvGhx4sL2C hkcAoK24wtdqRlPn7AF4JxxlfA+opWz0 =WAX2 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f1fcb9b.4020...@progress-technologies.net
Bug#657078: The new NFS idmapper
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01/24/2012 04:24 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote: 1. keyutils supports a configuration directory (/etc/request-key.d) done with = 1.5.5-1. - -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Donnerbuehlweg 3, CH-3012 Bern Email: daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net Internet: http://people.progress-technologies.net/~daniel.baumann/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk8fQw4ACgkQ+C5cwEsrK55pIQCdG81sf6OddJvf+glIiuSBQ7rJ FnwAoJ9JGI4g+PAJKdPTRj+iEmgMdH8j =gh2s -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f1f430e.8050...@progress-technologies.net
Bug#655709: please enable CONFIG_BLK_DEV_THROTTLING
Package: linux-2.6 Version: 3.1.8-2 Severity: wishlist Please set CONFIG_BLK_DEV_THROTTLING=y in order to allow usage of throttling in block layer (use case is lxc). -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Donnerbuehlweg 3, CH-3012 Bern Email: daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net Internet: http://people.progress-technologies.net/~daniel.baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f1024dd.8080...@progress-technologies.net
Bug#595920: lxc-attach does not work
reopen 595920 thanks not enough. http://lxc.sourceforge.net/patches/linux/3.0.0/3.0.0-lxc1/patches/0016-ns-proc-Enable-setns-for-support-for-the-pid-namespa.patch -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Donnerbuehlweg 3, CH-3012 Bern Email: daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net Internet: http://people.progress-technologies.net/~daniel.baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4eaa646c.9010...@progress-technologies.net
Bug#644687: update to 3.0 aufs tree
Package: linux-2.6 Version: 3.0.0-5 please update aufs patches to aufs for linux 3.0 aka aufs3, rather than using the pre3 patches. -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Donnerbuehlweg 3, CH-3012 Bern Email: daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net Internet: http://people.progress-technologies.net/~daniel.baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e901aee.2020...@progress-technologies.net
Re: The trigger in your Debian packages
On 06/03/2011 10:24 AM, Raphael Hertzog wrote: 2/ If your package uses the activate directive, is it important that your package be considered as not configured (and thus not satisfying dependencies) until the trigger has been processed? i don't use any of the triggers but the one for update-initramfs and for that, the change obviously only becomes active after a reboot hence it doesn't matter which way dpkg handles it. -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Donnerbuehlweg 3, CH-3012 Bern Email: daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net Internet: http://people.progress-technologies.net/~daniel.baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4def340f.8040...@progress-technologies.net
Bug#627837: linux-2.6: Aufs apparently silently dropped, breaking debian-live
On 05/25/2011 12:54 AM, Daniel Baumann wrote: i hereby request that: * the release team overwrites the maintainers 'decision' to downgrade #627837 from severity serious to important by marking #627837 RC by restoring the severity to serious * the release team makes sure that 2.6.39 does *not* migrate to testing before #627837 has been fixed. ping. linux-2.6 has aged 7 of 10 days already.. remeber that should the broken kernel migrate to testing, this will basically mean we can stop doing debian-live work within debian for about as long as it takes until the fixed version of the kernel enters testing again (which can, by experience, be quite long). -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Donnerbuehlweg 3, CH-3012 Bern Email: daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net Internet: http://people.progress-technologies.net/~daniel.baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4de27fe5.7030...@progress-technologies.net
Bug#627837: linux-2.6: Aufs apparently silently dropped, breaking debian-live
On 05/29/2011 08:18 PM, Julien Cristau wrote: Then work with the kernel team to resolve this, and make sure what you need is ready in the future when a new kernel is released, instead of making others chase external patches for you. it has always been ready, that's not the problem. -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Donnerbuehlweg 3, CH-3012 Bern Email: daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net Internet: http://people.progress-technologies.net/~daniel.baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4de29013.8040...@progress-technologies.net
Bug#627837: linux-2.6: Aufs apparently silently dropped, breaking debian-live
On 05/29/2011 09:53 PM, Julien Cristau wrote: Maybe it was ready in your mind, but it wasn't in debian-kernel svn or mailing list (and as far as I can tell the kernel maintainers even checked aufs git before the .39 upload, and didn't find any recent changes there). So yeah, that's exactly the problem. no; aufs.git was up2date. in time. way before. -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Donnerbuehlweg 3, CH-3012 Bern Email: daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net Internet: http://people.progress-technologies.net/~daniel.baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4de2a6b3.3060...@progress-technologies.net
Bug#627837: linux-2.6: Aufs apparently silently dropped, breaking debian-live
On 05/29/2011 10:04 PM, Daniel Baumann wrote: no; aufs.git was up2date. in time. way before. oh.. and before you ask.. 'way before' means 'at least 2011-04-18, but possibly even earlier' (yes, that really is a month before .39 was released). -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Donnerbuehlweg 3, CH-3012 Bern Email: daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net Internet: http://people.progress-technologies.net/~daniel.baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4de2a9a8.4060...@progress-technologies.net
Bug#627837: linux-2.6: Aufs apparently silently dropped, breaking debian-live
On 05/29/2011 10:34 PM, Julien Cristau wrote: The maintainers have already made that call, and I don't see a reason to override their decision. so no change after squeeze, the release team gives a shit about breaking debian-live, sigh. but don't worry, from now on, i will not care anymore either. bye, have fun. -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Donnerbuehlweg 3, CH-3012 Bern Email: daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net Internet: http://people.progress-technologies.net/~daniel.baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4de2b823.8040...@progress-technologies.net
Bug#627837: linux-2.6: Aufs apparently silently dropped, breaking debian-live
On 05/30/2011 04:16 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote: Is there a new canonical repository for aufs? it always was http://git.c3sl.ufpr.br/pub/scm/aufs/aufs2-standalone.git, like referenced from aufs.sf.net. -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Donnerbuehlweg 3, CH-3012 Bern Email: daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net Internet: http://people.progress-technologies.net/~daniel.baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4de32075.7050...@progress-technologies.net
Bug#627837: linux-2.6: Aufs apparently silently dropped, breaking debian-live
Package: linux-2.6 Severity: serious Hi, in 2.6.39, apparently aufs was silently dropped, please re-enable. Regards, Daniel -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Donnerbuehlweg 3, CH-3012 Bern Email: daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net Internet: http://people.progress-technologies.net/~daniel.baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4ddc1269.10...@progress-technologies.net
Bug#627837: Processed: severity of 627837 is important
severity 627837 serious thanks On 05/24/2011 10:42 PM, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: severity 627837 important dropping aufs and not providing any alternative (unionmount) breaks debian-live, on all architectures, completely. breaking debian-live *fundamentally* is RC. -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Donnerbuehlweg 3, CH-3012 Bern Email: daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net Internet: http://people.progress-technologies.net/~daniel.baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4ddc1ec6.6070...@progress-technologies.net
Bug#627837: linux-2.6: Aufs apparently silently dropped, breaking debian-live
tag 627837 patch thanks i've updated aufs in my own kernel tree, feel free to merge: http://vcs.progress-linux.org/?p=packages/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff; h=26a2fd380e516f1df527c0357334eb5e10cdccb3 http://vcs.progress-linux.org/?p=packages/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff; h=973422c91686a621ecd81db1813ed3e77a837b2c Regards, Daniel -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Donnerbuehlweg 3, CH-3012 Bern Email: daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net Internet: http://people.progress-technologies.net/~daniel.baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4ddc339e.20...@progress-technologies.net
Bug#627837: linux-2.6: Aufs apparently silently dropped, breaking debian-live
to prevent further severity ping-pong.. Given that: * 2.6.39 without aufs nor unionmount is not usable in *any* way for debian-live and thus debian-live being completely broken * 2.6.38 has aufs and is in testing * debian-live being a part of debian where we should not release without i hereby request that: * the release team overwrites the maintainers 'decision' to downgrade #627837 from severity serious to important by marking #627837 RC by restoring the severity to serious * the release team makes sure that 2.6.39 does *not* migrate to testing before #627837 has been fixed. Regards, Daniel -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Donnerbuehlweg 3, CH-3012 Bern Email: daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net Internet: http://people.progress-technologies.net/~daniel.baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4ddc3732.8030...@progress-technologies.net
Re: loop-aes in Debian Live
On 03/02/2011 06:12 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote: I seem to recall that Debian Live used to support using loop-aes for persistent storage, and that this is not possible (or difficult) in squeeze because of the removal of prebuilt loop-aes modules generated by linux-modules-extra. Is that correct? having the rootfs encrypted was supported through loop-aes, which is not possible with squeeze, yes. persistency was done through luks which should work with squeeze (it's not much tested though). Max Vozeler worked on a replacement for loop-aes in the form of a compatible cipher mode for dm-crypt; Milan Broz has since polished up his changes; and they were accepted into Linux 2.6.38. nice. If there are a substantial number of Debian Live users with loop-aes partitions, I think we can justify adding a backport of these changes to a point release of the kernel in squeeze. I don't know what changes would be needed outside of the kernel. would be nice if you could include it, so we can advise people that build images with encryption to use backports of live-boot (by automatially including them from live.d.n with lb config -r live.debian.net), once we've updated live-boot to work with it. -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net Internet: http://people.progress-technologies.net/~daniel.baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4d6dda8a.9070...@progress-technologies.net
Re: Uploading linux-2.6 2.6.37-1 to unstable
On 02/08/2011 04:16 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote: AUFS will be included for use in Debian Live if there is a version compatible with 2.6.37. is available, see upstreams repository at http://git.c3sl.ufpr.br/gitweb?p=aufs/aufs2-2.6.git -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net Internet: http://people.progress-technologies.net/~daniel.baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4d539d64.7020...@progress-technologies.net
Bug#607879: System hangs up with mmap.c:873!
On 01/15/2011 03:29 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote: Daniel, please identify the bug fix we need. http://lists.debian.org/debian-live/2011/01/msg00093.html -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net Internet: http://people.progress-technologies.net/~daniel.baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4d31b0ff.2050...@debian.org
Bug#573189: linux-image-2.6.33-2-686: aufs does not work in 2.6.33
severity 573189 important thanks Hi, as we discussed last time, unionfs-fuse is not acceptable. until unionmount is available in upstream, the debian kernels need to have aufs2. either, the kernel team is going to keep applying the aufs2 patches for the kernel =2.6.32, or, we need aufs oot modules back in the archive. If your intention is to no longer include aufs2 within the debian kernel images itself (which i'm quite surpised, because it was clearly said when linux-modules-extra-2.6 were dropped, that aufs will be included in the kernel until unionmount is available, however, you should clearly communicate that to us as you know we hare heavily depending on it, and not just wait until we find out), please state so *now*, so that we can bring aufs oot modules back into the archive. this is quite upsetting. Regards, Daniel -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: daniel.baum...@panthera-systems.net Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4b97a8b8.5070...@debian.org
Re: Upgrade script for libata transition
Ben Hutchings wrote: I have not yet seen any comments from maintainers of the various boot loaders. did you see http://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/2009/12/msg00596.html -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: daniel.baum...@panthera-systems.net Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Upgrade script for libata transition
Ben Hutchings wrote:
Please review and verify that it does the right
thing for your package's configuration file(s).
extlinux in experimental does not reflect the final location and layout
of the configuration file:
/etc/default/extlinux
EXTLINUX_ROOT=${DEVICE}
Regards,
Daniel
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email: daniel.baum...@panthera-systems.net
Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Status of Linux 2.6.31
Ben Hutchings wrote: I'll be requesting removal of linux-modules-extra-2.6 rather than updating it. where was this discussed? how will be binary modules provided in the future? why was debian-live not informed about it, it's critical part of the distribution for building live images. -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: daniel.baum...@panthera-systems.net Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Status of Linux 2.6.31
Ben Hutchings wrote: where was this discussed? Bug report #517130 which is one single message, not a discussion. and the Debian kernel team meeting in Portland. in private then, behind 'closed doors'. :/ how will be binary modules provided in the future? In general they should be built using DKMS or module-assistant. that's unacceptable for those modules that are required by debian-live, which is $unionfs and loop-aes. why was debian-live not informed about it, it's critical part of the distribution for building live images. I've added aufs2 to the kernel image packages precisely because Debian Live needs it. thanks, but please do inform debian-live next time in advance. Is there anything else you need? loop-aes. -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: daniel.baum...@panthera-systems.net Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Status of Linux 2.6.31
Ben Hutchings wrote: If you choose to unsubscribe from debian-kernel then don't complain that you don't hear what the kernel team is doing. wrong; i complain because the kernel team is apparently not communicating to other teams about stuff that is critical for them. if you maintain such a critical package, you need to talk to your users within the distribution when you are intending to change stuff for them. it's not that there would be too many. I assumed, maybe wrongly, that Julian Klode filed #541828 on behalf of Debian Live. julian is not involved in debian-live (and he used the third person when speaking about the debian-live team in #541828. that could have been a clue). -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: daniel.baum...@panthera-systems.net Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Good bye
Hi, I'm leaving the kernel-team. I'm not in uploaders of any kernel modules package anymore (l-m-c-2.6 is RM) and I've removed myself from the alioth project. Good bye and good luck to everyone. Regards, Daniel -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: daniel.baum...@panthera-systems.net Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#499957: linux-modules-contrib-2.6: please re-enable em8300
block 499957 532925 thanks Hi, once you've fixed your module source package to build with a modern kernel, i'm sure someone will enable it again. Regards, Daniel -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: daniel.baum...@panthera-systems.net Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#539399: live-initramfs: kernel 2.6.30 crash
Vladimir Stavrinov wrote: This problem concern with network boot only, while using the same initrd to boot from other media cause no problem. It is strange. well, on non-network boot, the cifs module is not loaded, so no surprise about that :) -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: daniel.baum...@panthera-systems.net Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#504502: btrfs-source - BUG during bonnie
Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: Daniel, did you reproduce this with the mainlined version of btrfs? i reproduced it once with the .29 mainline, which is why i've reassigned it. no idea about .30, you may want to ask the submitter to follow up/reproduce. -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: daniel.baum...@panthera-systems.net Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#537614: Honor dependencies declaired by module source packages
Package: linux-modules-nonfree-2.6 Severity: whislist Hi, in cases like broadcom-sta, where the generated module binary package should depend on broadcom-sta-common, the conglomeration packages should also depend on the auxilliary packages. Currently, there's no mechanism for this. Regards, Daniel -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: daniel.baum...@panthera-systems.net Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: unification filesystems -- packaging aufs2, etc.
Julian Andres Klode wrote: Proposal - It seems to be the best idea to use unionfs-fuse for now (like Ubuntu) until a new kernel-based solution has been packaged. It may also be a good idea to coordinate this with the Ubuntu developers, so both distros can use the same method of filesystem unification. 1. The Debian Live project adds support for unionfs-fuse. this shouldn't be that hard, however, it's a serious regression in terms of speed, therefore i really hope kernel team will accepts aufs2 patches. 2. A new filesystem will be packaged (unionfs2 OR aufs2). 3. aufs will be removed from unstable (or be replaced by aufs2 under the same name). in the meanwhile, having not looked at the issues myself at all, is it reasonably possible to patch aufs1 for 2.6.30? -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: daniel.baum...@panthera-systems.net Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: unification filesystems -- packaging aufs2, etc.
Bernd Schubert wrote: I also would like to get involved into the Debian Live project then very easy and welcome.. please clone git://git.debian.net/git/debian-live/live-initramfs.git and send patches. -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: daniel.baum...@panthera-systems.net Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Removal of rt73-modules
maximilian attems wrote: which ones? open-vm, most prominently. it is annoying enough that linux-2.6 2.6.29 didn't land in testing due too linux-modules-foowhateveruselesspackage-2.6 that was certainly not the cause. -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: daniel.baum...@panthera-systems.net Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Removal of rt73-modules
Ben Hutchings wrote: So, as further discouragement, I would like to get rid of the rt73-modules binary packages. is it enough if this happens for 2.6.30? by linux-modules-contrib-2.6 I think that means removing that source package too. Do you see any problem with this? no; the conglomeration package has to stay. there will be other contrib modules for the next uploads. -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: daniel.baum...@panthera-systems.net Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#521535: [linux-modules-extra-2.6] Please add batmand-gateway modules
Sven Eckelmann wrote: batmand-0.3.1-3 is now in sid and should fix the problem you mentioned. I hope it is now suitable to be build by linux-modules-extra-2.6. thanks; i'll check tonight. -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: daniel.baum...@panthera-systems.net Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#523760: linux-modules-extra-2.6: Please include CDFS modules in l-m-e builds
Eduard Bloch wrote: Renaming the binary package is easier, would that be enough? i was speaking about the binary package, yes. please ping when it entered unstable so i'll add/enable it in lme. -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: daniel.baum...@panthera-systems.net Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#523760: linux-modules-extra-2.6: Please include CDFS modules in l-m-e builds
tags 523760 +moreinfo thanks Hi, Mario Izquierdo (mariodebian) wrote: Please include CDFS modules in linux-modules-extra-2.6 builds. first, we require that the maintainer (CC'ed) is showing his consent with this. second, cdfs-src has to be renamed to cdfs-source before it can be built by linux-modules-extra-2.6. Regards, Daniel -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: daniel.baum...@panthera-systems.net Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#522567: please provide a hint that tp-smapi conflicts with in-kernel hdaps
retitle 522567 tp-smapi should divert mainline modules reassign 522567 tm-smapi-source tags 522567 -moreinfo thanks Hi, the right way to do this for packages that replace modules from mainline, is to divert them. look at latest ipw2100 and ipw2200 packages (snasphot.dn or morgque) where i was doing exactely that. Regards, Daniel -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: daniel.baum...@panthera-systems.net Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#523375: redhat-cluster-source: FTBFS with 2.6.29
Package: redhat-cluster-source Severity: serious Hi, redhat-cluster does not build with 2.6.29, therefore it's disabled in linux-modules-extra-2.6 for the moment. ---snipp--- CC [M] /home/user/linux-modules-extra-2.6/debian/build/build_i386_none_486_redhat-cluster/gfs/acl.o /home/user/linux-modules-extra-2.6/debian/build/build_i386_none_486_redhat-cluster/gfs/acl.c:5:27: error: asm/semaphore.h: No such file or directory /home/user/linux-modules-extra-2.6/debian/build/build_i386_none_486_redhat-cluster/gfs/acl.c: In function 'gfs_acl_validate_remove': /home/user/linux-modules-extra-2.6/debian/build/build_i386_none_486_redhat-cluster/gfs/acl.c:81: error: 'struct task_struct' has no member named 'fsuid' make[7]: *** [/home/user/linux-modules-extra-2.6/debian/build/build_i386_none_486_redhat-cluster/gfs/acl.o] Error 1 make[6]: *** [/home/user/linux-modules-extra-2.6/debian/build/build_i386_none_486_redhat-cluster/gfs] Error 2 make[5]: *** [_module_/home/user/linux-modules-extra-2.6/debian/build/build_i386_none_486_redhat-cluster] Error 2 make[4]: *** [sub-make] Error 2 make[3]: *** [all] Error 2 make[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.29-1-486' make[2]: *** [debian/stamps/build_i386_none_486_redhat-cluster] Error 2 make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/user/linux-modules-extra-2.6' make[1]: *** [build_i386_none_486_redhat-cluster] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/user/linux-modules-extra-2.6' make: *** [debian/stamps/build-base] Error 2 dpkg-buildpackage: failure: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2 (sid_i386)u...@debian:~/linux-modules-extra-2.6$ ---snapp--- Regards, Daniel -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: daniel.baum...@panthera-systems.net Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#521535: [linux-modules-extra-2.6] Please add batmand-gateway modules
tags 521535 +moreinfo thanks disabled again, your package does not provide /usr/src/batmand-gateway.tar.bz2. please fix and tell me when you've uploaded a corrected version. -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: daniel.baum...@panthera-systems.net Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#514611: [linux-modules-extra-2.6] Please add batman-adv modules
tags 514611 +moreinfo thanks disabled again, your package does not provide /usr/src/batman-adv.tar.bz2. please fix and tell me when you've uploaded a corrected version. -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: daniel.baum...@panthera-systems.net Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#521712:
MICHEL-EXTERNAL loos wrote: Could you please provide the missing file! could you please calm down? thanks. In the last few weeks we had a LOT of problems with your packages: first of all, the origin of the problem is that the i386 buildd is fucked up. it build the package but did not upload it yet (to be precise, it did finally upload it today). you can see this here: https://buildd.debian.org/pkg.cgi?pkg=linux-2.6 which is linked from: http://packages.qa.debian.org/l/linux-2.6.html note that running the build architecture is *NOT* the responsiblity of the kernel team, there is no point in bitching the wrong people about it. second, linux-2.6 uploads always gets delayed by having them passing NEW all the time for each release and abi bump. this causes problems with having linux-2.6 and linux-kbuild-2.6 in sync. however, this is *NOT* a problem caused by the kernel team and cannot be fixed by us. there is also no point bitching the wrong people about it. third, all the packages you want are in svn and tagged accordingly. if you really depend on having these packages at *any* given point in time, you an always build it yourself. UTSL, fwiw. and yes, it really sucks that people are not getting this although it is always happening the same way all over again and again, and because people running the *unstable* distribution which is targeted for *developers* and clueful people only, that are able to help themselfs, lamenting about it all the time makes no sense, doesn't help, is boring, and *wastes* our precious time. Regards, Daniel -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: daniel.baum...@panthera-systems.net Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#521646: linux-kbuild-2.6: Not possible to rebuild debian/control
Package: linux-kbuild-2.6 Hi, trying to rebuild debian/control with or without local modifications to control.source.in fails: [...] make[1]: Entering directory `/home/user/linux-kbuild-2.6' chmod +x debian/bin/gencontrol.py debian/bin/gencontrol.py Traceback (most recent call last): File debian/bin/gencontrol.py, line 6, in ? from debian_linux.debian import * ImportError: No module named debian_linux.debian make[1]: *** [debian/control-real] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/user/linux-kbuild-2.6' make: *** [debian/control] Error 2 (sid_i386)u...@debian:~/linux-kbuild-2.6$ -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: daniel.baum...@panthera-systems.net Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#514611: [linux-modules-extra-2.6] Please add batman-adv modules
Sven Eckelmann wrote: Please add batman-adv modules to autobuilt modules. The current version of the package is currently in the new queue due to a source package split. please ping again when lenny is released *and* your source package has made it into unstable, thanks. -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: daniel.baum...@panthera-systems.net Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#502346: virtualbox-ose-modules package older than virtualbox-ose
Tomasz Ka%u017Amierczak wrote: I've already tried that, but it failed. The module doesn't build. There are no error messages nor anything that would tell what's wrong follow what i've said in #502375. -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Handling of linux-modules-*-2.6 during freeze
Luk Claes wrote: t-p-u is not the best alternative IMHO, we're not talking about some package (linux-modules-*2.6) we can easily take out of the release if it breaks without harming lots of users... ack. Either we remove virtualbox-ose from the release or we accept the version in unstable AFAICS, though as I asked before, please let the maintainers comment... it was stupid to upload 1.6.6 to unstable, however, the the only sane thing imho is, to unblock vbox and let that vesion into lenny. the version should be fine. everything else is even more a hassle. -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [Pkg-virtualbox-devel] Handling of linux-modules-*-2.6 during
Michael Meskes wrote: it was stupid to upload 1.6.6 to unstable, however, the the only sane Which of course is easy to say in hindsight. I do not remember seeing a similar statement before the upload. how suprising is that when the upload was made by patrick without prior discussion/announcement/communication/$whatever on the list. however, as indicated already, past is past. This btw is also the reason why it was uploaded to sid. After all it fixes some bugs. for the records: the new upstream version only fixes two bugs: #495028 which is a cosmetic thing and not worth the trouble, and #499623 which is absolutely unimportant - 2.6.27 is post lenny anyway. -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Removing r6040 driver from l-m-e-2.6
Bastian Blank wrote: Hi folks I intend to remove r6040 from l-m-e-2.6. Reasons: - Provided by the upstream kernel - Differences between the version in the kernel (both 2.6.26 and 2.6.27-rc2, marked as 0.16 and 0.18) and the standalone version (marked as 0.17) are huge. It is not possible to see any code differences in the diff. ack. -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: linux-modules-nonfree-2.6 binNMU
Adeodato Simó wrote: Could you ellaborate on what is the binNMU intended to achieve? see #490906. -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: linux-modules-nonfree-2.6 binNMU
Adeodato Simó wrote: Is it i386 only? since 'XS-Autobuild: yes' in control is not evaluated, yes. -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: linux-modules-nonfree-2.6 binNMU
Adeodato Simó wrote: However, it seems the package is not marked for building in the experimental buildd network, so I can't schedule a binNMU. doing a sourceful upload then, thanks. -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: linux-modules-nonfree-2.6 binNMU
Adeodato Simó wrote: You could fix the problem forever instead, doing what Luk said. as you maybe have read on -private, my forced vac due to military service is approaching. i don't have the time to bet my money on the chance that somebody will process the request in time. in order to not block a possible .26 upload soon by waiting until a complying lmn migrated to testing, i'll upload .25 modules now, ask for whitelisting now so that it is in place for next time. but i guess you figured that already. -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#490906: linux-modules-nonfree-2.6: fglrx-module is outdated
tags 490906 +pending forwarded 490906 [EMAIL PROTECTED] thanks Hi, will be fixed by binNMU. Regards, Daniel -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#385553: linux-modules-extra-2.6: Please provide pre-built ndiswrapper modules
Julian Andres Klode wrote: Sorry, I wasn't at home in the last 2 weeks. Should get uploaded this week. I will do some final builds and tests and see if my AM sponsors it, else I will look for another sponsor. take your time - there won't be a 2.6.25 upload anymore anyways; please directly head for 2.6.26. Regards, Daniel -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 2.6.25-2 testing sync
maximilian attems wrote: please hint linux-2.6 2.6.25-6, linux-kbuild-2.6 2.6.25-2, linux-modules-extra-2.6 2.6.25-5 linux-modules-nonfree-2.6 can go too. -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#488343: linux-headers-2.6.24-1-686: useless dependency on gcc-4.1
Ian Zimmerman wrote: Why? Eevn if you must depend on a compiler (and I don't see that, either), why won't just any version of gcc do? because you need to use the same compiler version that was used to build the kernel in order to build modules against the headers. -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#385553: linux-modules-extra-2.6: Please provide pre-built ndiswrapper modules
Any progress on ndiswrapper? -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#488208: virtualbox-ose-modules-2.6-686: vbox version 1.5.6 not 1.6.2
tags 488208 +pending thanks Aris Karagiannidis wrote: The virtualbox on the repositories is version 1.6.2 but the vbox module is version is 1.5.6 and thus is makes the package unsusuable with the following mesage. as soon as .25 goes to testing, which will happen rsn, this is fixed. in the meanwhile, you need to update virtualbox-ose-modules by hand with running m-a a-i virtualbox-ose. -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#385553: linux-modules-extra-2.6: ndiswrapper requires rules target override
Kel Modderman wrote: ndiswrapper has been integrated into a forked linux-modules-extra-2.6 source package[0], and I found that a custom rules override is required for successful building of ndiswrapper in that framework. Please don't override rules, please fix your module-source package instead. As soon as you've uploaded a fixed version, let me know and I'll add it. -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#385553: linux-modules-extra-2.6: ndiswrapper requires rules target override
Lennart Sorensen wrote: Well perhaps documentation on what exactly the calling syntax is, what the nevironment is and such would be helpful. jup, is on my (quite large) todo list. though I prefere to work on the RC issues first, that's why it's not yet done. I managed to get the nvidia driver to build with linux-modules-* for 2.6.24, but for 2.6.25 I can't figure out why it keeps failing. Both versions work great with module-assistant, so something must be different. So far it makes me think what module assistant does is right and what linux-modules-* does must be wrong, but that's probably too simple a view on the problem. we should get nvidia-* really done now. may I have a look at what you have right now? -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#441277: The loop-aes.ko file is missing from loop-aes-modules-2.6.18-5-486
reassign 441277 loop-aes thanks loop-aes is part of l-m-e in lenny and sid, but not etch. -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#403190: misdn-modules-2.6.18-3-686: Freezes SMP systems
reassign 403190 misdn-source thanks misdn is not part of l-m-e, thus reassigning. Regards, Daniel -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#397362: ieee80211-modules-2.6.17-2-686: Fails to modprobe ipw2200 (ipw2200 just build using build with module-assistant)
reassign 397362 ieee80211-source close 397362 thanks ieee80211 has never been part of l-m-e, thus reassigning. Additionally, it was removed prior etch release, thus closing. Regards, Daniel -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#416652: ieee80211-modules-2.6-686 is not installable
reassign 416652 ieee80211-source close 416652 thanks ieee80211 has never been part of l-m-e, thus reassigning. Additionally, it was removed prior etch release, thus closing. Regards, Daniel -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
