Package: linux-headers-4.14.0-3-amd64
Version: 4.14.17-1
When I build VirtualBox kernel modules using linux-headers-4.14.0-3-amd64
version 4.14.17-1, the resulting modules can't be loaded using
linux-image-4.14.0-3-amd64 version 4.14.13-1. When I build the same modules
using headers version
On 27.06.2016 15:45, Ben Hutchings wrote:
Control: tag -1 wontfix
On Mon, 2016-06-27 at 15:20 +0300, Evgeny Kapun wrote:
On 27.06.2016 15:03, Ben Hutchings wrote:
Doesn't lilo fail if a file specified in its configuration is
missing?
Ben.
LILO has an "optional" option which mak
On 27.06.2016 15:03, Ben Hutchings wrote:
Doesn't lilo fail if a file specified in its configuration is missing?
Ben.
LILO has an "optional" option which makes it skip an entry if either the kernel
or the initrd file is missing (or is a broken link).
On 27.06.2016 11:51, Ben Hutchings wrote:
Control: reassign -1 linux-base 4.3
Control: tag -1 moreinfo
On Mon, 2016-06-27 at 03:59 +0300, Evgeny Kapun wrote:
Package: linux-image-4.6.0-1-amd64
Version: 4.6.2-2
When updating the package linux-image-4.6.0-1-amd64 from version
4.6.2-1 to version
Package: linux-image-4.6.0-1-amd64
Version: 4.6.2-2
When updating the package linux-image-4.6.0-1-amd64 from version 4.6.2-1 to
version 4.6.2-2, post-install script printed this:
I: /vmlinuz.old is now a symlink to boot/vmlinuz-4.6.0-1-amd64
I: /initrd.img.old is now a symlink to
Package: initramfs-tools-core
Version: 0.121
If I try to run update-initramfs while busybox is not installed, I get an error
message:
E: busybox is required but not installed
E: /usr/share/initramfs-tools/hooks/busybox failed with return 1.
This happens irrespective of the BUSYBOX
On 20.01.2016 22:41, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Wed, 2016-01-20 at 22:21 +0300, Evgeny Kapun wrote:
Package: initramfs-tools-core
Version: 0.121
If I try to run update-initramfs while busybox is not installed, I get an error
message:
E: busybox is required but not installed
E: /usr
7 matches
Mail list logo
