On Tue, 30 Dec 2014 10:45:10 +,
ow...@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) wrote:
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_itempx=MTM3NDQ
Ok, does this mean cpufrequtils is useless on those systems with modern kernels?
--
Please *no* private copies of mailing list or newsgroup
Package: src:linux
Version: 3.16.0-0.bpo.4
On my other system, which is a laptop, with linux-image-3.2.0-4-amd64
cpufrequtils starts correctly out of the box, and the contents of
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_available_governors is:
powersave userspace conservative ondemand
Matthias could you test the patch from
Matthias http://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg96700.html and follow
Matthias up with information if that fixes your problem?
It seems to fix it (2 days of fetchmail, no MSG_PEEK warnings yet).
--
Ian Zimmerman i...@buug.org
gpg public key: 1024D
I switched to getmail4 and I'm happy with it, so I can't help more.
--
Ian Zimmerman i...@buug.org
gpg public key: 1024D/C6FF61AD
fingerprint: 66DC D68F 5C1B 4D71 2EE5 BD03 8A00 786C C6FF 61AD
Ham is for reading, not for eating.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ
Daniel because you need to use the same compiler version that was used
Daniel to build the kernel in order to build modules against the
Daniel headers.
I didn't know that. Since when is this the case? Is this enforced by
the upstream kernel, or is it an artifact of the Debian infrastructure?
Package: linux-headers-2.6.24-1-686
Version: 2.6.24-7
Severity: minor
Why? Eevn if you must depend on a compiler (and I don't see that, either),
why won't just any version of gcc do?
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
6 matches
Mail list logo
