Hi list,
i was wondering why debian is not, as today, able to give an
openmosix-enabled patched kernel, and it lacks the openmosix userland
utilities. It seems that kernel-patch-openmosix has been put in
oldstable some time ago, but for what reason?
Thanks in advance,
MC
Hi,
i've got an error (maybe a warning) during the boot up process, as
written in /var/log/boot:
Cleaning /tmpfind: warning: you have specified the -maxdepth option
after a non-option argument -perm, but options are not positi
onal (-maxdepth affects tests specified before it as well as
maximilian attems wrote:
dilinger is member of the debian kernel team.
if you'd not trust him, you'd better watch his commits?
--
maks
You're right i'm questioning this, since i've also written to him about
this, he's nice and friendly! No, my question was something in
principle: are we going
Hi,
sorry for the maybe stupid and repetitive question, is it possible to
use the nice features of make-kpkg also with a vanilla kernel coming
from kernel.org or is it required to use the kernel-source from debian
repositories?
Thanks again,
MC
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Marc Haber ha scritto:
Hi,
On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 02:01:02PM +0200, Marco Calviani wrote:
sorry for the maybe stupid and repetitive question, is it possible to
use the nice features of make-kpkg also with a vanilla kernel coming
from kernel.org or is it required to use the kernel-source
Marc Haber ha scritto:
Hi,
On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 02:01:02PM +0200, Marco Calviani wrote:
sorry for the maybe stupid and repetitive question, is it possible to
use the nice features of make-kpkg also with a vanilla kernel coming
from kernel.org or is it required to use the kernel-source
maximilian attems ha scritto:
if you looked at bit in the archive you should have stumbled on that link:
- http://www.acm.cs.rpi.edu/~dilinger/kernel-source-nonfree-2.6.11/
--
maks
Hi,
you've got the point. I can use it, of course, but it is not on an
official debian server. Does it means
maximilian attems wrote:
dilinger is member of the debian kernel team.
if you'd not trust him, you'd better watch his commits?
--
maks
You're right i'm questioning this, since i've also written to him about
this, he's nice and friendly! No, my question was something in
principle: are we going
Piotr Roszatycki wrote:
Why did you remove the tg3 driver? It is the only netcard in my desktops and
servers. The driver without firmware worked perfectly. I don't need the
non-free freeware. I need working installer and kernel packages from main
archive.
Unfortunately the wipe out it...
Hi,
about the speedstep patch i searched a lot before finding it as
you've realized reading that file, it is patching, normally, a 2.6.8
version kernel =-O . It seems however that not everybody that owns a
dothan CPU has the same problem... this is weird for me and not
understandable
Hi,
about the speedstep patch i searched a lot before finding it as
you've realized reading that file, it is patching, normally, a 2.6.8
version kernel =-O . It seems however that not everybody that owns a
dothan CPU has the same problem... this is weird for me and not
understandable
Hi,
i've read here http://lists.debian.org/debian-kern...3/msg00412.html
that the Debian team has decided to wipe out the Broadcom tg3 module
from the 2.6.11 and following releases. I've a laptop which uses this
card to connect to a LAN. Since i must work in a LAN the problem arises.
Is there
Hi,
i've read here http://lists.debian.org/debian-kern...3/msg00412.html
that the Debian team has decided to wipe out the Broadcom tg3 module
from the 2.6.11 and following releases. I've a laptop which uses this
card to connect to a LAN. Since i must work in a LAN the problem arises.
Is there
13 matches
Mail list logo
