Re: linux migration to testing

2022-08-18 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi Ben, On 18-08-2022 23:09, Ben Hutchings wrote: For your info, s390x still fails: https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/s390x/l/linux/24628411/log.gz Also for ppc64el. I noticed right after sending. These two are fixed by: https://salsa.debian.org/kernel-team/linux/-/commit/8d43

Re: linux migration to testing

2022-08-18 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Mon, 2022-08-15 at 22:15 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: > Hi Ben, > > On 01-08-2022 23:09, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > On Mon, 2022-08-01 at 22:53 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: > > > On 01-08-2022 22:46, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > > > Could you please allow this version to enter testing despite the test > >

Re: linux migration to testing

2022-08-15 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi Ben, On 01-08-2022 23:09, Ben Hutchings wrote: On Mon, 2022-08-01 at 22:53 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: On 01-08-2022 22:46, Ben Hutchings wrote: Could you please allow this version to enter testing despite the test failures? If you promise to fix it in the next upload. Yes, the fix is alr

Re: linux migration to testing

2022-08-01 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Mon, 2022-08-01 at 22:53 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: > Hi Ben, > > On 01-08-2022 22:46, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > linux 5.18.14-1 is currently blocked from migration due to a test > > regression on some architectures. > > > > This is actually not a regression: there's a new test case, and it was

Re: linux migration to testing

2022-08-01 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi Ben, On 01-08-2022 22:46, Ben Hutchings wrote: linux 5.18.14-1 is currently blocked from migration due to a test regression on some architectures. This is actually not a regression: there's a new test case, and it was defined wrongly for architectures other than amd64 and arm64. That should