Re: [PATCH] remove debian/linux-support-* on clean

2010-11-17 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Mon, 2010-11-15 at 12:55 +0200, Timo Juhani Lindfors wrote:
 Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk writes:
  However, the same applies to several other package names that change
  with the upstream version number: linux-source-version,
  linux-doc-version, linux-manual-version and
  linux-patch-debian-version.  I think perhaps we should remove those
  with wildcards as well.
 
 Sure, should I send a new patch or is it easier for you to just edit
 the file and commit?
 
 (I didn't notice those other cases since I only build -image, -headers
 and -dbg).

Please send a new patch.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: [PATCH] remove debian/linux-support-* on clean

2010-11-15 Thread Timo Juhani Lindfors
Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk writes:
 However, the same applies to several other package names that change
 with the upstream version number: linux-source-version,
 linux-doc-version, linux-manual-version and
 linux-patch-debian-version.  I think perhaps we should remove those
 with wildcards as well.

Sure, should I send a new patch or is it easier for you to just edit
the file and commit?

(I didn't notice those other cases since I only build -image, -headers
and -dbg).


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/847hgeam9w@sauna.l.org



Re: [PATCH] remove debian/linux-support-* on clean

2010-11-14 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Wed, 2010-11-10 at 09:54 +0200, Timo Juhani Lindfors wrote:
 Hi,
 
 it seems that if I debuild the linux-2.6 package multiple times in a
 row and increment the version number it does not remove the old
 debian/linux-support-* directories.
 
 Is there some reason why it is not removed on clean? If not, would the
 attached patch be ok?

There is no particular reason not to do this.

However, the same applies to several other package names that change
with the upstream version number: linux-source-version,
linux-doc-version, linux-manual-version and
linux-patch-debian-version.  I think perhaps we should remove those
with wildcards as well.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[PATCH] remove debian/linux-support-* on clean

2010-11-09 Thread Timo Juhani Lindfors
Hi,

it seems that if I debuild the linux-2.6 package multiple times in a
row and increment the version number it does not remove the old
debian/linux-support-* directories.

Is there some reason why it is not removed on clean? If not, would the
attached patch be ok?

Index: linux-2.6/debian/rules
===
--- linux-2.6/debian/rules	(revision 16542)
+++ linux-2.6/debian/rules	(working copy)
@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@
 
 clean: debian/control
 	dh_testdir
-	rm -rf $(BUILD_DIR) $(STAMPS_DIR) debian/lib/python/debian_linux/*.pyc debian/linux-headers-* debian/linux-image-* debian/linux-tools-*
+	rm -rf $(BUILD_DIR) $(STAMPS_DIR) debian/lib/python/debian_linux/*.pyc debian/linux-headers-* debian/linux-image-* debian/linux-tools-* debian/linux-support-*
 	dh_clean
 
 binary-indep: $(STAMPS_DIR)/source-base