Ben,
This still adds configuration for 'powerpc' and 'ppc64' flavours, which
do not exist for ppc64el! Please send a new version of this patch.
Sure. I will review and test it on the other ports.
I guess I am confusing the symlinks for the #include paths in some form.
I just sent a V3 for
Hi Ben and Bastian,
On 06/04/2014 09:06 AM, Mauricio Faria de Oliveira wrote:
This patch-set adds support to the ppc64el port in the linux source package.
It includes fixes and improvements to the previous 'PATCH' submission [0].
Would you have any further comments/corrections/recommendations
On Thu, 2014-06-12 at 10:46 -0300, Mauricio Faria de Oliveira wrote:
Hi Ben and Bastian,
On 06/04/2014 09:06 AM, Mauricio Faria de Oliveira wrote:
This patch-set adds support to the ppc64el port in the linux source package.
It includes fixes and improvements to the previous 'PATCH'
Hi Ben,
I have not yet applied:
[4] ppc64el: kernel: config: enable HTM as common powerpc64 option
because it results in a module ABI change for existing powerpc64
configurations. I could make the config change just for ppc64el at the
moment, if you like. We can apply it when we have a
On Thu, 2014-06-12 at 19:16 -0300, Mauricio Faria de Oliveira wrote:
Hi Ben,
I have not yet applied:
[4] ppc64el: kernel: config: enable HTM as common powerpc64 option
because it results in a module ABI change for existing powerpc64
configurations. I could make the config change
This patch-set adds support to the ppc64el port in the linux source package.
It includes fixes and improvements to the previous 'PATCH' submission [0].
Thank you for the comments, discussions, and patience kindly had so far. :)
As always, any feedback is welcome.
Changes from PATCH (v1) [0]
On Wed, 2014-06-04 at 09:06 -0300, Mauricio Faria de Oliveira wrote:
This patch-set adds support to the ppc64el port in the linux source package.
It includes fixes and improvements to the previous 'PATCH' submission [0].
Thank you for the comments, discussions, and patience kindly had so
On 06/04/2014 09:31 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
I only got 8 following patches, but it looks the 9th was an accidental
commit containing copies of the preceding 8 patches:
Oops. Yes, exactly.
I removed that file, but missed updating the cover letter. Apologies.
--
Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
IBM
8 matches
Mail list logo