On Fri, 16 Dec 2011 04:39:49 +, Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk wrote:
Non-text part: multipart/signed
On Fri, 2011-12-16 at 14:26 +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
On Wed, 14 Dec 2011 11:20:03 -0500, John W. Linville
linvi...@tuxdriver.com wrote:
We really want to indicate out-of-support
On Wed, 14 Dec 2011 11:20:03 -0500, John W. Linville linvi...@tuxdriver.com
wrote:
In some cases, it might be desirable to package a module from an
external source tree alongside the base kernel. In those cases, it
might also be desirable to not have those modules tainting the kernel.
This
On Fri, 2011-12-16 at 14:26 +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
On Wed, 14 Dec 2011 11:20:03 -0500, John W. Linville
linvi...@tuxdriver.com wrote:
In some cases, it might be desirable to package a module from an
external source tree alongside the base kernel. In those cases, it
might also be
On Wed, 2011-12-14 at 11:20 -0500, John W. Linville wrote:
In some cases, it might be desirable to package a module from an
external source tree alongside the base kernel. In those cases, it
might also be desirable to not have those modules tainting the kernel.
This patch provides a
In some cases, it might be desirable to package a module from an
external source tree alongside the base kernel. In those cases, it
might also be desirable to not have those modules tainting the kernel.
This patch provides a mechanism for an external module build to declare
itself as an
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 04:52:00PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Wed, 2011-12-14 at 11:20 -0500, John W. Linville wrote:
In some cases, it might be desirable to package a module from an
external source tree alongside the base kernel. In those cases, it
might also be desirable to not have
6 matches
Mail list logo
