On Sun, 2010-02-21 at 23:20 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
[...]
I think this is something we will also consider doing in Debian. A year
from now I expect nv to be dead and radeon UMS to be removed upstream,
making it impractical to backport new hardware support. Given that, the
maintenance
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 23:20:14 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
Fedora has been backporting drm (and nouveau) for a long time but it's
not so clear what means for RHEL.
I think this is something we will also consider doing in Debian. A year
from now I expect nv to be dead and radeon UMS to be
On Sun, 21 Feb 2010 23:20:14 +, Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk wrote:
On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 14:40 -0800, Bryce Harrington wrote:
[...]
From apw's Kernel Summary, about why we are going with 2.6.32:
The primary decision for the kernel team at UDS is to choose the base
kernel
On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 14:40 -0800, Bryce Harrington wrote:
[...]
From apw's Kernel Summary, about why we are going with 2.6.32:
The primary decision for the kernel team at UDS is to choose the base
kernel version for the release. For Lucid this will be 2.6.32. This
version has just
4 matches
Mail list logo