Your message dated Mon, 4 Mar 2024 11:31:38 +0100 with message-id <20240304103138.jvussu4gqb2zv...@shell.thinkmo.de> and subject line Re: Bug#1064838: New package names break APT safety features, ability to co-install different ABIs has caused the Debian Bug report #1064838, regarding New package names break APT safety features, ability to co-install different ABIs to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1064838: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1064838 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---Source: linux Severity: serious X-Debbugs-Cc: j...@debian.org After we had discussed the new proposal a couple months ago and were left with severe open questions and concerns it seems that these have been ignored and the packages uploaded anyway, breaking APT's algorithm that ensures the currently booted kernel is not offered for removal, as well as possibly others. In addition, this means that the ABI changes within the same package names, causing different ABIs to no longer be co-installable, which can have drastic effect on thef function of systems: - modules will fail to load until you reboot - modules needed to reboot will fail to load until you reboot (if any) I do not believe fucking up our users for convenience of the maintainers and lacking of tools on the ftpmaster side to automatically approve new ABI renames is the right call here. As such if this change is not reverted, I intend to reassign this to the technical committee for deliberation. -- System Information: Debian Release: trixie/sid APT prefers noble APT policy: (500, 'noble'), (500, 'mantic-security') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 6.8.0-11-generic (SMP w/16 CPU threads; PREEMPT) Kernel taint flags: TAINT_PROPRIETARY_MODULE, TAINT_OOT_MODULE Locale: LANG=C.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=C.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to C.UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) LSM: AppArmor: enabled -- debian developer - deb.li/jak | jak-linux.org - free software dev ubuntu core developer i speak de, en
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 07:52:10PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote: > The change for that is not even in. Where do you see it? No new information where the mentioned change is actually, closing until any is provided. Bastian -- Humans do claim a great deal for that particular emotion (love). -- Spock, "The Lights of Zetar", stardate 5725.6
--- End Message ---
