On Feb 24, Horms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > $ dpkg -S /etc/dev.d/net/hotplug.dev
> > But this is a net subsystem script, so it's not supposed to be run for a
> > character device.
> Can you trace the first call of hotplug and see what happens?
If I create a tap device with "uml_switch -tap t
On Thu, Feb 24, 2005 at 11:18:55AM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Feb 24, Horms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > $ dpkg -S /etc/dev.d/net/hotplug.dev
> But this is a net subsystem script, so it's not supposed to be run for a
> character device.
Can you trace the first call of hotplug and see wha
On Feb 24, Horms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> $ dpkg -S /etc/dev.d/net/hotplug.dev
But this is a net subsystem script, so it's not supposed to be run for a
character device.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Thu, Feb 24, 2005 at 10:10:45AM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Feb 24, Horms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > udev names tun net/tun, and as it now thinks it is a net device, calls
> > hotplug tun
> What makes you think that udev calls hotplug? This is not how I know it
> works.
This makes m
On Feb 24, Horms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> udev names tun net/tun, and as it now thinks it is a net device, calls
> hotplug tun
What makes you think that udev calls hotplug? This is not how I know it
works.
> In udev thinking tun is a net device?
I don't think so, see the difference between t
On Thu, Feb 24, 2005 at 02:24:38AM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Feb 24, Horms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Ok, that is curious, because as I mentioned, I don't have that file
> > and it seems to work fine. That is, I can't reproduce the problem.
> I do, but I cannot reproduce it either.
>
On Feb 24, Horms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok, that is curious, because as I mentioned, I don't have that file
> and it seems to work fine. That is, I can't reproduce the problem.
I do, but I cannot reproduce it either.
> Artur, where did that file come from? Does it belong to a package?
It's
On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 02:37:59PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Feb 23, Horms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > So why net.agent ends up being called for it?
> > The funny thing is, that it doesn't for me.
> Neither for me.
>
> > If you conpare the trace I sent and the one that Artur sent
> >
On Feb 23, Horms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > So why net.agent ends up being called for it?
> The funny thing is, that it doesn't for me.
Neither for me.
> If you conpare the trace I sent and the one that Artur sent
> we see this difference
>
> Feb 11 00:12:42 blabluga udev[6599]: configured r
On Tue, Feb 22, 2005 at 12:15:26PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Feb 22, Horms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Ok, no one listened to my explanation the first time around,
> > so here is the point-form version.
> >
> > * Tun is a misc device.
> > * It is not a net device.
> So why net.agent en
On Feb 22, Horms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok, no one listened to my explanation the first time around,
> so here is the point-form version.
>
> * Tun is a misc device.
> * It is not a net device.
So why net.agent ends up being called for it?
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digit
On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 01:39:46AM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> reassign 294303 kernel-source-2.6.10
> retitle 294303 tun does not set $INTERFACE for hotplug events
> thanks
>
> On Feb 11, "Artur R. Czechowski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > I am wondering if the reclassification made by
> >
On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 10:02:29AM +0100, Artur R. Czechowski wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 04:46:33PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 12:19:29AM +0100, Artur R. Czechowski wrote:
> [cut]
> > > BTW, if you find it usefull, snippet of log with uncommented DEBUG in
> > > /etc/hotpl
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 294303 kernel-source-2.6.10
Bug#294303: hotplug: Bad NET invocation: $INTERFACE is not set
Bug reassigned from package `hotplug' to `kernel-source-2.6.10'.
> retitle 294303 tun does not set $INTERFACE for hotplug events
Bug
reassign 294303 kernel-source-2.6.10
retitle 294303 tun does not set $INTERFACE for hotplug events
thanks
On Feb 11, "Artur R. Czechowski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I am wondering if the reclassification made by
> > /etc/udev/rules.d/udev.rules is correct, given
Reclassification? udev just s
On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 04:46:33PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 12:19:29AM +0100, Artur R. Czechowski wrote:
[cut]
> > BTW, if you find it usefull, snippet of log with uncommented DEBUG in
> > /etc/hotplug.d/default/default.hotplug follows:
> Thanks, that is most useful ineed.
> I
On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 12:19:29AM +0100, Artur R. Czechowski wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 10:18:47AM +0900, Horms wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 02:22:26PM +0100, Artur R. Czechowski wrote:
> > > On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 07:47:25PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> > > > I did a bit of poking around, u
On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 10:18:47AM +0900, Horms wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 02:22:26PM +0100, Artur R. Czechowski wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 07:47:25PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> > > I did a bit of poking around, uncomented the DEBUG line (line 33) in
> > > /etc/hotplug.d/default/default.ho
On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 02:22:26PM +0100, Artur R. Czechowski wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 07:47:25PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 02:25:55AM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> > > On Feb 09, "Artur R. Czechowski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > I've got following message when m
On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 07:47:25PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 02:25:55AM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> > On Feb 09, "Artur R. Czechowski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I've got following message when modprobing tun:
> > > Feb 9 02:03:32 blabluga net.agent[16792]: Bad NET invoc
On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 02:25:55AM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Feb 09, "Artur R. Czechowski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I've got following message when modprobing tun:
> > Feb 9 02:03:32 blabluga net.agent[16792]: Bad NET invocation: $INTERFACE
> > is not set
> >
> > Well, I am not su
On Feb 09, "Artur R. Czechowski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've got following message when modprobing tun:
> Feb 9 02:03:32 blabluga net.agent[16792]: Bad NET invocation: $INTERFACE is
> not set
>
> Well, I am not sure if it has any meaning. If not it would be nice when
> this message would
22 matches
Mail list logo
