On Thu, Nov 16, 2006 at 10:51:24AM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
I am a bit concerned by the comment in the link you posted:
To fully work, some modifications are needed to samba smbmount.c and
smbmnt.c files. Those patches are available at Samba and Kernel Bug
Tracker pages.
On Mon, Nov 27, 2006 at 07:27:39PM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
The downside is that any sarge users who might be relying on the
use-the-server-provided-value behavior will no longer have that
option. I don't understand this case enough to know if it has any
practical implications. I would guess
Dear sirs,
It's been a long time since I've made those patches but I have never
known why the user level patches were not applied. I still think they
are necessary.
Haroldo
On Mon, 2006-11-27 at 19:27 -0700, dann frazier wrote:
On Thu, Nov 16, 2006 at 10:51:24AM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
dann frazier wrote:
On Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 12:22:59PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
Yes, because this is a kernel security bug. The smbmount patch was
entertained pre-sarge only as a stopgap due to the proximity to release; the
right place to fix this is still in the kernel (upstream as
On Wed, Nov 15, 2006 at 05:54:52PM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
On Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 12:22:59PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
Yes, because this is a kernel security bug. The smbmount patch was
entertained pre-sarge only as a stopgap due to the proximity to release; the
right place to fix
On Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 12:22:59PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
Yes, because this is a kernel security bug. The smbmount patch was
entertained pre-sarge only as a stopgap due to the proximity to release; the
right place to fix this is still in the kernel (upstream as appropriate).
I've done
On Wed, Nov 15, 2006 at 05:54:52PM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
On Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 12:22:59PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
Yes, because this is a kernel security bug. The smbmount patch was
entertained pre-sarge only as a stopgap due to the proximity to release; the
right place to fix
On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 10:28:10PM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
On Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 01:30:19PM +0900, Horms wrote:
If you point me at the patch I'll be happy to rack my brains and
tell you want I was thinking at the time.
Thanks Horms, here's the link:
On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 09:28:14PM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
Moritz pointed out that this issue has been overlooked for sarge
updates so far. From my reading of this report, it sounds like our
best option for sarge is to incorporate Horms' patch for 2.4.27.
Thanks for looking at this.
I
On Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 10:09:52AM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
Thanks for looking at this.
I initially reported this issue to samba and then I provided a patch for
smbmout. Now if the issue is fixed in the kernel instead, then all
kernel providing smbfs need to be fixed, not only
On Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 09:26:10AM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
On Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 10:09:52AM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
Thanks for looking at this.
I initially reported this issue to samba and then I provided a patch for
smbmout. Now if the issue is fixed in the kernel instead,
On Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 05:49:56PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
On Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 09:26:10AM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
On Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 10:09:52AM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
Thanks for looking at this.
I initially reported this issue to samba and then I provided a
Moritz pointed out that this issue has been overlooked for sarge
updates so far. From my reading of this report, it sounds like our
best option for sarge is to incorporate Horms' patch for 2.4.27.
Does anyone object to this?
I'll make builds available for testing prior to uploading, in case
On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 09:28:14PM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
Moritz pointed out that this issue has been overlooked for sarge
updates so far. From my reading of this report, it sounds like our
best option for sarge is to incorporate Horms' patch for 2.4.27.
Does anyone object to this?
On Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 01:30:19PM +0900, Horms wrote:
If you point me at the patch I'll be happy to rack my brains and
tell you want I was thinking at the time.
Thanks Horms, here's the link:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi/smbfs.no_cap_unix.patch?bug=310982;msg=101;att=1
--
15 matches
Mail list logo
