On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 06:16:51PM +, Tom Parker wrote:
On 25 February 2010 18:15, Moritz Muehlenhoff j...@inutil.org wrote:
Did you report this at http://bugzilla.kernel.org ?
Haven't yet. Somewhere on the todo list...
What's the status?
Cheers,
Moritz
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
On 25 February 2010 18:15, Moritz Muehlenhoff j...@inutil.org wrote:
Did you report this at http://bugzilla.kernel.org ?
Haven't yet. Somewhere on the todo list...
Tom
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 04:46:31AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Sat, 2010-02-06 at 09:31 +, Tom Parker wrote:
On 2 February 2010 21:16, maximilian attems m...@stro.at wrote:
Squeeze will release with 2.6.32 can anyone of you still
reproduce this?
also please make sure to use
On Sat, 2010-02-06 at 09:31 +, Tom Parker wrote:
On 2 February 2010 21:16, maximilian attems m...@stro.at wrote:
Squeeze will release with 2.6.32 can anyone of you still
reproduce this?
also please make sure to use latest powertop, aka
ii powertop 1.13~pre201001 Linux tool to
On 2 February 2010 21:16, maximilian attems m...@stro.at wrote:
Squeeze will release with 2.6.32 can anyone of you still
reproduce this?
also please make sure to use latest powertop, aka
ii powertop 1.13~pre201001 Linux tool to find out what is using power
palf...@drone:[~] dpkg -l
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 11:16 PM, maximilian attems m...@stro.at wrote:
currently this bug looks like a bug that has been fixed since.
Seconded. I was following unstable all this time, and this bug didn't
resurface since at least 2.6.31, and I definitely don't see it now.
ii
On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 04:37:48AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Wed, 2010-02-03 at 00:13 -0200, Renato S. Yamane wrote:
Em 02-02-2010 19:16, maximilian attems escreveu:
Squeeze will release with 2.6.32 can anyone of you still
reproduce this?
also please make sure to use latest
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 521944 moreinfo
Bug #521944 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.29-1-686: Excessive number of
interrupts from hrtimer_start_expires
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
stop
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug
tags 521944 moreinfo
stop
hello,
Squeeze will release with 2.6.32 can anyone of you still
reproduce this?
also please make sure to use latest powertop, aka
ii powertop 1.13~pre201001 Linux tool to find out what is using power
currently this bug looks like a bug that has been fixed
Em 02-02-2010 19:16, maximilian attems escreveu:
Squeeze will release with 2.6.32 can anyone of you still
reproduce this?
also please make sure to use latest powertop, aka
ii powertop 1.13~pre201001 Linux tool to find out what is using power
$ uname -a
Linux mandachuva 2.6.30-2-686 #1
On Wed, 2010-02-03 at 00:13 -0200, Renato S. Yamane wrote:
Em 02-02-2010 19:16, maximilian attems escreveu:
Squeeze will release with 2.6.32 can anyone of you still
reproduce this?
also please make sure to use latest powertop, aka
ii powertop 1.13~pre201001 Linux tool to find out
So sorry, but someone taking a looking here?
This bug make me lost an important time, because battery is drained very faster.
Regards,
Renato S. Yamane
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
I have seem this bug on my Lenovo 3000-V200 laptop too!
Battery is drained very fast!
With Lenny, my battery go to 10% after ~3,5h but with Squeeze the battery go to
10% after 2,5h.
And powertop show me a strange value:
Uso de energia (estimado por ACPI): 191,6 W (0,2 horas)
191,6W??
$
Package: linux-image-2.6.29-1-686
Version: 2.6.29-1
Severity: normal
Running powertop on the 2.6.29-1 kernel gets me the following
Top causes for wakeups:
50.8% (126.3) kernel core : hrtimer_start_expires (tick_sched_timer)
12.8% ( 31.7) kernel IPI : Rescheduling interrupts
7.4%
14 matches
Mail list logo
