Package: firmware-linux-nonfree
Version: 20160824-1
Followup-For: Bug #522415
Dear Maintainer,
FWIW I also think that having the meta packages bring in as many
firmware packages as possible can be useful.
I would put the dependency in the firmware-linux-nonfree package rather
than in the
On Sat, 04 Apr 2009, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> All firmware that comes from the upstream firmware/ directory will be
> included in the firmware-linux package, not a driver/vendor-specific
> package. This accounts for an increasing majority of the firmware.
This prediction doesn't seem to have come
Hi Ben,
On Sonntag, 5. April 2009, Ben Hutchings wrote:
All firmware that comes from the upstream firmware/ directory will be
included in the firmware-linux package, not a driver/vendor-specific
package. This accounts for an increasing majority of the firmware.
Thanks for the explaination.
On Samstag, 4. April 2009, maximilian attems wrote:
and here comes a fsf purist :P wanting better usability.
as i told you this will be anyway the tendancy
as all newer firmware will land in f-linux.
eparse.
hint: te bts aint sms, ya ca use pr0per inglish.
signature.asc
Description: This is
Package: firmware-nonfree
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
would it be possible to create an umbrella package which would depend on all
firmware-* packages, so every new firmware package would be installed
automatically ?
Thanks,
Xav
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT
On Fri, Apr 03, 2009 at 04:49:49PM +0200, Xavier Bestel wrote:
Package: firmware-nonfree
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
would it be possible to create an umbrella package which would depend on all
firmware-* packages, so every new firmware package would be installed
automatically ?
no this
Hi,
On Samstag, 4. April 2009, maximilian attems wrote:
no this is not possible due to license differences.
ipwX needs a click through, but there will be soon unification
as bnx2 will land in firmware-linux and so on..
huh? you need to accept the ipwX licence anyway (else the package will be
On Sat, Apr 04, 2009 at 01:00:27AM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
installed but not the firmware), so a depends would work.
I'd prefer a all-firmwarez meta-package though, which _recommends_ all binary
packages build from the firmware-nonfree source package :-)
(recommends are installed per
8 matches
Mail list logo
