Bug#580026: [drm/i915] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP in i915_gem_execbuffer

2011-12-22 Thread Jonathan Nieder
merge 582088 580026 593793 quit Thiemo Nagel wrote (regarding an oops in i915_gem_execbuffer): Let's see whether I hit the problem again. I assume the odds are low, though, as I've only seen it once in 2.6.32-4. Ok, smells like another randomish symptom of memory corruption. I assume this

Bug#580026: [drm/i915] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP in i915_gem_execbuffer

2010-05-05 Thread Thiemo Nagel
On 05/03/2010 03:20 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote: It was only accepted earlier today, so it may take another day to propagate. I've installed it. Let's see whether I hit the problem again. I assume the odds are low, though, as I've only seen it once in 2.6.32-4. Cheers, Thiemo -- To

Bug#580026: [drm/i915] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP in i915_gem_execbuffer

2010-05-03 Thread Julien Cristau
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 14:15:51 +0200, Thiemo Nagel wrote: If this is reproducible with linux-image-2.6.32-5-686 (version 2.6.32-12) Where can I get 2.6.32-5? Should be on the mirrors since earlier today, I think. http://packages.debian.org/sid/linux-image-2.6.32-5-686 Cheers, Julien

Bug#580026: [drm/i915] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP in i915_gem_execbuffer

2010-05-03 Thread Thiemo Nagel
Julien Cristau wrote: Reassigning to the kernel. Sorry for filing against the wrong package. If this is reproducible with linux-image-2.6.32-5-686 (version 2.6.32-12) Where can I get 2.6.32-5? Cheers, Thiemo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a

Bug#580026: [drm/i915] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP in i915_gem_execbuffer

2010-05-03 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Mon, 2010-05-03 at 14:26 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 14:15:51 +0200, Thiemo Nagel wrote: If this is reproducible with linux-image-2.6.32-5-686 (version 2.6.32-12) Where can I get 2.6.32-5? Should be on the mirrors since earlier today, I think.