Package: linux-tools-2.6
Severity: normal
$ sudo aptitude install linux-tools-2.6
The following NEW packages will be installed:
linux-tools-2.6 linux-tools-2.6.32{ab}
0 packages upgraded, 2 newly installed, 0 to remove and 409 not upgraded.
Need to get 291kB of archives. After unpacking 549kB
On Sun, 2010-07-25 at 09:27 +0300, Török Edwin wrote:
[...]
Why does linux-tools-2.6 require a specific version of binutils?
It uses libbfd.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 01:12:42PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Sun, 2010-07-25 at 09:27 +0300, Török Edwin wrote:
[...]
Why does linux-tools-2.6 require a specific version of binutils?
It uses libbfd.
Okay, so linux-2.6 is now part of a much larger bunch of tightly coupled
packages.
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 15:16:50 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 01:12:42PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Sun, 2010-07-25 at 09:27 +0300, Török Edwin wrote:
[...]
Why does linux-tools-2.6 require a specific version of binutils?
It uses libbfd.
Okay, so linux-2.6
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 03:30:42PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
Would it be possible to link it against libbfd.a instead?
I would just merge it into linux-kbuild-2.6, the only package building
userspace binaries.
Bastian
--
Conquest is easy. Control is not.
-- Kirk, Mirror,
On Sun, 2010-07-25 at 15:30 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 15:16:50 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 01:12:42PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Sun, 2010-07-25 at 09:27 +0300, Török Edwin wrote:
[...]
Why does linux-tools-2.6 require a
6 matches
Mail list logo
