On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 09:44:28AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 09:29:20AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
Right, it seems that I forgot a single break-statement (causing the
driver to fall through to the undetected part). Attached patch has this
fixed and should work
On Sun, Oct 03, 2010 at 02:02:32PM +0200, Giel van Schijndel wrote:
On Sun, Oct 03, 2010 at 09:14:44AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
On Sun, Oct 03, 2010 at 01:14:24AM +0200, Giel van Schijndel wrote:
On Sat, Oct 02, 2010 at 08:42:19PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Tue, 2010-09-28 at 10:36
On Sun, Oct 03, 2010 at 02:47:11PM +0200, Giel van Schijndel wrote:
On Sun, Oct 03, 2010 at 11:21:42AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
On Sun, Oct 03, 2010 at 01:33:23AM +0200, Giel van Schijndel wrote:
On Sun, Oct 03, 2010 at 01:14:24AM +0200, Giel van Schijndel wrote:
On Sat, Oct 02, 2010 at
On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 08:40:33 +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
On Sun, Oct 03, 2010 at 14:02:32 +0200, Giel van Schijndel wrote:
On Sun, Oct 03, 2010 at 09:14:44 +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
On Sun, Oct 03, 2010 at 01:14:24AM +0200, Giel van Schijndel wrote:
[1]
On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 09:29:20AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
Right, it seems that I forgot a single break-statement (causing the
driver to fall through to the undetected part). Attached patch has this
fixed and should work properly.
I may have fucked up, but it looks like it doesn't work
On Sun, Oct 03, 2010 at 01:14:24AM +0200, Giel van Schijndel wrote:
On Sat, Oct 02, 2010 at 08:42:19PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Tue, 2010-09-28 at 10:36 +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 12:36:04PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.32-23
On Sun, Oct 03, 2010 at 01:33:23AM +0200, Giel van Schijndel wrote:
On Sun, Oct 03, 2010 at 01:14:24AM +0200, Giel van Schijndel wrote:
On Sat, Oct 02, 2010 at 08:42:19PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Tue, 2010-09-28 at 10:36 +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
I would also be interested in the
On Sun, Oct 03, 2010 at 09:14:44AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
On Sun, Oct 03, 2010 at 01:14:24AM +0200, Giel van Schijndel wrote:
On Sat, Oct 02, 2010 at 08:42:19PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Tue, 2010-09-28 at 10:36 +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
I would also be interested in the watchdog
On Sun, Oct 03, 2010 at 11:21:42AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
On Sun, Oct 03, 2010 at 01:33:23AM +0200, Giel van Schijndel wrote:
On Sun, Oct 03, 2010 at 01:14:24AM +0200, Giel van Schijndel wrote:
On Sat, Oct 02, 2010 at 08:42:19PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Tue, 2010-09-28 at 10:36 +0200,
On Tue, 2010-09-28 at 10:36 +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 12:36:04PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.32-23
Severity: wishlist
Tags: squeeze
I installed a fresh squeeze on a new PC with a MSI P55M-GD45 motherboard
that uses a f71889fg
On Sat, Oct 02, 2010 at 08:42:19PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Tue, 2010-09-28 at 10:36 +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 12:36:04PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.32-23
Severity: wishlist
Tags: squeeze
I installed a fresh squeeze on a new PC
On Sun, Oct 03, 2010 at 01:14:24AM +0200, Giel van Schijndel wrote:
On Sat, Oct 02, 2010 at 08:42:19PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Tue, 2010-09-28 at 10:36 +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
I would also be interested in the watchdog support for the same chip,
That patch does *not* add watchdog
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 12:36:04PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.32-23
Severity: wishlist
Tags: squeeze
I installed a fresh squeeze on a new PC with a MSI P55M-GD45 motherboard
that uses a f71889fg sensor chip. Unfortunately, while lm-sensors'
sensor-detect is
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.32-23
Severity: wishlist
Tags: squeeze
I installed a fresh squeeze on a new PC with a MSI P55M-GD45 motherboard
that uses a f71889fg sensor chip. Unfortunately, while lm-sensors'
sensor-detect is able to find the chip and suggest a kernel module, the
module doesn't
14 matches
Mail list logo
