On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 07:27:00PM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
severity 644198 wishlist
found 644198 linux-2.6/3.2.10-1
tags 644198 + moreinfo
quit
Hi,
Kurt Roeckx wrote:
Can you please chang the bug control file to use:
Submit-As: src:linux-2.6
instead of the current:
Kurt Roeckx wrote:
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 07:27:00PM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Kurt Roeckx wrote:
Can you please chang the bug control file to use:
Submit-As: src:linux-2.6
instead of the current:
Submit-As: linux-2.6
What would be the benefit?
That it's filed against an existing
On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 05:40:55AM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Kurt Roeckx wrote:
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 07:27:00PM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Kurt Roeckx wrote:
Can you please chang the bug control file to use:
Submit-As: src:linux-2.6
instead of the current:
Submit-As:
Kurt Roeckx wrote:
On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 05:40:55AM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
To avoid confusion when people misfile bugs about a source package,
it seems that the BTS invents a fake package binary package for any
source package package.
From where do you get that that is actually
severity 644198 wishlist
found 644198 linux-2.6/3.2.10-1
tags 644198 + moreinfo
quit
Hi,
Kurt Roeckx wrote:
Can you please chang the bug control file to use:
Submit-As: src:linux-2.6
instead of the current:
Submit-As: linux-2.6
What would be the benefit? Any downsides?
Curious,
Jonathan
Package: src:linux-2.6
Hi,
Can you please chang the bug control file to use:
Submit-As: src:linux-2.6
instead of the current:
Submit-As: linux-2.6
That way the BTS will properly know this is a bug against a source
package and not a binary package.
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
6 matches
Mail list logo
