Re: Bug#680699: unblock: flash-kernel/3.1

2012-07-08 Thread Philipp Kern
On Sun, Jul 08, 2012 at 10:44:47AM +0200, Arnaud Patard wrote: > > my only concern is that /proc/device-tree/model takes precedence over > > /proc/cpuinfo in any case with no fallback to the latter. So if any ARM SoC > > gets device-tree enabled by a backport it might potentially need a change to >

Re: Bug#680699: unblock: flash-kernel/3.1

2012-07-08 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Philipp Kern (07/07/2012): > @debian-boot: Is it ok to unblock flash-kernel at this point or should > that be done post-beta1? Based on Arnaud's answer, please unblock it. If anything breaks, we know whom to poke. Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Bug#680699: unblock: flash-kernel/3.1

2012-07-08 Thread Rtp
Philipp Kern writes: > Hi, > > On Sun, Jul 08, 2012 at 03:16:41AM +0200, Hector Oron wrote: >> Please unblock package flash-kernel >> >> Hello, >> >> flash-kernel/3.1 adds device tree support for Dreamplug device (used by >> freedombox). >> >> Dreamplug support has been backported into l

Re: Bug#680699: unblock: flash-kernel/3.1

2012-07-07 Thread Philipp Kern
Hi, On Sun, Jul 08, 2012 at 03:16:41AM +0200, Hector Oron wrote: > Please unblock package flash-kernel > > Hello, > > flash-kernel/3.1 adds device tree support for Dreamplug device (used by > freedombox). > > Dreamplug support has been backported into linux/3.2.21-1, which we expect > i