Bug#697619: Processed: found 697619 in 0.110
On Mon, 2013-04-22 at 21:36 +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
found 697619 0.110
Bug #697619 {Done: Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk} [initramfs-tools]
Many HID drivers not included in initramfs
Marked as found in versions initramfs-tools/0.110 and reopened.
What's the issue with the fix? If we need another upload for i-t for r0
then it'll need to be soon. :-|
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/1366747406.24885.9.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
Bug#697619: Processed: found 697619 in 0.110
* Adam D. Barratt [Tue Apr 23, 2013 at 09:03:26PM +0100]:
On Mon, 2013-04-22 at 21:36 +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
found 697619 0.110
Bug #697619 {Done: Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk} [initramfs-tools]
Many HID drivers not included in initramfs
Marked as found in versions initramfs-tools/0.110 and reopened.
What's the issue with the fix? If we need another upload for i-t for r0
then it'll need to be soon. :-|
We've 0.109.1 which fixes that in wheezy and unstable, shouldn't
this be enough? Is experimental's 0.110 of i-t an issue WRT to r0?
I'd push a 0.111 release to experimental immediately then.
regards,
-mika-
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Bug#697619: Processed: found 697619 in 0.110
On Tue, 2013-04-23 at 22:17 +0200, Michael Prokop wrote: * Adam D. Barratt [Tue Apr 23, 2013 at 09:03:26PM +0100]: What's the issue with the fix? If we need another upload for i-t for r0 then it'll need to be soon. :-| We've 0.109.1 which fixes that in wheezy and unstable, shouldn't this be enough? Is experimental's 0.110 of i-t an issue WRT to r0? I'd push a 0.111 release to experimental immediately then. Bah, I misread the versions and thought it was affecting the recent upload to sid; sorry for the noise. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1366748404.24885.16.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
Bug#697619: Processed: found 697619 in 0.110
On Tue, 2013-04-23 at 21:23 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 09:03:26PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: What's the issue with the fix? If we need another upload for i-t for r0 then it'll need to be soon. :-| The fix hasn't gone into a 'mainline' release yet, so this still affects experimental. Yeah, I should have checked the version more closely... *sigh* Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1366748643.24885.17.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
Bug#697619: Processed: found 697619 in 0.110
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 09:03:26PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Mon, 2013-04-22 at 21:36 +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
found 697619 0.110
Bug #697619 {Done: Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk} [initramfs-tools]
Many HID drivers not included in initramfs
Marked as found in versions initramfs-tools/0.110 and reopened.
What's the issue with the fix? If we need another upload for i-t for r0
then it'll need to be soon. :-|
The fix hasn't gone into a 'mainline' release yet, so this still
affects experimental.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
We get into the habit of living before acquiring the habit of thinking.
- Albert Camus
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130423202307.gx2...@decadent.org.uk
Bug#697619: Processed: found 697619 in 0.110
* Adam D. Barratt [Tue Apr 23, 2013 at 09:20:04PM +0100]: On Tue, 2013-04-23 at 22:17 +0200, Michael Prokop wrote: * Adam D. Barratt [Tue Apr 23, 2013 at 09:03:26PM +0100]: What's the issue with the fix? If we need another upload for i-t for r0 then it'll need to be soon. :-| We've 0.109.1 which fixes that in wheezy and unstable, shouldn't this be enough? Is experimental's 0.110 of i-t an issue WRT to r0? I'd push a 0.111 release to experimental immediately then. Bah, I misread the versions and thought it was affecting the recent upload to sid; sorry for the noise. No worries, I've just released and uploaded i-t v0.111 which includes the fixes which went into wheezy (thanks for that, Ben) to avoid further confusion. regards, -mika- signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#697619: Processed: found 697619 in 0.110
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 10:48:46PM +0200, Michael Prokop wrote: * Adam D. Barratt [Tue Apr 23, 2013 at 09:20:04PM +0100]: On Tue, 2013-04-23 at 22:17 +0200, Michael Prokop wrote: * Adam D. Barratt [Tue Apr 23, 2013 at 09:03:26PM +0100]: What's the issue with the fix? If we need another upload for i-t for r0 then it'll need to be soon. :-| We've 0.109.1 which fixes that in wheezy and unstable, shouldn't this be enough? Is experimental's 0.110 of i-t an issue WRT to r0? I'd push a 0.111 release to experimental immediately then. Bah, I misread the versions and thought it was affecting the recent upload to sid; sorry for the noise. No worries, I've just released and uploaded i-t v0.111 which includes the fixes which went into wheezy (thanks for that, Ben) to avoid further confusion. Thanks! If you have time, could I talk you into uploading an updated backport for squeeze-backports, as well, to address this issue and 689830? - Josh Triplett -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130423211159.GA6833@jtriplet-mobl1
