On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 03:31:03AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Fri, 2013-05-24 at 15:30 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
Alternatively, I'm pondering: if the main thrust of the hardlink
protection is to prevent attacks against system files, then it might
make more sense to change
Control: severity -1 wishlist
Control: found -1 3.8.13-1
On Fri, 2013-05-24 at 15:30 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
[...]
For now, on that system we have changed the default settings via /proc
but it's not a real solution for us and DSA don't want to do it
permanently.
It certainly sounds like
Processing control commands:
severity -1 wishlist
Bug #709625 [src:linux] protected_hardlinks is too broad - make it
per-filesystem instead?
Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'normal'
found -1 3.8.13-1
Bug #709625 [src:linux] protected_hardlinks is too broad - make it
per-filesystem instead?
Package: src:linux
Version: 3.2.41-2
Severity: normal
Hi,
I think that the new security feature to restrict hardlinks is a great
idea, but it is also causing me problems. In debian-cd, we rely on the
ability to make hardlinked copies of files from a debian mirror into
temporary disk trees. Since
4 matches
Mail list logo
