Bug#719547: linux: provide a PREEMPT_RT kernel image for non-x86 architectures

2013-08-13 Thread Bob Bib
Tue, 13 Aug 2013, 2:27 +02:00 from Ben Hutchings:
 If there is some platform where you think this would be particularly
 useful, please specify which.

AFAIK, ARM (armhf?) is currently a most prospective architecture;
the package name would be smth. like linux-image-x.y-n-rt-armmp.

 We're not going to double the number of kernel images by adding rt to
 everything.

In the initial bug report messag, I agreed with that:
  // Probably it's just better to wait until that patchset
  gets completely merged with the main kernel tree :)


Best wishes, Bob

Bug#719547: linux: provide a PREEMPT_RT kernel image for non-x86 architectures

2013-08-13 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Tue, 2013-08-13 at 21:33 +0400, Bob Bib wrote:
 Tue, 13 Aug 2013, 2:27 +02:00 from Ben Hutchings:
  If there is some platform where you think this would be particularly
  useful, please specify which.
 
 AFAIK, ARM (armhf?) is currently a most prospective architecture;
 the package name would be smth. like linux-image-x.y-n-rt-armmp.
 
  We're not going to double the number of kernel images by adding rt to
  everything.
 
 In the initial bug report messag, I agreed with that:
   // Probably it's just better to wait until that patchset
   gets completely merged with the main kernel tree :)

PREEMPT_RT is still a compile-time option and probably always will be.
So that won't reduce the number of binary packages required.

I'd be happy to add an (armhf, rt, armmp) configuration if the ARM
porters are also happy with doing this.  I believe the PREEMPT_RT patch
set is quite well tested and supported on ARM.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Experience is what causes a person to make new mistakes instead of old ones.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Bug#719547: linux: provide a PREEMPT_RT kernel image for non-x86 architectures

2013-08-12 Thread Bob Bib
Package: src:linux
Version: 3.10.5-1
Severity: wishlist

Dear Maintainer,

IMHO, Debian would benefit from having PREEMPT_RT realtime Linux kernel images
not only for i686  AMD64, but also for other architectures like ARM.

// Probably it's just better to wait until that patchset gets completely merged 
with the main kernel tree :)


-- Package-specific info:
** Version:
Linux version 3.9-1-amd64 (debian-kernel@lists.debian.org) (gcc version 4.7.3 
(Debian 4.7.3-5) ) #1 SMP Debian 3.9.8-1

-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.9-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash



Best wishes, Bob

Bug#719547: linux: provide a PREEMPT_RT kernel image for non-x86 architectures

2013-08-12 Thread Ben Hutchings
Control: tag -1 moreinfo

On Tue, 2013-08-13 at 04:05 +0400, Bob Bib wrote:
 Package: src:linux
 Version: 3.10.5-1
 Severity: wishlist
 
 Dear Maintainer,
 
 IMHO, Debian would benefit from having PREEMPT_RT realtime Linux kernel images
 not only for i686  AMD64, but also for other architectures like ARM.
 
 // Probably it's just better to wait until that patchset gets completely 
 merged with the main kernel tree :)

We're not going to double the number of kernel images by adding rt to
everything.

If there is some platform where you think this would be particularly
useful, please specify which.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Experience is what causes a person to make new mistakes instead of old ones.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Processed: Re: Bug#719547: linux: provide a PREEMPT_RT kernel image for non-x86 architectures

2013-08-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands:

 tag -1 moreinfo
Bug #719547 [src:linux] linux: provide a PREEMPT_RT kernel image for non-x86 
architectures
Added tag(s) moreinfo.

-- 
719547: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=719547
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.b719547.137635368310539.transcr...@bugs.debian.org