Dne 3.4.2017 v 22:20 Sam Ravnborg napsal(a):
> On Mon, Apr 03, 2017 at 03:25:10PM +0200, Michal Marek wrote:
>> On 2017-04-03 09:42, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
>>> Each Makefile knows it wants to see
>>> additional headers in the source tree, or objtree.
>>>
>>> I am guessing the right approach in a
Hi Sam,
2017-04-04 5:20 GMT+09:00 Sam Ravnborg :
> On Mon, Apr 03, 2017 at 03:25:10PM +0200, Michal Marek wrote:
>> On 2017-04-03 09:42, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
>> > Each Makefile knows it wants to see
>> > additional headers in the source tree, or objtree.
>> >
>> > I am
On Mon, Apr 03, 2017 at 03:25:10PM +0200, Michal Marek wrote:
> On 2017-04-03 09:42, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> > Each Makefile knows it wants to see
> > additional headers in the source tree, or objtree.
> >
> > I am guessing the right approach in a long run is,
> > we require -I to specify
On 2017-04-03 09:42, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> Each Makefile knows it wants to see
> additional headers in the source tree, or objtree.
>
> I am guessing the right approach in a long run is,
> we require -I to specify $(srctree) or $(objtree) explicitly.
>
> ccflags-y := -I$(srctree)/foo/bar/baz
+To Arnd
+To Michal
2017-03-19 6:58 GMT+09:00 Ben Hutchings :
> systemtap currently fails to build modules when the kernel source and
> object trees are separate.
>
> systemtap adds something like -I"/usr/share/systemtap/runtime" to
> EXTRA_CFLAGS, and addtree should not
systemtap currently fails to build modules when the kernel source and
object trees are separate.
systemtap adds something like -I"/usr/share/systemtap/runtime" to
EXTRA_CFLAGS, and addtree should not adjust this as it's specifying an
absolute directory. But since make has no understanding of
6 matches
Mail list logo