On Fri, 2019-10-25 at 10:22 +0200, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
> Ben Hutchings writes:
> > The code signing service logs every file it signs, along with a hash of
> > the detached signature, but I don't know where the logs are so I can't
> > comapre with that.
>
> I checked the audit log, but I don't
On Fri, 2019-10-25 at 11:21 +0200, Tomas Janousek wrote:
> Cool, thanks for reproducing the issue! Just one question: when you say
> production key, does that mean a hardware security module like Ben mentioned,
> or can you reproduce this with a fully software implementation?
The production key
Hi Ansgar,
On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 10:59:09AM +0200, Ansgar wrote:
> I tried running `sign-file` manually and can reproduce the truncated
> file with Debian's production key. I also tried signing the same key
> with a test key instead of the production key: then the signature is 256
> bytes
Tomas Janousek writes:
> On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 09:45:55AM +0200, Ansgar wrote:
>> Tomas Janousek suggested in https://bugs.debian.org/942881#41 that the
>> file might be truncated and two bytes missing. I think that might be
>> the problem, but with three bytes missing:
>>
>>
Ben Hutchings writes:
> The code signing service logs every file it signs, along with a hash of
> the detached signature, but I don't know where the logs are so I can't
> comapre with that.
I checked the audit log, but I don't think it will help much. It
currently records that:
- 2019-10-21
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 09:45:55AM +0200, Ansgar wrote:
> Tomas Janousek suggested in https://bugs.debian.org/942881#41 that the
> file might be truncated and two bytes missing. I think that might be
> the problem, but with three bytes missing:
>
> src:linux-signed-amd64/5.3.7+1 has for
Hi,
Ben Hutchings writes:
> You can also find the detached signatures in the source package,
> linux-signed-amd64. For this module, the signature is:
>
> debian/signatures/linux-image-5.3.0-1-amd64-unsigned/lib/modules/5.3.0-1-amd64/kernel/sound/pci/hda/snd-hda-codec-hdmi.ko.sig
Tomas Janousek
On Wed, 23 Oct 2019 17:24:22 +0200 Tomas Janousek wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 09:24:50AM +0200, Tomas Janousek wrote:
> > And there's something horribly wrong with the Debian build of modules, it
> > seems. I wonder what else is broken on this system because of a badly signed
>
Hi again,
On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 11:59:03PM +0200, Tomas Janousek wrote:
> There seems to be a workaround:
>
> options snd_hda_intel probe_mask=1
>
> I'm not getting errors with this and audio works. I have a feeling that HDMI
> audio will not work, however, because there's no "input: HDA
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 09:47:32PM +0300, Josh Triplett wrote:
> After upgrading to linux-image-5.3.0-1-amd64, I get messages like those
> seen in the log ("No response from codec, resetting bus" and "Unable to
> sync register"), and eventually a WARN. The mixer doesn't show the audio
>
Package: src:linux
Version: 5.3.7-1
Severity: normal
After upgrading to linux-image-5.3.0-1-amd64, I get messages like those
seen in the log ("No response from codec, resetting bus" and "Unable to
sync register"), and eventually a WARN. The mixer doesn't show the audio
device at all.
This didn't
11 matches
Mail list logo