On Mon, January 8, 2007 11:03 pm, Gordon Haverland said:
On Monday 08 January 2007 14:07, Mattia Dongili wrote:
On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 12:43:00PM -0700, Gordon Haverland
wrote: [...]
probably you missed `make clean mrproper` before building UML.
I've tried:
make-kpkg clean
make clean
On Thursday 04 January 2007 05:13, Mattia Dongili wrote:
On Wed, Jan 03, 2007 at 05:13:59PM -0700, Gordon Haverland
wrote:
Hello.
I've almost always compiled my own kernels, across a bunch of
things for quite a while (UN*X experience back to 1984, Linux
to 1997?). Some shortcomings of
On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 12:43:00PM -0700, Gordon Haverland wrote:
[...]
PATCH_THE_KERNEL=AUTO
make-kpkg --revision=newmain.2 --config=defconfig --arch=um --arch_in_name
kernel_image
Since I am not patching anything the PATH_THE_KERNEL=AUTO
environment variable setting really shouldn't do
On Monday 08 January 2007 14:07, Mattia Dongili wrote:
On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 12:43:00PM -0700, Gordon Haverland
wrote: [...]
probably you missed `make clean mrproper` before building UML.
I've tried:
make-kpkg clean
make clean
make mrproper
make clean mrproper
and all continue to die
On Wed, Jan 03, 2007 at 05:13:59PM -0700, Gordon Haverland wrote:
Hello.
I've almost always compiled my own kernels, across a bunch of
things for quite a while (UN*X experience back to 1984, Linux to
1997?). Some shortcomings of using chroot to isolate things has
lead me to wanting to
On Thursday 04 January 2007 05:13, Mattia Dongili wrote:
On Wed, Jan 03, 2007 at 05:13:59PM -0700, Gordon Haverland
wrote:
Hello.
I've almost always compiled my own kernels, across a bunch of
things for quite a while (UN*X experience back to 1984, Linux
to 1997?). Some shortcomings of
Hello.
I've almost always compiled my own kernels, across a bunch of
things for quite a while (UN*X experience back to 1984, Linux to
1997?). Some shortcomings of using chroot to isolate things has
lead me to wanting to try UML.
So, I did a little reading, and figured I should use the skas
7 matches
Mail list logo