On Thu, Aug 06, 2015 at 06:10:01PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
No, I want that history and a break in history will just make my life
harder. If you only want some of the branches you can get those.
Ok, so let's go for history.
Known bugs:
[...]
On the other hand, none of the known
On Mon, 2015-08-10 at 13:01 -0700, maximilian attems wrote:
On Thu, Aug 06, 2015 at 06:10:01PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
No, I want that history and a break in history will just make my life
harder. If you only want some of the branches you can get those.
Ok, so let's go for history.
On Wed, 2015-08-05 at 12:46 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
[...]
Here's where I am with the conversion:
https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/kernel/temp/
I've made many fixes to the scripts today, and pushed them and the
results to there. There's only one bug I'm aware of that I think is
necessary to
On Wed, 2015-08-05 at 16:01 -0700, maximilian attems wrote:
[...]
I started on a conversion that would include stitching in the upstream
history for the linux package, but that depends on how we store patches
in git and there isn't yet an obvious winner there (git-dpm vs git
-debcherry vs
We've been talking about this for at least 6 years, and it's well past
time to do it.
(I think most developers are already using git-svn, but that doesn't
properly handle tags and merges so I've never been able to make use of
it.)
I started on a conversion that would include stitching in the
Hello everyone,
On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 12:46:47PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
We've been talking about this for at least 6 years, and it's well past
time to do it.
thanks a lot Ben for pushing this.
(I think most developers are already using git-svn, but that doesn't
properly handle tags
6 matches
Mail list logo
