Hello,
BTW -- while we're on the topic of 2.6.32 and the next Debian release,
and 802.11, do you guys ship iw by default yet? If not I highly
encourage it. It should be shipped just as iwconfig is shipped. iw is
the replacement for iwconfig, it uses the new nl80211 and nl80211 is
used by all
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 8:39 PM, Paul Wise p...@debian.org wrote:
On Tue, 2010-03-02 at 04:44 +0200, Faidon Liambotis wrote:
Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
Can you guys upstream a package into Debian with a gitweb URL reference?
If I'm understanding the question correctly, yes. We have Vcs-$VCS
On Mon, 2010-03-01 at 10:47 -0500, John W. Linville wrote:
FWIW, I don't create the tarballs. Perhaps we could ask Johannes to
do something in his scripts that create them? Beyond that I don't
see much point in checking-in a ChangeLog.
It definitely shouldn't be checked into git, but rather
On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 01:43:46PM -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
I'd suggest that 'make dist' should include a ChangeLog file in the
tarball, generated with git2cl or git log or whatever. A NEWS file
summarising the user-visible changes in each version would also be a
good idea for
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 8:09 AM, Paul Wise p...@debian.org wrote:
On Mon, 2010-03-01 at 10:47 -0500, John W. Linville wrote:
FWIW, I don't create the tarballs. Perhaps we could ask Johannes to
do something in his scripts that create them? Beyond that I don't
see much point in checking-in a
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 1:50 PM, Kel Modderman k...@otaku42.de wrote:
On Tuesday 02 March 2010 04:13:25 Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 8:09 AM, Paul Wise p...@debian.org wrote:
On Mon, 2010-03-01 at 10:47 -0500, John W. Linville wrote:
FWIW, I don't create the tarballs.
On Tuesday 02 March 2010 04:13:25 Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 8:09 AM, Paul Wise p...@debian.org wrote:
On Mon, 2010-03-01 at 10:47 -0500, John W. Linville wrote:
FWIW, I don't create the tarballs. Perhaps we could ask Johannes to
do something in his scripts that
Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
Can you guys upstream a package into Debian with a gitweb URL reference?
If I'm understanding the question correctly, yes. We have Vcs-$VCS (i.e.
Vcs-Git) and Vcs-Browser pseudo-headers. Both are optional.
I agree with Kel here, git2cl et al are unimportant details.
On Tue, 2010-03-02 at 04:44 +0200, Faidon Liambotis wrote:
Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
Can you guys upstream a package into Debian with a gitweb URL reference?
If I'm understanding the question correctly, yes. We have Vcs-$VCS (i.e.
Vcs-Git) and Vcs-Browser pseudo-headers. Both are optional.
Adding debian-devel and debian-mentors.
As per Paul Wise' advice I'd like to request for help with the
crda/wireless-regdb package for Debian for the next release of Debian.
I am the upstream crda maintainer and John Linville is the upstream
wireless-regdb maintainer. Kel Modderman has already
Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
As per Paul Wise' advice I'd like to request for help with the
crda/wireless-regdb package for Debian for the next release of Debian.
I am the upstream crda maintainer and John Linville is the upstream
wireless-regdb maintainer. Kel Modderman has already done most work
On Sat, 2010-02-27 at 23:59 +0200, Faidon Liambotis wrote:
I'm a member of pkg-wpa-devel and I've been sponsoring Kel for almost 4
years. I have absolute trust in him and I've even offered to advocate
him to the NM process multiple times.
I'd definitely agree with your assessment here and
On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 09:19 -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
Upstream does not do the same. Ubuntu packages these two together
right now but it was because it made life easier for packaging.
John, do you guys package wireless-regdb and crda together on Fedora
land? Was this because of the
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 11:10 PM, Paul Wise p...@debian.org wrote:
On Fri, 2010-02-05 at 15:11 -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
And after reviewing this again, I conclude Kel already did all the
work :) So any mentors / DDs willing to take his package up?
I think its at:
dget -ux
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 09:19:06AM -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 11:10 PM, Paul Wise p...@debian.org wrote:
I don't really like that it merges the two packages. I don't think that
is appropriate unless upstream is going to do the same.
Upstream does not do the
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 10:14 AM, John W. Linville
linvi...@tuxdriver.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 09:19:06AM -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 11:10 PM, Paul Wise p...@debian.org wrote:
I don't really like that it merges the two packages. I don't think that
is
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 4:25 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez mcg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 6:03 AM, Kel Modderman k...@otaku42.de wrote:
On Thursday 04 February 2010 11:42:33 Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 6:10 PM, Paul Wise p...@debian.org wrote:
On Mon, 2010-02-01 at
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 12:09 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez mcg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 4:25 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez mcg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 6:03 AM, Kel Modderman k...@otaku42.de wrote:
On Thursday 04 February 2010 11:42:33 Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
On Mon, Feb
On Fri, 2010-02-05 at 15:11 -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
And after reviewing this again, I conclude Kel already did all the
work :) So any mentors / DDs willing to take his package up?
I think its at:
dget -ux http://sidux.net/kelmo/sidux/crap/crda/crda_1.1.1-1.dsc
Ok, here are my
On Thursday 04 February 2010 11:42:33 Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 6:10 PM, Paul Wise p...@debian.org wrote:
On Mon, 2010-02-01 at 09:58 -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
I can help with this only if no one else is up for it. I personally
however find building a key on
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 6:03 AM, Kel Modderman k...@otaku42.de wrote:
On Thursday 04 February 2010 11:42:33 Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 6:10 PM, Paul Wise p...@debian.org wrote:
On Mon, 2010-02-01 at 09:58 -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
I can help with this only if no
On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 04:25:53PM -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
Also, it seems that the REGDB_CHANGED stuff in wireless-regdb/Makefile does
not
work as expected - the sha1sum.txt file possibly contains the hash from an
old
db.txt
Yeah, John -- can you please run:
sha1sum
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 4:43 PM, John W. Linville linvi...@tuxdriver.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 04:25:53PM -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
Also, it seems that the REGDB_CHANGED stuff in wireless-regdb/Makefile
does not
work as expected - the sha1sum.txt file possibly contains the
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 6:10 PM, Paul Wise p...@debian.org wrote:
On Mon, 2010-02-01 at 09:58 -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
I can help with this only if no one else is up for it. I personally
however find building a key on the fly for each build pretty pointless
and would like to know if a
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 6:46 PM, Paul Wise p...@debian.org wrote:
On Fri, 2010-01-29 at 10:54 -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
Given the OpenSSL stuff in crda 1.1.1, I don't think there are any
technical roadblocks before crda/wireless-regdb can be uploaded to
Debian (once the packaging
On Mon, 2010-02-01 at 09:58 -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
I can help with this only if no one else is up for it. I personally
however find building a key on the fly for each build pretty pointless
and would like to know if a package would be acceptable upstream on
Debian if OpenSSL is used
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 6:57 PM, Paul Wise p...@debian.org wrote:
[Please keep me in CC for this thread]
There is a technical change coming in Debian that may mean one key for
the pkg-wpa folks will be more problematic; it is planned that
maintainer-built .debs are to be thrown away on upload
On Fri, 2010-01-29 at 10:54 -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
Exactly, this is already taken care of upstream with OpenSSL. The
default directory is /etc/wireless-regdb/pubkeys/
Excellent.
Patches for this are welcomed upstream on CRDA. Is this a requirement
for Debian to package CRDA?
No,
Hey folks,
I wanted to try to help Debian in ways in which I can with the new
regulatory infrastructure upstream on the Linux kernel. As of recent
(= 2.6.34) the old regulatory stuff has been deprecated and replaced
completely for CFG80211_INTERNAL_REGDB, the old regulatory framework
was also
On Friday 29 January 2010 04:10:04 Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
I asked Kel Modderman [3] about the packages and it seems he is really
busy with quite a few moves he has been doing and just lacks time to
get wireless-regdb and crda packaged into Debian. I am the upstream
CRDA maintainer and have
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 06:11:50AM +1000, Kel Modderman wrote:
There are potentially lots of people who could be building/uploading these
packages and having the same private key for all people to sign regulatory.bin
may not be feasible.
Generating a one time private key requires that
[Please keep me in CC for this thread]
There is a technical change coming in Debian that may mean one key for
the pkg-wpa folks will be more problematic; it is planned that
maintainer-built .debs are to be thrown away on upload (but still
required) and all packages rebuilt on the buildds. There
On Fri, 2010-01-29 at 10:57 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
* wireless-regdb could check at build time if the source database
has been modified and a new binary database been rebuilt
* If so
* generate a new temporary key at build time
33 matches
Mail list logo
