Re: Kernel BoF, 29th July

2009-07-30 Thread maximilian attems
On Thu, 30 Jul 2009, Max Vozeler wrote: > On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 10:51:04PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote: > > even more if it is loop-aes which show a long history of > > hostily of the module owner versus linux-2.6 upstream. > > That's not true. > > There are several reasons why loop-AES has

Re: Kernel BoF, 29th July

2009-07-29 Thread Max Vozeler
Maks, On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 10:51:04PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote: > even more if it is loop-aes which show a long history of > hostily of the module owner versus linux-2.6 upstream. That's not true. There are several reasons why loop-AES has not been merged upstream, and has very little

Re: Kernel BoF, 29th July

2009-07-29 Thread Frans Pop
On Wednesday 29 July 2009, Frans Pop wrote: > On Wednesday 29 July 2009, you wrote: > > > Just for the record, the following is NOT correct: > > > 10:09 otavio: only linux-modules-extra > > > 10:09 nothing d-i uses and nothing one should really have to > > > care. > > > > > > D-I uses the loop-ae

Re: Kernel BoF, 29th July

2009-07-29 Thread maximilian attems
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 10:50:58PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote: > On Wednesday 29 July 2009, maximilian attems wrote: > > > Are there logs of the two meetings? > > > > well the second meeting got shortcut by recent events, > > first meeting yes: > > http://charm.itp.tuwien.ac.at/~mattems/%23debian-kerne

Re: Kernel BoF, 29th July

2009-07-29 Thread Frans Pop
On Wednesday 29 July 2009, you wrote: > > Just for the record, the following is NOT correct: > > 10:09 otavio: only linux-modules-extra > > 10:09 nothing d-i uses and nothing one should really have to > > care. > > > > D-I uses the loop-aes modules (for encrypted partitioning) and that > > is exa

Re: Kernel BoF, 29th July

2009-07-29 Thread Frans Pop
On Wednesday 29 July 2009, maximilian attems wrote: > > Are there logs of the two meetings? > > well the second meeting got shortcut by recent events, > first meeting yes: > http://charm.itp.tuwien.ac.at/~mattems/%23debian-kernel.2009-07-25.log Thx. Just for the record, the following is NOT corre

Re: Kernel BoF, 29th July

2009-07-29 Thread maximilian attems
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 10:08:11PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote: > On Tuesday 28 July 2009, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > There will be a second kernel BoF/meeting tomorrow (29th July) at > > 16:00-18:00 local time (14:00-16:00 UTC). > > > > I would like to discuss a possible lenny-and-1/2 kernel release. Th

Re: Kernel BoF, 29th July

2009-07-29 Thread Frans Pop
On Tuesday 28 July 2009, Ben Hutchings wrote: > There will be a second kernel BoF/meeting tomorrow (29th July) at > 16:00-18:00 local time (14:00-16:00 UTC). > > I would like to discuss a possible lenny-and-1/2 kernel release. There > should be time to discuss several other issues. Are there logs

Kernel BoF, 29th July

2009-07-28 Thread Ben Hutchings
There will be a second kernel BoF/meeting tomorrow (29th July) at 16:00-18:00 local time (14:00-16:00 UTC). I would like to discuss a possible lenny-and-1/2 kernel release. There should be time to discuss several other issues. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Unix is many things to many people, but it's