Hi Adrian,
Sorry for not replying early, busy with preparing the updates.
On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 03:41:15AM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 09, 2023 at 10:15:59AM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> >...
> > Note that the last time the problem arised already earlier in
> > experimental
On 2023-09-09 08:15, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
Hi all,
...
I doupt anybody is sensibly using armel nowdays under bookworm, so my
proposed
course of action for unblock the bookworm-security update is:
...
FYI, An old, headless, raspberry pi (armel) with GPS and camera, on
Debian testing,
On Sat, Sep 09, 2023 at 10:15:59AM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
>...
> Note that the last time the problem arised already earlier in
> experimental and Ben workarounded it there with
> https://salsa.debian.org/kernel-team/linux/-/commit/9dfe6d33a4fd220394228b30cbbfdb3b444d36ec
> We probably
On Sun, Sep 10, 2023 at 05:13:52PM +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sat, 2023-09-09 at 11:13 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> > Hi Salvatore,
> >
> > On 09-09-2023 10:15, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> > > but should have been support for armel been
> > > dropped earlier and should we do it for trixie
On Sun, Sep 10, 2023 at 10:55:49AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Sat, 2023-09-09 at 11:42 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
>
> > The first one is the one with included size limitations, because those
> > load the kernel from a pre-defined flash partition, whose size can't be
> > easily changed by the
On Sat, Sep 09, 2023 at 12:43:20PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Sep 09, 2023 at 11:49:11AM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 09, 2023 at 10:15:59AM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> > >...
> > > - Relese the DSA without armel builds. This is not optimal and for
On Sat, 2023-09-09 at 11:13 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi Salvatore,
>
> On 09-09-2023 10:15, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> > but should have been support for armel been
> > dropped earlier and should we do it for trixie
>
> The kernel for armel went over some hardware limits before (I was
>
On Sat, 2023-09-09 at 11:42 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> The first one is the one with included size limitations, because those
> load the kernel from a pre-defined flash partition, whose size can't be
> easily changed by the user. This one is now overflowing for the second
> to last documented
On Sat, Sep 09, 2023 at 11:42:45AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Sat, Sep 09, 2023 at 11:13:56AM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> > If we're now reaching the final limit and if it was foreseeable that we
> > would reach that limit, then yes it would have made sense to drop armel
> > *before*
Hi,
On Sat, Sep 09, 2023 at 11:49:11AM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 09, 2023 at 10:15:59AM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> >...
> > - Relese the DSA without armel builds. This is not optimal and for the
> > point release
> > we need to have to have all builds, but this gives
Hi
On Sat, Sep 09, 2023 at 11:13:56AM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> If we're now reaching the final limit and if it was foreseeable that we
> would reach that limit, then yes it would have made sense to drop armel
> *before* the bookworm release, but alas. If the kernel team can't support
> the
Hi Salvatore,
On 09-09-2023 10:15, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
but should have been support for armel been
dropped earlier and should we do it for trixie
The kernel for armel went over some hardware limits before (I was
affected with my NAS, where I couldn't upgrade the kernel to bullseye as
On Sat, Sep 09, 2023 at 10:15:59AM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
>...
> - Relese the DSA without armel builds. This is not optimal and for the point
> release
> we need to have to have all builds, but this gives people who still are
> interested
> in this architecture to step up and
Hi all,
We have problem with the image size of armel builds in bookworm. There
is a pending bookworm-security linux update pending which is currently
blocked due to armel FTBFS due to the image size increase:
14 matches
Mail list logo
