Bug#795294: Remove debian-kernel-maint list
Package: lists.debian.org Severity: normal The debian-kernel-maint list has received nothing but spam and unanswered user questions since February 2007, shortly after its creation. In fact I wasn't aware of its existence until just now when I scrolled down the list of lists fror developers. Please remove it now. Ben. -- System Information: Debian Release: stretch/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: amd64 Kernel: Linux 4.1.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_GB.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
Re: debian-kernel-maint
dann frazier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Fri, Feb 09, 2007 at 10:47:58PM -0800, Jurij Smakov wrote: I believe the original idea was to create d-k-m for discussions and keep d-k as the address in maintainer field (and the primary contact address for the user requests). This appears to be the most straightforward way, as it requires no changes. That seems inherently conflicting because external people are most likely to start discussions on the maintainer address. And wouldn't every user have to subscribe to the other list? MfG Goswin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: debian-kernel-maint
On Fri, Feb 09, 2007 at 10:47:58PM -0800, Jurij Smakov wrote: I believe the original idea was to create d-k-m for discussions and keep d-k as the address in maintainer field (and the primary contact address for the user requests). This appears to be the most straightforward way, as it requires no changes. That seems inherently conflicting because external people are most likely to start discussions on the maintainer address. -- dann frazier -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
debian-kernel-maint
We've had debian-kernel-maint for a while now, but its never really been used. Should we keep it around? From what I understand, the reason for this list was to separate kernel discussions from the bug noise. Since debian-kernel is still listed as the maintainer, it seems to me that it makes more sense to move debbugs stuff away debian-kernel rather than move discussions to a new list (since many of them will begin w/ a message to the maintainer address). How about we ask the bugs.debian.org folks to redirect bug mail to debian-kernel-maint, and continue to use debian-kernel for discussions? -- dann frazier -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: debian-kernel-maint
On Fri, Feb 09, 2007 at 11:56:17AM -0700, dann frazier wrote: We've had debian-kernel-maint for a while now, but its never really been used. Should we keep it around? From what I understand, the reason for this list was to separate kernel discussions from the bug noise. Since debian-kernel is still listed as the maintainer, it seems to me that it makes more sense to move debbugs stuff away debian-kernel rather than move discussions to a new list (since many of them will begin w/ a message to the maintainer address). How about we ask the bugs.debian.org folks to redirect bug mail to debian-kernel-maint, and continue to use debian-kernel for discussions? I believe the original idea was to create d-k-m for discussions and keep d-k as the address in maintainer field (and the primary contact address for the user requests). This appears to be the most straightforward way, as it requires no changes. -- Jurij Smakov [EMAIL PROTECTED] Key: http://www.wooyd.org/pgpkey/ KeyID: C99E03CC -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
