Re: kernel 2.6.24 speakup

2008-03-28 Thread Samuel Thibault
maximilian attems, le Thu 27 Mar 2008 21:13:49 +0100, a écrit : On Thu, 27 Mar 2008, Samuel Thibault wrote: Erf, it looks like I've brought even more confusion with that braille patch. I'll try to be clearly sum up: - Vanilla 2.6.24 has keyboard/VT notifier support - both braille

Re: kernel 2.6.24 speakup

2008-03-27 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hello, maximilian attems, le Wed 26 Mar 2008 14:58:57 +0100, a écrit : On Tue, 25 Mar 2008, Samuel Thibault wrote: Ah, so since Lenny's d-i is supposed to use 2.6.24, speakup won't make it into it :/ as otavio said we gonna release with 2.6.24 for debian 2.6.24 stuff would have to go

Re: kernel 2.6.24 speakup

2008-03-27 Thread Samuel Thibault
maximilian attems, le Wed 26 Mar 2008 14:58:57 +0100, a écrit : anyway the -mm patch ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.25-rc5/2.6.25-rc5-mm1/broken-out/input-put-ledstate-in-the-keyboard-notifier.patch seems to apply fine for 2.6.25, but has none of the wanted

Re: kernel 2.6.24 speakup

2008-03-27 Thread maximilian attems
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 03:39:42PM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: maximilian attems, le Wed 26 Mar 2008 14:58:57 +0100, a écrit : anyway the -mm patch

Re: kernel 2.6.24 speakup

2008-03-27 Thread Samuel Thibault
maximilian attems, le Thu 27 Mar 2008 17:13:58 +0100, a écrit : On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 03:39:42PM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: maximilian attems, le Wed 26 Mar 2008 14:58:57 +0100, a écrit : anyway the -mm patch

Re: kernel 2.6.24 speakup

2008-03-27 Thread maximilian attems
On Thu, 27 Mar 2008, Samuel Thibault wrote: Erf, it looks like I've brought even more confusion with that braille patch. I'll try to be clearly sum up: - Vanilla 2.6.24 has keyboard/VT notifier support - both braille module and speakup need additional 4 exports to work ok understood,

Re: kernel 2.6.24 speakup

2008-03-26 Thread maximilian attems
On Tue, 25 Mar 2008, Samuel Thibault wrote: Ah, so since Lenny's d-i is supposed to use 2.6.24, speakup won't make it into it :/ as otavio said we gonna release with 2.6.24 for debian 2.6.24 stuff would have to go through the stable releases. 7 out of 9 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file

Re: kernel 2.6.24 speakup

2008-03-25 Thread Otavio Salvador
Samuel Thibault [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hello, Mario Lang, le Tue 25 Mar 2008 17:28:32 +0100, a écrit : Samuel Thibault [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: (speakup can now be compiled fully independently) linux-modules-extra-2.6 seems like the perfect place for speakup, now that it does not

Re: kernel 2.6.24 speakup

2008-03-25 Thread maximilian attems
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 03:06:58PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: Samuel Thibault [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hello, Mario Lang, le Tue 25 Mar 2008 17:28:32 +0100, a écrit : Samuel Thibault [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: (speakup can now be compiled fully independently)

Re: kernel 2.6.24 speakup

2008-03-25 Thread Samuel Thibault
Samuel Thibault, le Tue 25 Mar 2008 18:39:54 +, a écrit : Apply patches/kernel-integration-2.6.24-source.patch to the main kernel source to GPL-export 4 symbols, Note: by that, I mean to pick that patch into the regular linux-2.6 kernel. That patch is already in the -mm tree actually.

Re: kernel 2.6.24 speakup

2008-03-25 Thread Samuel Thibault
Frans Pop, le Tue 25 Mar 2008 19:29:56 +0100, a écrit : (Please don't CC me on list mail.) Then tell your mailer to use followup-to :) On Tuesday 25 March 2008, Samuel Thibault wrote: The idea is to compile the speakup module out-of-tree but still include it in d-i. Why would you want

Re: kernel 2.6.24 speakup

2008-03-25 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hello, maximilian attems, le Tue 25 Mar 2008 19:31:03 +0100, a écrit : On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 03:06:58PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: Samuel Thibault [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hello, Mario Lang, le Tue 25 Mar 2008 17:28:32 +0100, a écrit : Samuel Thibault [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: kernel 2.6.24 speakup

2008-03-25 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hello, Otavio Salvador, le Tue 25 Mar 2008 15:06:58 -0300, a écrit : Samuel Thibault [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Mario Lang, le Tue 25 Mar 2008 17:28:32 +0100, a écrit : Samuel Thibault [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: (speakup can now be compiled fully independently) linux-modules-extra-2.6

Re: kernel 2.6.24 speakup

2008-03-25 Thread maximilian attems
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 06:50:01PM +, Samuel Thibault wrote: Samuel Thibault, le Tue 25 Mar 2008 18:39:54 +, a écrit : Apply patches/kernel-integration-2.6.24-source.patch to the main kernel source to GPL-export 4 symbols, Note: by that, I mean to pick that patch into the regular

Re: kernel 2.6.24 speakup

2008-03-25 Thread Bastian Blank
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 06:39:54PM +, Samuel Thibault wrote: make $(cat allmodules.mk) SUBDIRS=$PWD -C /some/where/linux-whatever First: s/SUBDIRS/M/. Second: | $ make -C /usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.24-1-powerpc M=$(pwd) $(cat allmodule.mk) | make: Entering directory

Re: kernel 2.6.24 speakup

2008-03-25 Thread Samuel Thibault
maximilian attems, le Tue 25 Mar 2008 20:13:30 +0100, a écrit : On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 06:50:01PM +, Samuel Thibault wrote: Samuel Thibault, le Tue 25 Mar 2008 18:39:54 +, a écrit : Apply patches/kernel-integration-2.6.24-source.patch to the main kernel source to GPL-export 4

Re: kernel 2.6.24 speakup

2008-03-25 Thread Frans Pop
On Tuesday 25 March 2008, Samuel Thibault wrote: It is not part of the upstream kernel. OK. I misunderstood that. My apologies. Anyway, it still needs to be included in linux-2.6 and l-e-m before we can really discuss inclusion in the installer. Having it in l-m-e should not be a problem for

Re: kernel 2.6.24 speakup

2008-03-25 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hello, Bastian Blank, le Tue 25 Mar 2008 21:22:25 +0100, a écrit : On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 06:39:54PM +, Samuel Thibault wrote: make $(cat allmodules.mk) SUBDIRS=$PWD -C /some/where/linux-whatever First: s/SUBDIRS/M/. Oh, right. | $ make -C /usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.24-1-powerpc

Re: kernel 2.6.24 speakup

2008-03-25 Thread Samuel Thibault
Frans Pop, le Tue 25 Mar 2008 21:40:24 +0100, a écrit : On Tuesday 25 March 2008, Samuel Thibault wrote: It is not part of the upstream kernel. OK. I misunderstood that. My apologies. No problem. Anyway, it still needs to be included in linux-2.6 and l-e-m before we can really discuss

Re: kernel 2.6.24 speakup

2008-03-25 Thread Samuel Thibault
Frans Pop, le Tue 25 Mar 2008 20:44:03 +0100, a écrit : The idea is not to compile speakup built into the kernel, but just as a module, and then it doesn't need to be integrated to the kernel build system, Compiling it into the kernel is not what I'm talking about. It definitely should

Re: kernel 2.6.24 speakup

2008-03-25 Thread maximilian attems
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 07:43:47PM +, Samuel Thibault wrote: maximilian attems, le Tue 25 Mar 2008 20:13:30 +0100, a écrit : once it is in next in next? next is the linux tree of things that are ready for the next merge window aka 2.6.26 now. 2.6.24 window is closed anyway.

Re: kernel 2.6.24 speakup

2008-03-25 Thread Samuel Thibault
maximilian attems, le Tue 25 Mar 2008 23:27:14 +0100, a écrit : On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 07:43:47PM +, Samuel Thibault wrote: maximilian attems, le Tue 25 Mar 2008 20:13:30 +0100, a écrit : once it is in next in next? next is the linux tree of things that are ready for the

Re: kernel 2.6.24 speakup

2008-03-25 Thread Otavio Salvador
Samuel Thibault [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: 2.6.24 window is closed anyway. You mean the upstream or the Debian? debian Ah, so since Lenny's d-i is supposed to use 2.6.24, speakup won't make it into it :/ Beta2 is probably going to be released with 2.6.24 but I guess lenny will still