This change is likely to be included in 2.6.32.y and, by default, in our
next stable point release. As Linus says, this means that unprivileged
accounts won't be able to run iotop, but this is probably correct
behaviour.
It appears that older versions of iotop do not report this error in a
On Wed, 2011-12-14 at 02:12 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
This change is likely to be included in 2.6.32.y and, by default, in our
next stable point release. As Linus says, this means that unprivileged
accounts won't be able to run iotop, but this is probably correct
behaviour.
Thanks for the
On Wed, 2011-12-14 at 11:11 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
On Wed, 2011-12-14 at 02:12 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
This change is likely to be included in 2.6.32.y and, by default, in our
next stable point release. As Linus says, this means that unprivileged
accounts won't be able to run iotop,
On Wed, 2011-12-14 at 04:32 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
Please do.
Proposed in #652015
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
4 matches
Mail list logo