Processed: 2.6.8-16 still non-functional

2005-05-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reopen 308639 Bug#308639: kernel-build vs. kernel-headers splitted broken, headers unuseable Bug reopened, originator not changed. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Bug#308639: 2.6.8-16 still non-functional

2005-05-22 Thread Eduard Bloch
reopen 308639 thanks #include hallo.h * Debian Bug Tracking System [Thu, May 19 2005, 08:48:09PM]: * Fixed kernel-build/kernel-headers so that kernel-build now include the symlinks to all kernel-headers stuff. (closes: #308639) (Sven Luther, Simon Horman) * Add Module.symvers

Bug#310213: kernel-build-2.6.8-powerpc: should conflict with at least kernel-image-2.6.8-powerpc 2.6.8-4

2005-05-22 Thread Matijs van Zuijlen
Package: kernel-build-2.6.8-powerpc Version: 2.6.8-12 Severity: normal Something appears to have changed in the division of files between the kernel-image and the kernel-build packages: My kernel is held at kernel-image-2.6.8-powerpc version 2.6.8-4, mainly since I've seen no need to upgrade it

Processing of kernel-image-2.6.11-alpha_2.6.11-1_alpha.changes

2005-05-22 Thread Archive Administrator
kernel-image-2.6.11-alpha_2.6.11-1_alpha.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: kernel-image-2.6.11-alpha_2.6.11-1.dsc kernel-image-2.6.11-alpha_2.6.11-1.tar.gz kernel-headers-2.6.11-1_2.6.11-1_alpha.deb kernel-headers-2.6.11-1-smp_2.6.11-1_alpha.deb

Bug#310243: kernel-image-2.6.8-powerpc: xfs data corruption

2005-05-22 Thread Luis Mondesi
Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-powerpc Version: 2.6.8-12 Severity: normal When using rsync to copy data from a Macintosh running Mac OS X to one running Debian Sarge on an XFS drive, the system reports XFS data corruption. The following is a collection of all the information i can collect from the

kernel-image-2.6.11-alpha_2.6.11-1_alpha.changes is NEW

2005-05-22 Thread Debian Installer
(new) kernel-headers-2.6.11-1-generic_2.6.11-1_alpha.deb optional devel Linux kernel headers 2.6.11 on Alpha This package provides kernel header files for version 2.6.11 on the Alpha architecture, for sites that want the latest kernel headers. Please read

Bug#310244: kernel-source-2.6.11: Kernel BUG at kernel/timer.c:473!

2005-05-22 Thread Rick Bolen
Package: kernel-source-2.6.11 Version: 2.6.11-3 Severity: critical Justification: breaks the whole system I've been experiencing OOPs in swapper throughout all 2.6.x kernels I've tried. This latest bug may be due to the same root cause. As best as I have the screen data currently: Entered

Re: RFC: New uniform packaging scheme

2005-05-22 Thread Sven Luther
On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 02:04:33PM -0400, Jurij Smakov wrote: kernel-headers-$(version)-$(abiname)-$(subarch) A common headers package for an architecture with subarches. Same purpose and contents as the one above. To be absolutely sure that there will be no namespace collision between

Fixed in NMU of initrd-tools 0.1.80

2005-05-22 Thread Sven Luther
tag 264839 + fixed tag 269726 + fixed tag 283919 + fixed tag 284763 + fixed tag 299103 + fixed tag 305145 + fixed tag 307471 + fixed quit This message was generated automatically in response to a non-maintainer upload. The .changes file follows. -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1

Processed: Fixed in NMU of initrd-tools 0.1.80

2005-05-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 264839 + fixed Bug#264839: initrd-tools: mkinitrd should include keyboard modules (i8042, atkbd) in case an early fsck interaction is needed Tags were: pending Tags added: fixed tag 269726 + fixed Bug#269726: Software RAID: if kernel compiled

Re: RFC: New uniform packaging scheme

2005-05-22 Thread Bastian Blank
On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 02:04:33PM -0400, Jurij Smakov wrote: As you might know, we are planning a transition to the common kernel source, which is expected to build all the kernel-related packages, eliminating the problems with arches getting out of sync, etc. Are the problems with 200

Processing of initrd-tools_0.1.80_powerpc.changes

2005-05-22 Thread Archive Administrator
initrd-tools_0.1.80_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: initrd-tools_0.1.80.dsc initrd-tools_0.1.80.tar.gz initrd-tools_0.1.80_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of

Bug#80878: She will pray you to stop.

2005-05-22 Thread Rosalind
Things people need for feeling better. http://ZFUxtzOIhmh.ei7.net/rx/sevy/stamp.html Rosalind

Bug#100421: Absolutely nothing to regret.

2005-05-22 Thread Dewey
Actually she takes much more time to have pleaseure. http://BKuslRDzrssp.ik4.net/rx/sevy/vehicle.php Dewey

Bug#80878: Actually she takes much more time to have pleaseure.

2005-05-22 Thread Edwina
Much more better than usual, believe me. http://KIXnzuecSCXfqubq.yi4.net/rx/sevy/parsley.htm Edwina

Bug#100421: Why shouldn't you be at your best?

2005-05-22 Thread Burton
Things people need for feeling better. http://VTWcwOHDfaks.t6i.net/p/sevy/wa.html Burton

Bug#303403: initrd-tools: More details about your system

2005-05-22 Thread Leonardo Serra
Package: initrd-tools Version: 0.1.79 Followup-For: Bug #303403 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, Can you send the file /etc/fstab and /etc/crypttab? Perhaps, this helps to solve the problem. thanks leoserra - -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers

Bug#310316: initrd-tools

2005-05-22 Thread Heldt Chrisitian
Package: initrd-tools Version: 0.1.80 just installed fresh sarge netinstall (only base system/packages with standard 2.6.8 kernel) after upgrading to sid initrd-tools is unable to find bin/root output at bootup initrd-tools: 0.1.80 /sbin/init: 360: cannot open bin/root: No such file after i

Processed: Tagging confirmed, setting severity to grave.

2005-05-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 310316 grave Bug#310316: initrd-tools Severity set to `grave'. tags 310316 confirmed Bug#310316: initrd-tools There were no tags set. Tags added: confirmed thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian

Bug#310316: Tagging confirmed, setting severity to grave.

2005-05-22 Thread Jurij Smakov
severity 310316 grave tags 310316 confirmed thanks Hi, I see that too and bumping the severity to RC, as it makes system unbootable. Will try to figure out what's wrong. Best regards, Jurij Smakov[EMAIL PROTECTED] Key: http://www.wooyd.org/pgpkey/

Processed: Patch for the initrd-tools problem

2005-05-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 310316 patch Bug#310316: initrd-tools Tags were: sid confirmed Tags added: patch thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To

Processed: tagging 310316

2005-05-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 tags 310316 sid Bug#310316: initrd-tools Tags were: confirmed Tags added: sid End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug

Bug#310316: Patch for the initrd-tools problem

2005-05-22 Thread Jurij Smakov
tags 310316 patch thanks Hi, Attached patch fixes the situation and makes my machine boot again. It looks like the value of zero for rootdev (which is extracted from /proc/sys/kernel/real-root-dev) is a valid one, contrary to the assertion in the init code of initrd-tools 0.1.80. This is the

Bug#309841: marked as done (kernel-headers-2.6.11-1-k7 symlinks)

2005-05-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 22 May 2005 23:49:52 -0400 (EDT) with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Not a bug, closing has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Re: RFC: New uniform packaging scheme

2005-05-22 Thread Jurij Smakov
Hi Bastian, On Sun, 22 May 2005, Bastian Blank wrote: On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 02:04:33PM -0400, Jurij Smakov wrote: Are the problems with 200 binary packages really fixed? If you want to fix the problems, you have to integrate the udeb build process which produces currently something about