Le Sat, 30 Apr 2011 18:34:15 +0700,
Sergei Stolyarov sergei.stolya...@regolit.com a écrit :
Please report whether this bug is fixed in Debian kernel version
2.6.32-31 (as included in Debian 6.0.1).
I'm using Samsung N150, problem still exists: sometimes system wake up
correctly, sometimes
Hello.
2011/5/3 Frédéric Boiteux fboit...@calistel.com:
Perhaps you're hit by same bug as me, see Debian bug #622259, and
suggested patch.If you can test it, please report if it fixes your
problem.
Do you mean removing patch
Hi,
The maschine has 12G of RAM. For dom0 I tried several configurations -
4G with balloning enabled, at least 1G statically assigned. DomUs have
different memory settings.
xm info | grep mem:
total_memory : 12224
free_memory: 1589
node_to_memory : node0:1077
Subject: No backport available for squeeze for package firmware-bnx2
Package: firmware-bnx2
Severity: wishlist
It would be nice if the latest firmware-bnx (0.29) could be migrated to
squeeze backports as well as the current version 0.28 doesn't seem to
support the kernel 2.6.38 that is available
Your message dated Tue, 3 May 2011 10:49:22 +0200
with message-id 20110503104922.d2e04ef5.li...@wansing-online.de
and subject line Re: d-i loads ide_generic but doesn't enable it in installed
system
has caused the Debian Bug report #571035,
regarding Kernel freezes at boot
to be marked as done.
Le Tue, 3 May 2011 14:50:32 +0700,
Sergei Stolyarov sergei.stolya...@regolit.com a écrit :
Hello.
2011/5/3 Frédéric Boiteux fboit...@calistel.com:
Perhaps you're hit by same bug as me, see Debian bug #622259, and
suggested patch.If you can test it, please report if it fixes your
2011/5/3 Frédéric Boiteux fboit...@calistel.com:
Yes, I mean reverting this patch. Are you sure it isn't applied in
linux-2.6_2.6.32-33 ?? I didn't read anything about this. Be careful,
it isn't a Debian patch, but a upstream patch coming with a stable
upstream release, in 2.6.32.28. I'm
Le Tue, 3 May 2011 17:11:48 +0700,
Sergei Stolyarov sergei.stolya...@regolit.com a écrit :
2011/5/3 Frédéric Boiteux fboit...@calistel.com:
Yes, I mean reverting this patch. Are you sure it isn't applied in
linux-2.6_2.6.32-33 ?? I didn't read anything about this. Be
careful, it isn't a
Martin Teufel wrote:
*g* - yes, I know that drm_kms_helper.poll=0 != drm.edid_strict=0.
I temporarily removed drm_kms_helper.poll=0 and added drm.edid_strict=0
to the linux kernel parameters (replaced it).
Hm, I will try it a second time and see what happens (but don't think it
will change
Hi together,
does someone know if this patch has been applied already to
linux-image-2.6.38-bpo.2-amd64 (2.6.38-3~bpo60+1)?
I installed this image yesterday and had the idea to test the
drm.edid_strict=0 parameter on it today. - It works like a charm. ;)
Dunno why my patch didn't work... (But I
linux-2.6_2.6.32-34_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-2.6_2.6.32-34.dsc
linux-2.6_2.6.32-34.diff.gz
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Probably you are the uploader of the following file(s) in
the Debian upload queue directory:
linux-2.6_2.6.32-34.diff.gz
linux-2.6_2.6.32-34.dsc
This looks like an upload, but a .changes file is missing, so the job
cannot be processed.
If no .changes file arrives within 23:29:32, the files
Reject Reasons:
source only uploads are not supported.
Notes:
Mapping stable to proposed-updates.
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
linux-2.6_2.6.32-34_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-2.6_2.6.32-34.dsc
linux-2.6_2.6.32-34.diff.gz
linux-doc-2.6.32_2.6.32-34_all.deb
linux-manual-2.6.32_2.6.32-34_all.deb
linux-patch-debian-2.6.32_2.6.32-34_all.deb
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.38-3
Severity: normal
File: acer-wmi
Tags: patch
I'm on an Acer Aspire One 721-3574.
The symptom was that I couldn't enable wireless with any of the usual tricks.
After doing a bit of research and (days) of playing, I finally figured out that
for whatever reason,
The acer-wmi documentation also suggests to blacklist acer-wmi on all
Aspire One laptops.
http://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/laptops/acer-wmi.txt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.39~rc5-1~experimental.1
Severity: normal
Tags: experimental
The driver for my other laptops broadcom BCM4313 seems to be missing.
Comparing the config files:
/boot/config-2.6.38-2-686:CONFIG_BRCM80211=m
/boot/config-2.6.38-2-686:CONFIG_BRCM80211_PCI=y
Current status:
Already included in 2.6.32-34:
3w-sas: Backported from 2.6.33 in 2.6.32-6
ahci: Cherry-picked support for Intel Cougar Point in 2.6.32.12, 2.6.32-12
ata_generic: add support for Intel IDE-R
(60039a5295b3d82a48fe132c699987d2e1408675)
ata_piix: Cherry-picked support for Intel
On Tue, 2011-05-03 at 20:00 -0500, Zachary Buhman wrote:
The acer-wmi documentation also suggests to blacklist acer-wmi on all
Aspire One laptops.
http://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/laptops/acer-wmi.txt
No, it says that it *is* blacklisted - which is true for some specific
Aspire One
On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 03:23 +0200, Erich Schubert wrote:
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.39~rc5-1~experimental.1
Severity: normal
Tags: experimental
The driver for my other laptops broadcom BCM4313 seems to be missing.
Comparing the config files:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
tags 625510 + pending
Bug #625510 [linux-2.6] Broadcom 802.11 driver missing from 2.6.39-rc[45]
Added tag(s) pending.
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please
Did the driver work on this hardware in earlier kernel versions?
Ben.
Yes, it worked in 2.6.32; I forgot to mention that.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 02:38 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
No, it says that it *is* blacklisted - which is true for some specific
Aspire One models.
I seems like most (if not all) distributions are treating it more like a
suggestion.
However, the code also has specific support for many
other
On Tue, 2011-05-03 at 22:09 -0500, Zachary Buhman wrote:
On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 02:38 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
No, it says that it *is* blacklisted - which is true for some specific
Aspire One models.
I seems like most (if not all) distributions are treating it more like a
suggestion.
24 matches
Mail list logo
