rleigh's patch resolves a systemd boot problem for me, so if this could
be uploaded soon, that'd be great.
--
Tollef Fog Heen
UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe.
On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 04:20 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
Indeed. That statement is dated 2009 and the driver has moved on.
I apologize; I assumed the documentation to be current and accurate.
No. You only have the evidence of your own model.
Ben.
You're correct. If the acer_wmi module isn't
On Mon, 2011-05-02 at 11:57 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Sun, 2011-05-01 at 16:51 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Sun, 2011-05-01 at 12:33 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Sat, 2011-04-30 at 17:34 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
Ian, should we apply the backport from
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
tags 613634 + pending
Bug #613634 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64: Using pvcreate on a
multipathed iscsi device produces a kernel bug
Bug #610812 [linux-2.6]
Did the driver work on this hardware in earlier kernel versions?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110504131549.gb1...@gpm.stappers.nl
Package: nfs-common
Version: 1:1.2.3-2
Severity: normal
rpcinfo: can't contact portmapper: rpcinfo: RPC: Authentication error; why =
Client credential too weak
The package bug script /usr/share/bug/nfs-common/script exited with an error
status (return code = 256). Do you still want to file a
Package: nfs-common
Version: 1:1.2.3-2
Severity: important
rpcinfo: can't contact portmapper: rpcinfo: RPC: Authentication error; why =
Client credential too weak
The package bug script /usr/share/bug/nfs-common/script exited with an error
status (return code = 256). Do you still want to file a
Package: nfs-common
Version: 1:1.2.3-2
Severity: normal
Please select tags: (one at a time) [none]
Gathering additional data, this may take a while...
rpcinfo: can't contact portmapper: rpcinfo: RPC: Authentication error; why =
Client credential too weak
The package bug script
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
forcemerge 621027 625600
Bug#621027: Invalid shell option in start-statd
Bug#625600: bashism in /usr/sbin/start-statd
Forcibly Merged 621027 625600.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
621027:
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.39~rc5-1~experimental.1
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
Please consider enabling CONFIG_RTL8192CU (Realtek RTL8192CU/RTL8188CU
USB Wireless Network Adapter) as a module, for support of Realtek
RTL8188CE-VAU, RTL8188CUS and RTL8192CU USB 802.11n wireless LAN
chipsets.
This
Package: firmware-realtek
Version: 0.29
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Hi,
Please consider including firmware used by the rtl8192cu driver (added
at Linux 2.6.39-rc1) for support of USB wireless LAN devices containing
RTL8188CE-VAU, RTL8188CUS or RTL8192CU chipsets.
The firmware file
On 05/04/2011 03:44 PM, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
Please select tags: (one at a time) [none]
Gathering additional data, this may take a while...
rpcinfo: can't contact portmapper: rpcinfo: RPC: Authentication error; why =
Client credential too weak
The package bug script
Your message dated Wed, 04 May 2011 20:07:36 +
with message-id e1qhimc-0002tw...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#613634: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.32-34
has caused the Debian Bug report #613634,
regarding base: After removing lvm snapshot got kernel BUG at
Your message dated Wed, 04 May 2011 20:07:36 +
with message-id e1qhimc-0002tw...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#613634: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.32-34
has caused the Debian Bug report #613634,
regarding xen-linux-system-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64: lvm causes kernel panic - kernel
BUG at
Your message dated Wed, 04 May 2011 20:07:36 +
with message-id e1qhimc-0002tz...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#614400: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.32-34
has caused the Debian Bug report #614400,
regarding base: After removing lvm snapshot got kernel BUG at
Your message dated Wed, 04 May 2011 20:07:36 +
with message-id e1qhimc-0002u3...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#617508: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.32-34
has caused the Debian Bug report #617508,
regarding linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: File permissions wrong on NFS4 mounts,
but OK after
Your message dated Wed, 04 May 2011 20:07:36 +
with message-id e1qhimc-0002ub...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#621072: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.32-34
has caused the Debian Bug report #621072,
regarding linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: 2.6.32-33 failes to boot as PV domU on Xen
to be marked
Your message dated Wed, 04 May 2011 20:07:36 +
with message-id e1qhimc-0002tz...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#614400: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.32-34
has caused the Debian Bug report #614400,
regarding xen-linux-system-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64: lvm causes kernel panic - kernel
BUG at
Your message dated Wed, 04 May 2011 20:07:36 +
with message-id e1qhimc-0002ub...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#621072: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.32-34
has caused the Debian Bug report #621072,
regarding 2.6.32-33 Xen amd64 kernel fails to boot as Xen guest
to be marked as done.
This
Your message dated Wed, 04 May 2011 20:07:36 +
with message-id e1qhimc-0002uf...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#622779: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.32-34
has caused the Debian Bug report #622779,
regarding sparc config missing SERIAL_8250{,_PCI}
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Wed, 04 May 2011 20:07:36 +
with message-id e1qhimc-0002uo...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#624268: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.32-34
has caused the Debian Bug report #624268,
regarding [squeeze] include important changes from 2.6.32.39
to be marked as done.
This means
Rik Theys wrote:
On 04/15/2011 05:49 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
Please consider adding this patch to a ((old)stable) kernel update.
I don't think this is sufficiently critical for an oldstable update.
For stable, yes, we'll consider it once it's accepted upstream. Please
let us know when
Notes:
Mapping stable to proposed-updates.
Accepted:
firmware-linux-free_2.6.32-34_all.deb
to main/l/linux-2.6/firmware-linux-free_2.6.32-34_all.deb
linux-2.6_2.6.32-34.diff.gz
to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_2.6.32-34.diff.gz
linux-2.6_2.6.32-34.dsc
to
Here are some outstanding bugs/tasks regarding the ARM kernels:
#604013 base: ls -al on armel inside loopback mounted ISO image failes with
-1 ENOMEM
Nobody has been able to reproduce and the submitter doesn't respond.
Maybe ping the submitter again, close if no reply.
#622325
* Antonios Galanopoulos an...@goto10.org [2011-04-27 11:50]:
I am not sure what the differences are. I have successfully booted it
with foonas (http://foonas.org) via tftp and there it appears as a
linkstation Pro in the dmesg logs. Same with debian but the Sata
drives are not recognised.
And
On Sat, 30 Apr 2011, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Sun, 2011-05-01 at 01:52 +0530, Faheem Mitha wrote:
Yes, I saw that when I checked your svn repos. You forgot (or
intentionally omitted, but if so, said nothing) to add the bit about the
linux-headers-common to 4.2. See the relevant portion of
On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 15:15 +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
Did the driver work on this hardware in earlier kernel versions?
Yes, it worked in 2.6.32.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 10:14:36PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
Rik Theys wrote:
On 04/15/2011 05:49 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
Please consider adding this patch to a ((old)stable) kernel update.
I don't think this is sufficiently critical for an oldstable update.
For stable, yes,
2011/5/3 Frédéric Boiteux fboit...@calistel.com:
time nice env DEBFULLNAME=Your Name DEBEMAIL=Your e-mail address \
KBUILD_PKG_ROOTCMD=fakeroot -u fakeroot make -j 2
KDEB_PKGVERSION=$kvers-$krel KERNELRELEASE=$kvers$ksuff deb-pkg
wait... quite a long time, install the generated .deb , boot
Le Thu, 5 May 2011 10:02:17 +0700,
Sergei Stolyarov sergei.stolya...@regolit.com a écrit :
Thank you for detailed description, have created kernel package,
installed, still not working: reboot instead of resume. The only
working kernel package version is 2.6.32-29. So looks like reverting
Ben
Max
Julien
Kibi
Sven
I''m getting a segfault with Bug listed in dmesg, but different after
today's upgrade than it was yesterday.
I'm very happy to wait till tomorrow for a possible fix to be uploaded.
I'm also very happy to file a bug if anyone wants to look at my old intel i865
31 matches
Mail list logo
