Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
reassign 625820 linux-2.6
Bug #625820 [initscripts] Please let the user know when fsck'ing while booting
- machine looks dead
Bug reassigned from package 'initscripts' to 'linux-2.6'.
Bug No longer marked as found in versions
Package: linux-image
Version: 2.6.38-8-amd64
Severity: critical
While running stock Debian's sid linux 2.6.38-8-amd64 kernel I'm getting random
fails on SATA devices.
I have a RAID5 system with 5 disks and 3 of them showed the same exact failure,
one each 48 hours.
On reboot, the devices work
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
reassign 625922 linux-2.6 2.6.38-8-amd64
Bug #625922 [linux-image] SATA devices get reset without real hardware failure
Warning: Unknown package 'linux-image'
Bug reassigned from package 'linux-image' to 'linux-2.6'.
Bug No longer marked as found
I've hit this bug from a different scenario - I have one SATA disk and
one external USB disk in a root on RAID1+LVM setup. During boot it
seems the USB device often doesn't settle before the md device gets to
being assembled, with the net result that it boots degraded, with the
USB device missing.
This is still broken in the latest versions. Switching to rpcbind does
NOT make any difference.
--
Mike Ricketts m...@earth.li
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
reassign 625922 linux-2.6
Bug #625922 [linux-2.6] SATA devices get reset without real hardware failure
Ignoring request to reassign bug #625922 to the same package
severity 625922 important
Bug #625922 [linux-2.6] SATA devices get reset without
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.38-2
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
As per subject, the orinoco_pci module is missing from 2.6.38 kernel images, so
my router
can no longer connect to the network.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers
On 05/07/2011 12:15 PM, Mike Ricketts wrote:
This is still broken in the latest versions. Switching to rpcbind does
NOT make any difference.
You are not using IPv6 and the suggestion of another user to add IPv6
addresses to /etc/hosts did not solve the issue?
You are using NFS with Kerberos
On Sat, 7 May 2011, Luk Claes wrote:
You are not using IPv6 and the suggestion of another user to add IPv6
addresses to /etc/hosts did not solve the issue?
I am not using IPv6, but I do already have the IPv6 addresses suggested in
/etc/hosts (I did not add them, they were already there)
Hi Mike,
On Sat, May 07, 2011 at 11:31:07AM +0100, Mike wrote:
As per subject, the orinoco_pci module is missing from 2.6.38 kernel
images, so my router can no longer connect to the network.
Prism 2/2.5/3 support in the orinoco driver (HERMES_PRISM) is disabled
by default as of Linux 2.6.35
found 2.6.38-4
--
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. ,= ,-_-. =.
b...@iguanasuicide.net ((_/)o o(\_))
ICQ: 514984 YM/AIM: DaTwinkDaddy `-'(. .)`-'
http://iguanasuicide.net/\_/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Fri, May 06, 2011 at 11:57:47AM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-mc13xxx.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-mc13xxx.c
index c5ac037..a1a278b 100644
--- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-mc13xxx.c
+++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-mc13xxx.c
@@ -349,11 +349,15 @@ static int __devinit
Hi Ben,
Sorry, probably I missed the note about dropping Vserver.
It seemed to be in wide use and under active development.
Pretty disappointing for the Vserver folks, I would guess.
Of course I can give lxc a try, but I am a little bit
concerned that it might get dropped, too, as soon as the
Your message dated Sat, 07 May 2011 23:40:19 +0100
with message-id 1304808019.3203.149.camel@localhost
and subject line Re: Bug#625953: linux-2.6: orinoco_pci module is no longer
present
has caused the Debian Bug report #625953,
regarding linux-2.6: orinoco_pci module is no longer present
to be
On Sat, 2011-05-07 at 23:59 +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote:
Hi Ben,
Sorry, probably I missed the note about dropping Vserver.
It seemed to be in wide use and under active development.
Pretty disappointing for the Vserver folks, I would guess.
Of course I can give lxc a try, but I am a little
Your message dated Sat, 7 May 2011 23:49:16 +0100
with message-id 20110507224916.GA22261@enorme.TCLDOMAIN.OFFICE
and subject line Re: Bug#604013: base: ls -al on armel inside loopback
mounted ISO image failes with -1 ENOMEM
has caused the Debian Bug report #604013,
regarding base: ls -al on armel
Hi,
2011/5/5 Arnaud Patard arnaud.pat...@rtp-net.org:
Martin Michlmayr t...@cyrius.com writes:
Here are some outstanding bugs/tasks regarding the ARM kernels:
#604013 base: ls -al on armel inside loopback mounted ISO image failes
with -1 ENOMEM
Nobody has been able to reproduce and the
Hello,
Here is a proposed patch against trunk for fixing this bug.
Patch was written initial by Arnaud Patard, later changed
by Uwe Kleine-König.
Best regards
Index: debian/patches/bugfix/arm/rtc_mutex_lockup.patch
===
---
On Sun, 2011-05-08 at 02:14 +0200, Hector Oron wrote:
Hi,
2011/5/5 Arnaud Patard arnaud.pat...@rtp-net.org:
[...]
hmm... I didn't notice this bug. The ARM options are enabled by default
like the other options. I don't know if it can have some side effects at
run time. I guess it should
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.38-3
Severity: normal
This is a bug in the kernel itself, there have been a few patches to the
kernel, but it seems at least one patch is not in the vanilla kernel. Some
other distributions are including this patch. See
Hi Ben,
2011/5/8 Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk:
I think it would be interesting to have one armel/armhf common config,
but I have not yet looked into that.
We do. The Kconfig files for armhf are armel/config, armhf/config.
Yes, I was thinking on something like a toplevel arm[el,hf]
Package: linux-2.6
Version: attempting to reboot on UEFI systems causes kernel hang
Severity: important
Tags: upstream
When attempting to reboot my my UEFI enabled system, the system hangs when
calling reboot requiring me to manually reset the system via the reset switch.
Screenshot:
On Sat, 2011-05-07 at 19:50 -0500, Austin English wrote:
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.38-3
Severity: normal
This is a bug in the kernel itself, there have been a few patches to
the kernel, but it seems at least one patch is not in the vanilla
kernel. Some other distributions are
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 626021 + moreinfo
Bug #626021 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.38-2-686: icebp (opcode 0xf1) no longer
causing a SIGTRAP, breaks Wine
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
626021:
On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 21:11, Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk wrote:
On Sat, 2011-05-07 at 19:50 -0500, Austin English wrote:
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.38-3
Severity: normal
This is a bug in the kernel itself, there have been a few patches to
the kernel, but it seems at least one
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 626021 - moreinfo
Bug #626021 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.38-2-686: icebp (opcode 0xf1) no longer
causing a SIGTRAP, breaks Wine
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
tags 626021 + upstream
Bug #626021 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.38-2-686: icebp (opcode
Probably you are the uploader of the following file(s) in
the Debian upload queue directory:
linux-2.6_2.6.38-5.diff.gz
linux-2.6_2.6.38-5.dsc
This looks like an upload, but a .changes file is missing, so the job
cannot be processed.
If no .changes file arrives within 23:29:35, the files will
linux-2.6_2.6.38-5_multi.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-2.6_2.6.38-5.dsc
linux-2.6_2.6.38-5.diff.gz
linux-patch-debian-2.6.38_2.6.38-5_all.deb
linux-support-2.6.38-2_2.6.38-5_all.deb
linux-source-2.6.38_2.6.38-5_all.deb
linux-latest-2.6_34_multi.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-latest-2.6_34.dsc
linux-latest-2.6_34.tar.gz
linux-doc-2.6_2.6.38+34_all.deb
linux-image-486_2.6.38+34_i386.deb
linux-image-2.6-486_2.6.38+34_i386.deb
On Saturday, 23 April 2011 19:09:30 -0300,
Daniel Bareiro wrote:
Here I found a thread [1] with a problem quite like this (although
in my case the hardware is different: A8V-MX motherboard and AMD
Athlon 64 Processor 3500+) in the xen-users mailing list. And
another thread [2] which
30 matches
Mail list logo
