Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
# The bts failed to realize this bug is archivable
# It cannot see the fixed version in etch (not sure why)
# So removing the found version, which should do the trick
notfound 468215 0.4
Bug #468215 {Done: dann frazier da...@debian.org}
Hello,
same' here - running squeeze / 2.6.32-5-vserver-amd64 #1 SMP Tue Jun 14
11:50:10 UTC 2011 x86_64 GNU/Linux
This seems to be a regression coming from one of the latest security updates.
It haven't occurred a few months before ...
[1772617.686367] [ cut here ]
linux-2.6_3.0.0-1_multi.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-2.6_3.0.0-1.dsc
linux-2.6_3.0.0.orig.tar.gz
linux-2.6_3.0.0-1.diff.gz
linux-patch-debian-3.0.0_3.0.0-1_all.deb
linux-support-3.0.0-1_3.0.0-1_all.deb
linux-source-3.0.0_3.0.0-1_all.deb
linux-2.6_3.0.0-1.diff.gz
to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_3.0.0-1.diff.gz
linux-2.6_3.0.0-1.dsc
to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_3.0.0-1.dsc
linux-2.6_3.0.0.orig.tar.gz
to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_3.0.0.orig.tar.gz
linux-doc-3.0.0_3.0.0-1_all.deb
to
Accepted:
linux-2.6_3.0.0-1.diff.gz
to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_3.0.0-1.diff.gz
linux-2.6_3.0.0-1.dsc
to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_3.0.0-1.dsc
linux-2.6_3.0.0.orig.tar.gz
to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_3.0.0.orig.tar.gz
linux-doc-3.0.0_3.0.0-1_all.deb
to
On Sat, 2011-07-23 at 19:45 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 03:05:37PM +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote:
I intend to upload linux-2.6 version 3.0.0-1 to unstable tomorrow.
* Make gcc-4.5 the default compiler (except for alpha, hppa and m68k)
This change got reverted
linux-kbuild-2.6_3.0.0-1_multi.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-kbuild-2.6_3.0.0-1.dsc
linux-kbuild-2.6_3.0.0.orig.tar.gz
linux-kbuild-2.6_3.0.0-1.diff.gz
linux-kbuild-3.0.0_3.0.0-1_amd64.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on
linux-latest-2.6_39_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-latest-2.6_39.dsc
linux-latest-2.6_39.tar.gz
linux-doc_3.0.0+39_all.deb
linux-source_3.0.0+39_all.deb
linux-tools_3.0.0+39_all.deb
linux-doc-2.6_3.0.0+39_all.deb
Signed-off-by: Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com
---
debian/config/i386/defines |3 +--
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/debian/config/i386/defines b/debian/config/i386/defines
index 466949b..a2da916 100644
--- a/debian/config/i386/defines
+++
firmware-nonfree_0.33_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
firmware-nonfree_0.33.dsc
firmware-nonfree_0.33.tar.gz
firmware-linux_0.33_all.deb
firmware-atheros_0.33_all.deb
firmware-bnx2_0.33_all.deb
firmware-bnx2x_0.33_all.deb
As an addendum:
ARCH=i386
FEATURESET=rt
# Generate missing linux-headers-*-common package
fakeroot make -f debian/rules.gen binary-arch_${ARCH}_${FEATURESET}_real
- Sedat -
2011/7/24 Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@googlemail.com:
Hi,
I played a bit with the new Real-Time (RT) featureset on i386.
Accepted:
firmware-atheros_0.33_all.deb
to non-free/f/firmware-nonfree/firmware-atheros_0.33_all.deb
firmware-bnx2_0.33_all.deb
to non-free/f/firmware-nonfree/firmware-bnx2_0.33_all.deb
firmware-bnx2x_0.33_all.deb
to non-free/f/firmware-nonfree/firmware-bnx2x_0.33_all.deb
Accepted:
linux-kbuild-2.6_3.0.0-1.diff.gz
to main/l/linux-kbuild-2.6/linux-kbuild-2.6_3.0.0-1.diff.gz
linux-kbuild-2.6_3.0.0-1.dsc
to main/l/linux-kbuild-2.6/linux-kbuild-2.6_3.0.0-1.dsc
linux-kbuild-2.6_3.0.0.orig.tar.gz
to main/l/linux-kbuild-2.6/linux-kbuild-2.6_3.0.0.orig.tar.gz
Accepted:
linux-doc-2.6_3.0.0+39_all.deb
to main/l/linux-latest-2.6/linux-doc-2.6_3.0.0+39_all.deb
linux-doc_3.0.0+39_all.deb
to main/l/linux-latest-2.6/linux-doc_3.0.0+39_all.deb
linux-headers-2.6-486_3.0.0+39_i386.deb
to main/l/linux-latest-2.6/linux-headers-2.6-486_3.0.0+39_i386.deb
Hi,
As already send to debian-backports list, there is an issue with
current 2.6.38 backport kernel and bnx2 firmware.
During install, I get the following message :
update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-2.6.38-bpo.2-amd64
W: Possible missing firmware
On sam., 2011-07-23 at 15:05 +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote:
If it's ready in time, we may also be able to add an 'rt' (real-time)
featureset, initially for amd64 only.
So featuresets are still somewhat supported / acceptable?
Regards,
--
Yves-Alexis
signature.asc
Description: This is a
Hello,
Recently I installed Debian Linux 6 (Squeeze, kernel 2.6.32-5-amd64 #1
SMP) via netinst on an IBM eServer platform. The system has dual AMD
Opteron processors.
While transferring lots of data from the original server this server was
expected to replace, I noticed errors appearing
On Sun, 2011-07-24 at 16:35 +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
Signed-off-by: Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com
---
debian/config/i386/defines |3 +--
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/debian/config/i386/defines b/debian/config/i386/defines
index 466949b..a2da916
On Sun, 2011-07-24 at 16:58 +0200, Vincent Maugé wrote:
Hi,
As already send to debian-backports list, there is an issue with
current 2.6.38 backport kernel and bnx2 firmware.
[...]
Please consider backporting firmware-bnx2 from wheezy to enable
Broadcom under 2.6.38 Kernel.
The kernel team
On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 6:41 PM, Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk wrote:
On Sun, 2011-07-24 at 16:35 +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
Signed-off-by: Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com
---
debian/config/i386/defines | 3 +--
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git
Well, the old slip-open behavior was not correspond to the TTY logic.
So, is it possible to fix VPND instead of reverting the patch? Greg,
what do you think about it?
2011/7/22 Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk:
On Fri, 2011-07-22 at 08:30 -0300, SUPORTE - Kernel Informática wrote:
I had a
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.32-35
Severity: minor
--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
UFS is now supported in Debian GNU/Linux only in read only mode. I'm
aware of http://wiki.debian.org/Debian_GNU/kFreeBSD_FAQ and note, that
it's likely to cause panics (how old is this
On Sun, 2011-07-24 at 17:19 +0200, Jaap Hoetmer wrote:
Hello,
Recently I installed Debian Linux 6 (Squeeze, kernel 2.6.32-5-amd64 #1
SMP) via netinst on an IBM eServer platform. The system has dual AMD
Opteron processors.
While transferring lots of data from the original server this
On Sun, 2011-07-24 at 17:24 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
On sam., 2011-07-23 at 15:05 +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote:
If it's ready in time, we may also be able to add an 'rt' (real-time)
featureset, initially for amd64 only.
So featuresets are still somewhat supported / acceptable?
On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 04:35:16PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
[nothing]
Why do you thing the current is incorrect and what bug does it fix for
you?
Bastian
--
Violence in reality is quite different from theory.
-- Spock, The Cloud Minders, stardate 5818.4
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
# Sun Jul 24 20:07:44 UTC 2011
# Tagging as pending bugs that are closed by packages in NEW
# http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html
#
# Source package in NEW: summain
tags 631861 + pending
Bug #631861 [wnpp] ITP: summain -- create file
Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk schrieb:
--=-oAGGyietHuyp77ujkKt4
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Sun, 2011-07-24 at 17:24 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
On sam., 2011-07-23 at 15:05 +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote:
If it's ready in
Thanks, Ben.
I am not too familiar with non-stock kernels. I did have a look at all
the kernel.org release notes, but could not find the specific error in
any of them. Anyway, as my note mentioned, I suspected it to be needing
a later kernel and it didn't seem to have any negative impact on
On July 23, 2011 06:56:44 AM Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
On Thu, 21 Jul 2011, Bruce Sass wrote:
This is not a bug. NFS clients are supposed to keep on trying to reach
the server, by default. You should have unmounted the directory from
the NFS client(s) before shutting down the
Package: linux-doc-2.6.39
Severity: normal
For a while now, I've had the kernel crash. Way back when, I used to run
crashme (1.2.13) and
I am seeing more crashes now, on hardware that is not new. It's baffling.
Memtest doesn't see
a problem with RAM (booting from ubuntu CD, booting off the
30 matches
Mail list logo
