Source: linux
Version: 4.14.13-1
Severity: minor
User: debian-powe...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: powerpc
At least on my G4 Mac Mini, I can see:
$ cp /boot/config-4.14.0-3-powerpc .config
$ make savedefconfig
scripts/kconfig/conf --savedefconfig=defconfig Kconfig
.config:3186:warning: symbol valu
Am 29.01.2018 um 17:44 schrieb Yves-Alexis Perez:
> On Wed, 2017-10-11 at 11:05 +0200, Benjamin Sygnat wrote:
>> - The screen (Dell U2415, resolution 1920x1200) which is connected to my AMD
>> Radeon R9 270X (on DisplayPort-0) occasionally flickers every few seconds.
>> The
>> flickering appears t
As a side note: I still have some older kernel version from
stretch-backports on my PC. I tried it with the oldest one of these
kernels. The problem doesn't occur with the kernel "4.12.0-0.bpo.2-amd64
#1 SMP Debian 4.12.13-1~bpo9+1 (2017-09-28) x86_64 GNU/Linux".
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 889146 src:linux 3.2.96-3
Bug #889146 [linux-image-3.2.0-5-amd64] smartctl - Read Device Identity failed
Warning: Unknown package 'linux-image-3.2.0-5-amd64'
Bug reassigned from package 'linux-image-3.2.0-5-amd64' to 'src:linux'.
No longe
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed pending fixed-upstream
Bug #886556 [src:linux] linux-image-4.15.0-rc5-amd64: NULL pointer dereference
in ecc_gen_privkey [ecdh_generic] at boot
Added tag(s) confirmed, pending, and fixed-upstream.
--
886556: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugr
Control: tags -1 + confirmed pending fixed-upstream
Hi
On Sun, Jan 07, 2018 at 06:23:40PM +0200, Mihai Basa wrote:
> Package: src:linux
> Version: 4.15~rc5-1~exp1
> Severity: important
> Tags: patch
>
> On boot, a NULL pointer dereference is encountered in ecc_gen_privkey in
> the ecdh_generic m
Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> There are, however, people *not* running Debian-built kernels, and
> sometimes for good reasons. This is a configuration that we should
> still support.
Is it supported, but it's also clearly documented that people need to
enable this sysctl for custom kernels:
https://www
On 2018-02-02 21:25:31, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> Antoine Beaupré wrote:
>> There are, however, people *not* running Debian-built kernels, and
>> sometimes for good reasons. This is a configuration that we should
>> still support.
>
> Is it supported, but it's also clearly documented that people n
Hi Antoine (and kernel and security teams),
Thanks for giving me the background as it's a kernel vulnerability not a
Procps one I wasn't aware of it.
The change to Procps is pretty simple but given that you need to be running
a non Debian kernel without this parameter what's groups' opinion of t
9 matches
Mail list logo