Bug#998627: sid enable

2022-06-18 Thread Mina Morcose Farage
hello sid and teasting made for this purpose i  suggest to enable it in sid at least and see where it goes Thanks Mina

Bug#1013192: linux-image-5.10.0-15-amd64: ridiculously small entropy pool

2022-06-18 Thread Bastian Blank
Control: severity -1 normal Control: tags -1 wontfix On Sat, Jun 18, 2022 at 09:52:41PM +0200, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > /proc/sys/kernel/random/poolsize is now 256 instead of 4096 bits, > which was already small before. The pool size for an RPNG is only the size of the state, nothing else. It

Processed: Re: Bug#1013192: linux-image-5.10.0-15-amd64: ridiculously small entropy pool

2022-06-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > severity -1 normal Bug #1013192 [src:linux] linux-image-5.10.0-15-amd64: ridiculously small entropy pool Severity set to 'normal' from 'serious' > tags -1 wontfix Bug #1013192 [src:linux] linux-image-5.10.0-15-amd64: ridiculously small entropy pool Added tag(s)

Bug#1013192: linux-image-5.10.0-15-amd64: ridiculously small entropy pool

2022-06-18 Thread Diederik de Haas
On Saturday, 18 June 2022 22:47:01 CEST Diederik de Haas wrote: > Here are some more 'random' threads I have found: And this seems like an entire document explaining it: https://www.zx2c4.com/projects/linux-rng-5.17-5.18/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Bug#1013192: linux-image-5.10.0-15-amd64: ridiculously small entropy pool

2022-06-18 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Package: src:linux Version: 5.10.120-1 Severity: serious Tags: security X-Debbugs-Cc: Debian Security Team /proc/sys/kernel/random/poolsize is now 256 instead of 4096 bits, which was already small before. Why was such a change allowed into stable? This also breaks rngd’s --fill-watermark

Processed: Re: Bug#1013192: linux-image-5.10.0-15-amd64: ridiculously small entropy pool

2022-06-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > severity -1 normal Bug #1013192 [src:linux] linux-image-5.10.0-15-amd64: ridiculously small entropy pool Ignoring request to change severity of Bug 1013192 to the same value. > merge -1 1012835 Bug #1013192 [src:linux] linux-image-5.10.0-15-amd64: ridiculously

Bug#1013192: linux-image-5.10.0-15-amd64: ridiculously small entropy pool

2022-06-18 Thread Diederik de Haas
Control: severity -1 normal Control: merge -1 1012835 On Saturday, 18 June 2022 21:52:41 CEST Thorsten Glaser wrote: > Version: 5.10.120-1 > Severity: serious > Tags: security There has been a HUGE changeset applied between 5.10.118 and 5.10.119 and while not entirely certain, I'm quite

Bug#1013192: linux-image-5.10.0-15-amd64: ridiculously small entropy pool

2022-06-18 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Bastian Blank dixit: >The pool size for an RPNG is only the size of the state, nothing else. Yes, and that is the problem. It was small before, it’s ridiculous now. >might not have had any value before anyway. You just need to reseed on >a regular interval. Ugh. I recall reading something

linux-signed-amd64_5.18.5+1_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable, unstable

2022-06-18 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2022 23:40:32 +0200 Source: linux-signed-amd64 Architecture: source Version: 5.18.5+1 Distribution: sid Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Kernel Team Changed-By: Salvatore Bonaccorso Changes:

Bug#1012741: modprobe: ERROR: could not insert 'crc_itu_t': Key was rejected by service

2022-06-18 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Thu, 2022-06-16 at 01:28 +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote: [...] > linux-image-4.19.0-17-amd64 4.19.194-1 > lib/modules/4.19.0-17-amd64/kernel/drivers/dma/dw/dw_dmac_core.ko > linux-image-4.19.0-17-amd64 4.19.194-2 > lib/modules/4.19.0-17-amd64/kernel/drivers/dma/dw/dw_dmac_core.ko >

Bug#1013180: linux-image-5.18.0-1-amd64: System doesn't go to sleep in 5.18.0-1 kernel

2022-06-18 Thread Alexandr Podgorniy
Package: linux-image-5.18.0-1-amd64 Version: 5.18.0-1 Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: sac...@scaledteam.ru Dear Maintainer, System doesn't go to sleep in 5.18.0-1 kernel, but it's fine in 5.16 and 5.15. System tries to go to sleep, but then it wakes up immidiately. Dmesg shows some

Bug#1013180: linux-image-5.18.0-1-amd64: System doesn't go to sleep in 5.18.0-1 kernel

2022-06-18 Thread Diederik de Haas
On Saturday, 18 June 2022 16:28:57 CEST Alexandr Podgorniy wrote: > Dear Maintainer, System doesn't go to sleep in 5.18.0-1 kernel, but it's > fine in 5.16 and 5.15. System tries to go to sleep, but then it wakes up > immidiately. This may be the same as #1012054 so please try if the problem is

Bug#1013180: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender

2022-06-18 Thread Diederik de Haas
On zaterdag 18 juni 2022 17:13:33 CEST you wrote: > I'm sorry to have to inform you that your message could not > be delivered to one or more recipients. It's attached below. > > : host scaledteam.ru[81.30.221.145] said: 550 5.1.1 > : Recipient address rejected: User unknown in > local

Bug#992131: R8169 CRASH! (rtl_rxtx_empty_cond == 0 (loop: 42, delay: 100))

2022-06-18 Thread a...@prnet.info
I have seen these lines too yesterday on Debian 11, but on Linux 5.15.0-0.bpo.3-amd64. kernel: r8169 :03:00.1 eno1: rtl_txcfg_empty_cond == 0 (loop: 42, delay: 100). kernel: r8169 :03:00.1 eno1: rtl_rxtx_empty_cond == 0 (loop: 42, delay: 100). Out of sudden like 2 times, "nmcli network

Bug#1012741: modprobe: ERROR: could not insert 'crc_itu_t': Key was rejected by service

2022-06-18 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Sat, 2022-06-18 at 16:21 +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote: [...] > Incidentally, this is a failure rate of 75 out of 4,967,591 signatures, > or 0.0015% [...] Or maybe not so incidentally: 4,967,591 / 2^16 ~= 75 Ben. -- Ben Hutchings The Peter principle: In a hierarchy, every employee tends to