Hi,
On Fri, Oct 21, 2022 at 12:55:09PM +, Dan Coleman wrote:
> Hey,
>
> > On Thursday, 20 October 2022 22:10:27 CEST Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
>
> > > So there are two patches who need to be reverted:
> > >
> > >
> https://lore.kernel.org/stable/20221020153857.565160-1-alexander.deuc...@amd.com/
> > >
> https://lore.kernel.org/stable/20221020153857.565160-2-alexander.deuc...@amd.com/
>
>
> How do I apply these patches to see if they work for me? Thus far in
> this bug, I've just seen .patch files.
Here are those as patches.
If you trust unsigned binary packages build I would put somehwere I
can provide you those with those two applied. But again, after testing
make sure you reinstall the meta package and go back to the -18
version.
Regards,
Salvatore
From: Alex Deucher
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2022 11:38:56 -0400
Subject: Revert "drm/amdgpu: move nbio sdma_doorbell_range() into sdma code
for vega"
Origin: https://lore.kernel.org/stable/20221020153857.565160-1-alexander.deuc...@amd.com/
Bug-Debian: https://bugs.debian.org/1022025
This reverts commit 9f55f36f749a7608eeef57d7d72991a9bd557341.
This patch was backported incorrectly when Sasha backported it and
the patch that caused the regression that this patch set fixed
was reverted in commit 412b844143e3 ("Revert "PCI/portdrv: Don't disable AER reporting in get_port_device_capability()"").
This isn't necessary and causes a regression so drop it.
Bug: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/-/issues/2216
Cc: Shuah Khan
Cc: Sasha Levin
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher
Cc: # 5.10
Tested-By: Diederik de Haas
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/sdma_v4_0.c | 5 -
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/soc15.c | 25 +
2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/sdma_v4_0.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/sdma_v4_0.c
index a1a8e026b9fa..1f2e2460e121 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/sdma_v4_0.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/sdma_v4_0.c
@@ -1475,11 +1475,6 @@ static int sdma_v4_0_start(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
WREG32_SDMA(i, mmSDMA0_CNTL, temp);
if (!amdgpu_sriov_vf(adev)) {
- ring = >sdma.instance[i].ring;
- adev->nbio.funcs->sdma_doorbell_range(adev, i,
-ring->use_doorbell, ring->doorbell_index,
-adev->doorbell_index.sdma_doorbell_range);
-
/* unhalt engine */
temp = RREG32_SDMA(i, mmSDMA0_F32_CNTL);
temp = REG_SET_FIELD(temp, SDMA0_F32_CNTL, HALT, 0);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/soc15.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/soc15.c
index abd649285a22..7212b9900e0a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/soc15.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/soc15.c
@@ -1332,6 +1332,25 @@ static int soc15_common_sw_fini(void *handle)
return 0;
}
+static void soc15_doorbell_range_init(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
+{
+ int i;
+ struct amdgpu_ring *ring;
+
+ /* sdma/ih doorbell range are programed by hypervisor */
+ if (!amdgpu_sriov_vf(adev)) {
+ for (i = 0; i < adev->sdma.num_instances; i++) {
+ ring = >sdma.instance[i].ring;
+ adev->nbio.funcs->sdma_doorbell_range(adev, i,
+ring->use_doorbell, ring->doorbell_index,
+adev->doorbell_index.sdma_doorbell_range);
+ }
+
+ adev->nbio.funcs->ih_doorbell_range(adev, adev->irq.ih.use_doorbell,
+ adev->irq.ih.doorbell_index);
+ }
+}
+
static int soc15_common_hw_init(void *handle)
{
struct amdgpu_device *adev = (struct amdgpu_device *)handle;
@@ -1351,6 +1370,12 @@ static int soc15_common_hw_init(void *handle)
/* enable the doorbell aperture */
soc15_enable_doorbell_aperture(adev, true);
+ /* HW doorbell routing policy: doorbell writing not
+ * in SDMA/IH/MM/ACV range will be routed to CP. So
+ * we need to init SDMA/IH/MM/ACV doorbell range prior
+ * to CP ip block init and ring test.
+ */
+ soc15_doorbell_range_init(adev);
return 0;
}
--
2.37.2
From: Alex Deucher
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2022 11:38:57 -0400
Subject: Revert "drm/amdgpu: make sure to init common IP before gmc"
Origin: https://lore.kernel.org/stable/20221020153857.565160-2-alexander.deuc...@amd.com/
Bug-Debian: https://bugs.debian.org/1022025
This reverts commit 7b0db849ea030a70b8fb9c9afec67c81f955482e.
The patches that this patch depends on were not backported properly
and the patch that caused the regression that this patch set fixed
was reverted in commit 412b844143e3 ("Revert "PCI/portdrv: Don't disable AER reporting in get_port_device_capability()"").
This isn't necessary and causes a regression so drop it.
Bug: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/-/issues/2216
Cc: Shuah Khan
Cc: Sasha Levin
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher
Cc: # 5.10
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c | 14 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
index 881045e600af..bde0496d2f15 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
@@
