On Sun, 2009-08-09 at 10:39 +0200, Piotr Engelking wrote:
reopen 278729
thanks
The bug was fixed in *-686 kernels, but not in *-amd64 ones:
$ apt-cache show linux-image-2.6.30-1-686 | grep ^Recommends:
Recommends: libc6-i686
$ apt-cache show linux-image-2.6.30-1-amd64 | grep ^Recommends:
reopen 278729
thanks
The bug was fixed in *-686 kernels, but not in *-amd64 ones:
$ apt-cache show linux-image-2.6.30-1-686 | grep ^Recommends:
Recommends: libc6-i686
$ apt-cache show linux-image-2.6.30-1-amd64 | grep ^Recommends:
$
Please add the above dependency to the *-amd64 kernels, as
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
reopen 278729
Bug #278729 {Done: Sven Luther lut...@debian.org} [linux-2.6] some i386
images should recommend libc6-i686
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
you may need to use 'found' to remove fixed
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
On Tue, 8 Nov 2005 15:34:48 +0100, Sven Luther wrote [typo corrected]:
You can now, just need to add
Recommends: blah to the arch/arch/defines entry.
Now the capability has been added, any chance you could pop this extra line
in? I'd be happy to do it
On Tue, 8 Nov 2005 15:34:48 +0100, Sven Luther wrote [typo corrected]:
You can now, just need to add
Recommends: blah to the arch/arch/defines entry.
Now the capability has been added, any chance you could pop this extra line
in? I'd be happy to do it myself, but of course I can't.
Richard.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 8 Nov 2005 11:31:10 +0900
Horms [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Waldi, can you coment on how to add a recommends to
images on a per-flavour basis?
Isn't per-flavour control hints one of the new features of the
soon-to-be-in-sid kernel-package?
On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 11:19:36AM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 8 Nov 2005 11:31:10 +0900
Horms [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Waldi, can you coment on how to add a recommends to
images on a per-flavour basis?
Isn't per-flavour
On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 11:36:13AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 11:19:36AM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 8 Nov 2005 11:31:10 +0900
Horms [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Waldi, can you coment on how to add a
On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 03:14:47PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 08:30:53PM +0900, Horms wrote:
On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 11:36:13AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 11:19:36AM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash:
On Tue, 8 Nov 2005 14:26:17 +0100, Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 08:30:53PM +0900, Horms wrote:
On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 11:36:13AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 11:19:36AM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 09:01:24AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On Tue, 8 Nov 2005 14:26:17 +0100, Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 08:30:53PM +0900, Horms wrote:
On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 11:36:13AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 11:19:36AM
On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 09:01:24AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On Tue, 8 Nov 2005 14:26:17 +0100, Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 08:30:53PM +0900, Horms wrote:
On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 11:36:13AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 11:19:36AM
On Wed, 9 Nov 2005 00:22:23 +0900, Horms [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 09:01:24AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On Tue, 8 Nov 2005 14:26:17 +0100, Sven Luther
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 08:30:53PM +0900, Horms wrote:
On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at
Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 12:53:47PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On Wed, 9 Nov 2005 00:22:23 +0900, Horms [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Don't we need to handle the control file ourselves because we make
multiple make-kpkg invocations which all come
On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 12:44:53AM +, Horms wrote:
Manoj, we already do this, see the templates dir and bin/gencontrol.py. I
told
you that earlier already.
Is there really any need to be so aggressive?
Well, notice this is the second time i asked him to look at how we do, and it
was
2.6.8 is frozen solid for sarge. IF there is interest in having this
added for the etch kernels, can you please reasign it to linux-2.6
I think it should become a permanent addition to all 686 class kernels going
forward, but I don't mind what point that starts at - unstable would be fine
for
reassign 278729 linux-2.6
retitle 278729 some i386 images should recommend libc6-i686
thanks
On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 04:58:36PM +, Richard Burton wrote:
2.6.8 is frozen solid for sarge. IF there is interest in having this
added for the etch kernels, can you please reasign it to linux-2.6
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 278729 linux-2.6
Bug#278729: kernel-image-2.6-k7: kernel-image-2.6*-k7* and 2.6*-686* should
recommend libc6-i686
Bug reassigned from package `kernel-image-2.6-k7' to `linux-2.6'.
retitle 278729 some i386 images should recommend libc6-i686
Kernel-images 2.6.x-686 and 2.6.x-k7 shoud recommend libc6-i686,
because libc6-686 improves system performance when running with
2.6.x-686 and 2.6.x-k7 kernel-images.
Thanks for the clarification.
I now agree with your suggestion.
I will get it into the tree, but
my TODO list is rather long
On Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 12:45:17PM +0200, AKL. Mantas Kriauciunas wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 01, 2004 at 11:30:09AM +0900, Horms wrote:
On Fri, Oct 29, 2004 at 02:37:36AM +0300, Mantas Kriauinas wrote:
In package libc6-i686 description I see this info:
This set of libraries is
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 01, 2004 at 11:30:09AM +0900, Horms wrote:
On Fri, Oct 29, 2004 at 02:37:36AM +0300, Mantas Kriauinas wrote:
In package libc6-i686 description I see this info:
This set of libraries is optimized for i686 machines, and will only be used
if you are running a 2.6 kernel
21 matches
Mail list logo
