Package: firmware-linux-nonfree
Version: 20160824-1
Followup-For: Bug #522415
Dear Maintainer,
FWIW I also think that having the meta packages bring in as many
firmware packages as possible can be useful.
I would put the dependency in the firmware-linux-nonfree package rather
than in the top-lev
On Sat, 04 Apr 2009, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> All firmware that comes from the upstream firmware/ directory will be
> included in the firmware-linux package, not a driver/vendor-specific
> package. This accounts for an increasing majority of the firmware.
This prediction doesn't seem to have come t
Hi Ben,
On Sonntag, 5. April 2009, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> All firmware that comes from the upstream firmware/ directory will be
> included in the firmware-linux package, not a driver/vendor-specific
> package. This accounts for an increasing majority of the firmware.
Thanks for the explaination.
On Sat, 2009-04-04 at 08:43 +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Samstag, 4. April 2009, maximilian attems wrote:
> > and here comes a fsf purist :P wanting better usability.
> > as i told you this will be anyway the tendancy
> > as all newer firmware will land in f-linux.
>
> eparse.
>
> hint: te bt
On Samstag, 4. April 2009, maximilian attems wrote:
> and here comes a fsf purist :P wanting better usability.
> as i told you this will be anyway the tendancy
> as all newer firmware will land in f-linux.
eparse.
hint: te bts aint sms, ya ca use pr0per inglish.
signature.asc
Description: This
On Sat, Apr 04, 2009 at 01:00:27AM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
> installed but not the firmware), so a depends would work.
>
> I'd prefer a all-firmwarez meta-package though, which _recommends_ all binary
> packages build from the firmware-nonfree source package :-)
>
> (recommends are installed
Hi,
On Samstag, 4. April 2009, maximilian attems wrote:
> no this is not possible due to license differences.
> ipwX needs a click through, but there will be soon unification
> as bnx2 will land in firmware-linux and so on..
huh? you need to accept the ipwX licence anyway (else the package will b
On Fri, Apr 03, 2009 at 04:49:49PM +0200, Xavier Bestel wrote:
> Package: firmware-nonfree
> Severity: wishlist
>
>
> Hi,
>
> would it be possible to create an umbrella package which would depend on all
> firmware-* packages, so every new firmware package would be installed
> automatically ?
Package: firmware-nonfree
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
would it be possible to create an umbrella package which would depend on all
firmware-* packages, so every new firmware package would be installed
automatically ?
Thanks,
Xav
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT pre
9 matches
Mail list logo
